S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Test pipe or High Flow Cat for my turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-23-2008, 09:30 PM
  #21  
Former Moderator

 
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 18,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The turbo is inefficient above 9psi. If you tune for 10-12, and you creep 2, you are still getting inefficiency up top, which begs the question, why do it in the first place? Not to mention, the potential damage to the motor boosting over 10 psi on a stock headgasket.

I am getting tuned for 9psi, and with my HKS/testpipe, I get absolutely no creep, as from downpipe to exhaust tip is 60mm straight.

I said it before, and I'll say it again, if you want big power, and high boost, you bought the wrong kit.
Old 04-23-2008, 10:56 PM
  #22  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TRBOKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phillips Ranch 909!
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Apr 23 2008, 09:30 PM
The turbo is inefficient above 9psi. If you tune for 10-12, and you creep 2, you are still getting inefficiency up top, which begs the question, why do it in the first place? Not to mention, the potential damage to the motor boosting over 10 psi on a stock headgasket.

I am getting tuned for 9psi, and with my HKS/testpipe, I get absolutely no creep, as from downpipe to exhaust tip is 60mm straight.

I said it before, and I'll say it again, if you want big power, and high boost, you bought the wrong kit.
Do you have any data from Greddy to back up these claims of the turbo being inefficient past 9K? Flow charts etc?

I don't understand how this could be true when stock cars from the factory are running sometimes double that boost level stock with smaller turbos than the T518Z with 2.0 liter motors... (WRX, Pontiac Solstice etc)

Old 04-23-2008, 11:17 PM
  #23  
Former Moderator

 
NFRs2000NYC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 18,853
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TRBOKEV,Apr 24 2008, 01:56 AM
Do you have any data from Greddy to back up these claims of the turbo being inefficient past 9K? Flow charts etc?

I don't understand how this could be true when stock cars from the factory are running sometimes double that boost level stock with smaller turbos than the T518Z with 2.0 liter motors... (WRX, Pontiac Solstice etc)
I don't have the data, but a very well respected tuner on this board says the optimal efficiency for this turbo is 8-9psi. Since I don't know too much about the subject, I take the advice from people I know who do.

Having people double the psi on stock turbos isn't always a good idea, and definitely not something you should listen too. Again, if you don't plan on installing a headgasket, forget 12psi....or else you are looking at one expensive repair bill.
Old 04-24-2008, 06:59 AM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TRBOKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phillips Ranch 909!
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by NFRs2000NYC,Apr 23 2008, 11:17 PM
I don't have the data, but a very well respected tuner on this board says the optimal efficiency for this turbo is 8-9psi. Since I don't know too much about the subject, I take the advice from people I know who do.

Having people double the psi on stock turbos isn't always a good idea, and definitely not something you should listen too. Again, if you don't plan on installing a headgasket, forget 12psi....or else you are looking at one expensive repair bill.
Data is fact, everything else is just hearsay IMO.


I wasn't saying they were doubling the stock PSI in other cars, I was saying that their stock PSI is double of what you are saying is efficient for our turbo, yet their turbos are smaller than the one that comes in the greddy kit.
Old 04-24-2008, 07:01 AM
  #25  

 
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,298
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRBOKEV,Apr 24 2008, 01:56 AM
Do you have any data from Greddy to back up these claims of the turbo being inefficient past 9K? Flow charts etc?

I don't understand how this could be true when stock cars from the factory are running sometimes double that boost level stock with smaller turbos than the T518Z with 2.0 liter motors... (WRX, Pontiac Solstice etc)
Those motors don't rev to 9000rpms either where there is a MUCH higher flow requirement.

There was a board member who tried to run over 12psi and he said it just fell flat on its face after about 10psi.
Old 04-24-2008, 07:24 AM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TRBOKEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phillips Ranch 909!
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spec_Ops2087,Apr 24 2008, 07:01 AM
Those motors don't rev to 9000rpms either where there is a MUCH higher flow requirement.

There was a board member who tried to run over 12psi and he said it just fell flat on its face after about 10psi.
True but the solstice runs a much smaller turbo, has a 2.4 liter motor with a 7K red line and it runs 20 pounds of boost from the factory..

Subaru runs a 2.5 liter with a 7K red line and 14.7 pounds from the factory.


Kinda makes you think, as both of these cars run really small turbos stock, but with more displacement which makes for more flow.


I did see the post where a 3mm HG was installed and they tried to turn up the boost and it just stunk though. I agree that this turbo isn't going to work in those type of applications. Some of us just want to find out where the edge is with he kit.
Old 04-24-2008, 07:37 AM
  #27  
Former Sponsor
 
GT Motoring's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Chicago Burbs
Posts: 16,133
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRBOKEV,Apr 23 2008, 03:51 PM
In all honesty I was going to get the high flow cat, but I'm having trouble getting one right now. (I need one with a extra O2 bung welded for my wideband.)

Then today I saw a 63 mm test pipe for dirt cheap (60 bucks) and questioned weather or not just to get that instead...
Ive got the Random Tech 2.5in race cat pipes here, and extra o2 bungs here in stock. I can make something for you. Lemme know.
Old 04-24-2008, 09:54 AM
  #28  

 
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 10,298
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRBOKEV,Apr 24 2008, 10:24 AM
True but the solstice runs a much smaller turbo, has a 2.4 liter motor with a 7K red line and it runs 20 pounds of boost from the factory..

Subaru runs a 2.5 liter with a 7K red line and 14.7 pounds from the factory.


Kinda makes you think, as both of these cars run really small turbos stock, but with more displacement which makes for more flow.


I did see the post where a 3mm HG was installed and they tried to turn up the boost and it just stunk though. I agree that this turbo isn't going to work in those type of applications. Some of us just want to find out where the edge is with he kit.
I should have skipped the rpm comment entirely because its only a small factor. Its really the engines in general that have completely different flow characteristics as proven by your statements. Some can run this turbo to 15psi or whatever and make power. But some (like ours) can only go to about 10psi.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jst2878
S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum
26
05-27-2015 12:25 PM
hondabruh
S2000 Under The Hood
13
08-14-2014 07:48 AM
steve695
S2000 Modifications and Parts
14
04-15-2012 01:47 PM
GpWaP1 s2k
S2000 Modifications and Parts
10
04-27-2009 06:41 PM
rotary head
S2000 Modifications and Parts
14
05-25-2008 10:42 AM



Quick Reply: Test pipe or High Flow Cat for my turbo?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.