opinions about new garrett g25-660 vs gen2 gtx3071r
#21
Thread Starter
#24
i was told 425 was the pump tune but looking at the graph I’d say it’s actually the 421.
458 and presumably 425 is a Borg s256 w/open dump. Difference between those is one is 93 and the other 100 octane
477 and presumably 421 is the g25-600 w/recirculated dump. One is 93 and the other e85 (tested at e70).
One thing that doesn’t show on the graph is how much better transient response is. It also seems to want to rev faster now. Feels much better suited for the rev-happy nature of the engine
#25
Nice... same power on pump and about 400rpm better spool. You're probably giving up about 15whp with the recirculated WG instead of dump too. I'm going with the 0.72 A/R on my setup on my AP2 targeting max spool. Your powerband looks pretty awesome though, pretty much 5k rpm width. The transient response of the G25-660 is a good selling point. It should be about the same as the EFR7163.
#26
recirculated dump doesnt make a difference. Max that thing out so we have some numbers! lol. 450 is fun, but you'll get used to it real quick. 5-550 is when it starts to get fun/sketchy. Im guessing your tuner went soft on the ignition timing. my torque was equal/higher than the horsepower up til 400tq. I'd love to see this turbo maxed out vs the s257 below
Last edited by Charper732; 04-24-2019 at 02:06 PM.
#28
Eh, to each their own but I disagree. I used the matchbot and it came out to a .88 housing which proved to be way too small.
At 600hp or less, backpressure is not a problem unless youve got a crazy restrictive exhaust. Ive personally tested this on my car with a pte 6062 and my current bw257. Ive ran open dump and ive ran full exhaust back to a q300. The only difference was a slightly quicker spool on the pte6062 with open dump my current recirc bw setup is making more power than the turbo is even rates for.
At 600hp or less, backpressure is not a problem unless youve got a crazy restrictive exhaust. Ive personally tested this on my car with a pte 6062 and my current bw257. Ive ran open dump and ive ran full exhaust back to a q300. The only difference was a slightly quicker spool on the pte6062 with open dump my current recirc bw setup is making more power than the turbo is even rates for.
Last edited by Charper732; 04-24-2019 at 07:37 PM.
#29
Eh, to each their own but I disagree. I used the matchbot and it came out to a .88 housing which proved to be way too small.
At 600hp or less, backpressure is not a problem unless youve got a crazy restrictive exhaust. Ive personally tested this on my car with a pte 6062 and my current bw257. Ive ran open dump and ive ran full exhaust back to a q300. The only difference was a slightly quicker spool on the pte6062 with open dump my current recirc bw setup is making more power than the turbo is even rates for.
At 600hp or less, backpressure is not a problem unless youve got a crazy restrictive exhaust. Ive personally tested this on my car with a pte 6062 and my current bw257. Ive ran open dump and ive ran full exhaust back to a q300. The only difference was a slightly quicker spool on the pte6062 with open dump my current recirc bw setup is making more power than the turbo is even rates for.
And MatchBot is missing most of their newer turbos. It does report air mass flow and pressure ratio, so the position on the compressor map can be manually determined and the compressor efficiency manually added. The exhaust flow is generic based on turbine OD and A/R. However, what is their calculation for the exhaust mass flow?
That said, it seems to be the only tool with similar capability available. It can be cross-checked with Garrett's Boost Advisor for reasonableness. Garrett publishes the equations used in Boost Advisor, so those calcs can be done in Excel, Python, Matlab, MathCAD, Maple, etc. But the Garrett Boost Advisor ignores all turbine side calculations.
Note that Precision provides no numbers at all other than the compressor and turbine OD/ID and max power.
In their power estimates, none accounts for the wide range of ethanol percentages or provides any indication of susceptibility to knock.
P.S. The last picture doesn't appear to be showing.