Garrett Turbo Information
Not sure if you guys have seen this before...it's a great source of info. on Garrett's turbo lineup, including compressor maps too!!
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...ers.html#medium
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarre...ers.html#medium
The Dots are at 9000, when plotting it's basicly a straight line across. The dots may not be "perfect" but They are close enough to aid in a turbo selection. I use a niftly little program that calculates this all. VE being that X factor that I have to guess at. I have heard everything from 100%-140%. I use 112% for all my calculations.
Originally Posted by Scorpion,Jan 3 2006, 07:56 PM
The Dots are at 9000, when plotting it's basicly a straight line across. The dots may not be "perfect" but They are close enough to aid in a turbo selection. I use a niftly little program that calculates this all. VE being that X factor that I have to guess at. I have heard everything from 100%-140%. I use 112% for all my calculations.
I still feel that the lb/min is a bit low, you need roughly 1 lb/min per 10 HP
Originally Posted by PSC,Jan 3 2006, 01:50 AM
Are you sure those dots are in the correct place ? A NA F20C uses about 24 lb/min of air at 8300 RPM.
EDIT : I am assuming that you plotted the dots @ max power

Originally Posted by PSC,Jan 3 2006, 10:21 AM
Your Ve of 112% is about spot on (in fact the Ve is > 100 % from ~ 6250rpm onwards { SAE Technical paper 2000-01-0670 Yutaka Otobe, Hiroshi Kawaguchi and Hideo Ueshima Honda R&D Co., Ltd. Page 8 })
I still feel that the lb/min is a bit low, you need roughly 1 lb/min per 10 HP
I still feel that the lb/min is a bit low, you need roughly 1 lb/min per 10 HP
I was using 100% VE in my calculations and the result didn't look right. I think that's where I screwed up. It's incredible the F20C can have a >100% VE. That's awesome for a normally aspirated engine. I guess Formula 1 does have it's pay backs!
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by LUVNMBRS,Jan 3 2006, 11:42 PM
I could be wrong about this. I'd be lying if I said I fully understood it. But aren't we supposed to plot the injector flow rate corresponding to our horsepower goal. I believe it is 44 lb/min for 400 crank hp and 55lb/min for 500 crank hp. If that's the case, then 500 hp would not be attainable with the 3071R since it lies completely off the map.
Edit: I just noticed you said injector flow rate. Taht really has nothing to do with what we are taking about. Of course it's important to have proper fueling, but that has nothing to do with finding the proper turbo for your power goals.
Originally Posted by LUVNMBRS,Jan 4 2006, 06:46 AM
Where can I get a copy of this SAE paper? Could you email me a softcopy? It looks like an interesting read.
here is the link Document Number: 2000-01-0670
It's US$ 12 for non members to download a DRM protected copy.
Originally Posted by Scorpion,Jan 3 2006, 09:05 PM
There are a lot of factors that determine the amount of air flow needed to hit a certain HP mark. If your turbo puts out 10hp per psi, then you will nedd less air than a setup that only puts out 8hp per psi. Look around the forums and you'll see that kits very on hp per psi greatly. It's not just how efficiant the turbo is, but also the maifold, intercooler and piping. Garrett recommends using a 10hp per psi for calculating lb/min on there turbos. Which means if I wanted 400hp (crank) then I'd need 40 lb/min. The problem with this is that because the lovefab I have is so efficant, I make over 310whp (370bhp) at around 30 lb/min.
Edit: I just noticed you said injector flow rate. Taht really has nothing to do with what we are taking about. Of course it's important to have proper fueling, but that has nothing to do with finding the proper turbo for your power goals.
Edit: I just noticed you said injector flow rate. Taht really has nothing to do with what we are taking about. Of course it's important to have proper fueling, but that has nothing to do with finding the proper turbo for your power goals.


