S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

InlinePRO 2.5L Stroker Kit

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 25, 2008 | 07:51 PM
  #1  
PancakeFace124's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default InlinePRO 2.5L Stroker Kit

I've been looking on threads about this kit but cant find any threads. (well I found one) Anyway does anyone have some dynos comparing the before and after performance. Is there substantial performance gains, is it worth the money. Anyone have this AND a turbo setup?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 01:27 AM
  #2  
d-j's Avatar
d-j
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
From: STL -> Tampa
Default

Vortech, not turbo.

Is there substantial performance gains? Yes
Is it worth the money? IMO
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 03:17 AM
  #3  
busterpit23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Beach, SC
Default

IP currently has my motor being built as a 2.5L and it will be turbo charged. Look at my sig thats what I will be working with.

Here's one of there dynos of there first turbo setup with a non ball bearing GT35.
You might compare it to a 2.0 with a GT35R and see the difference. The one thing you'll notice is the drastic increase in torque.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 04:03 AM
  #4  
PancakeFace124's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Default

wow d-j, that really sick. nice build
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #5  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by busterpit23,Mar 26 2008, 06:17 AM
IP currently has my motor being built as a 2.5L and it will be turbo charged. Look at my sig thats what I will be working with.

Here's one of there dynos of there first turbo setup with a non ball bearing GT35.
You might compare it to a 2.0 with a GT35R and see the difference. The one thing you'll notice is the drastic increase in torque.
That torque number is ridiculous!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #6  
busterpit23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Beach, SC
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Mar 26 2008, 03:14 PM
That torque number is ridiculous!
It is pretty sick. I don't know how am going to keep my car going straight. I am looking to hit 500 ft tq with my setup. That kinda of torque is one thing for a V8 car, but in a light weight car like the S it is just plain nutts.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #7  
TJTURBO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Default

is the tranny gonna hold that kind of torque? what's the price diff between the 2.0L and the 2.5L from inlinepro?
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #8  
CU Nick's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Default

500 ftlbs would be so nasty! That S would deffinately scoot!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 04:38 PM
  #9  
busterpit23's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Myrtle Beach, SC
Default

Originally Posted by TJTURBO,Mar 26 2008, 04:12 PM
is the tranny gonna hold that kind of torque? what's the price diff between the 2.0L and the 2.5L from inlinepro?
I doubt it will hold up.

Your looking at about $1500 more.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
w00tw00t111's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Default

Busterpit have you driven the s yet?

A concern of mine was what you pointed out, 500 ft/lbs in our short wheel base car/light car seems as though it would be extremely difficult to gain and hold traction.

Although, stroking and boosting seems like an awesomely lethal combo.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:09 AM.