S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

AP1 AEM Tune - very low output after tune, 125kw

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-28-2018, 04:20 PM
  #21  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
yemodat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The factory ECU was limiting to 180kph but the AEM is not speed restricted.
Old 02-28-2018, 04:29 PM
  #22  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

3500-3700rpm is a typical lowered vtec point for this car out of the box if you have a test pipe. So nothing out of the ordinary there, unless you still have the stock cat still in place, and then i would be further suspect of the cam timing being off.

I'm not understanding what you mean about running out of gear on the dyno. It doesn't matter what your rear end gearing is, your only task is to run the car up to redline, hell you could do it in 1st gear if you wanted. But i find it curious that your run went up to 144 in 4th and down to 126 in 6th, something to consider there. Did you run the car up to redline in 4th gear? If not, why exactly?

A hub dyno reads higher then a typical roller dyno just fyi, because less drivetrain loss. Not to pour salt in the wound, but we are just trying to figure out if there is a problem or not. We dont do KW here, we do whp. So all we can do is take your word for it on what the stated average power output is on this tuners dyno for an s2000. 144 seems a lot closer then 125kw though. The power curve on dyno looks pretty normal though. Just down on peak power yield.
Old 02-28-2018, 04:52 PM
  #23  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
yemodat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Test pipe, no cat as per OP. The 144kw is 4th gear to redline, I have a blurry pic on my phone (my fault) which shows very similar torque and power plots to the 6th gear pull. I've noted to my tuner that when I return after doing my mech checks to re-run it in 4th, 5th and 6th.

My initial impressions with driving after the tune is that the mid-range torque different is vastly improved.

Also, I am grateful for your input and help thus far - no hurt feelings here, I just want to get to the bottom of it as it is a car I intend on keeping and using for trackdays for a very long time. I will keep in mind the power measurement - hp v kw; we use both here and 99% of the time its at the wheels/hubs. I don't think we have many roller dynos in NZ come to think of it - there are definitely more hub dynos than roller dynos.

I will do the usual tests as mentioned above in the coming week and report back.
Old 02-28-2018, 07:16 PM
  #24  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by yemodat
Test pipe, no cat as per OP. The 144kw is 4th gear to redline, I have a blurry pic on my phone (my fault) which shows very similar torque and power plots to the 6th gear pull. I've noted to my tuner that when I return after doing my mech checks to re-run it in 4th, 5th and 6th.

My initial impressions with driving after the tune is that the mid-range torque different is vastly improved.

Also, I am grateful for your input and help thus far - no hurt feelings here, I just want to get to the bottom of it as it is a car I intend on keeping and using for trackdays for a very long time. I will keep in mind the power measurement - hp v kw; we use both here and 99% of the time its at the wheels/hubs. I don't think we have many roller dynos in NZ come to think of it - there are definitely more hub dynos than roller dynos.

I will do the usual tests as mentioned above in the coming week and report back.
No problem, happy to help. These motors respond the most in the mid range after tuning because of its stock vtec engagement point. Sometimes the top end feels a little flat afterward, just because of the gain in mid, the vtec hit is gone and it sometimes the perception feels like the top end never comes on, even though it does. But as going back to my original post further back, you can always do a leakdown test to confirm the health of the engine, and double check the timing mark on the cam wheel when checking the valve lash to insure its at factory timing. Until then we are all just grabbing straws.
The following users liked this post:
yemodat (03-01-2018)
Old 02-28-2018, 10:45 PM
  #25  

 
flanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,059
Received 426 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

4th gear run 144kW x 1.36 = 196whp which doesn't seem that far off. That big dive just after 8000rpm is a bit weird though.
6th gear run 169Nm x 0.74 = 125lbft, looks like the torque is dropping way fast after 6000rpm which also seems a bit odd.
Check your valves and timing marks and do some new runs, hopefully you pick up all those lost kilowatts

Here is an old dyno from my AP1 with boltons just for comparison, this is also a dynapack and I think we used 4th gear (maybe 5th) but that shouldn't matter much.
Using a Berk HFC on this run which I later found did rob me 8-10whp up top.
The following users liked this post:
yemodat (03-01-2018)
Old 03-01-2018, 11:16 AM
  #26  

 
Scigheras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 506
Received 74 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flanders
Using a Berk HFC on this run which I later found did rob me 8-10whp up top.
What did you mean by this? Replacing it with a test pipe made 8-10whp?
Old 03-01-2018, 11:29 AM
  #27  

 
flanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,059
Received 426 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Yes it made a very big impact, maybe because of my ITB's, not sure.
The following users liked this post:
Scigheras (03-02-2018)
Old 03-01-2018, 12:22 PM
  #28  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
yemodat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

flanders - I've been reading your build thread, it's very impressive and I actually stumbled across it awhile ago when I was looking at the air pump delete.

My car is with my race mechanic now for a compression and leakdown test. I've asked him to take some photos of the timing and to check the cam timing itself. Fingers crossed!
Old 03-01-2018, 02:16 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Bruunz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 210
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

For reference, my 2001 AP1 @ 161,000kms got 130rwkw on a roller dyno - 4th gear pull / stock diff. Only mod was Injen cold air intake and it was on shitty 18" wheels. I think it had 225/30 tyres on it at the time.

MCM's s2k achieved a similar result. I believe they got 132rwkw when they did their initial tests with a CAI as well. Stock wheels / tyres. Not sure if this was before or after exhaust.

If you want i can dig around for a picture of my run if you want.

Last edited by Bruunz; 03-01-2018 at 02:16 PM. Reason: Typos
Old 03-01-2018, 03:27 PM
  #30  
Registered User

Thread Starter
 
yemodat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 28
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It looks like we have found the culprit - timing was out. I'm surprised the factory ECU ran with the timing being slightly out. It had no problems starting up or running through the revs so it's interesting that it's come this way

Compression has been retested - 225-225-225-220 on their gauge. He said that's what he would expect from a high compression motor on his gauges. Valves being adjusted this afternoon. I won't be able to book my tuner for at least a couple of weeks from now, but it's all looking positive.

Hopefully I'm not speaking too early but the takeaway from this is to double check the basics especially if an engine has been rebuilt.

Video screenshot attached from the mechanic - apologies for sizing/quality etc. but clear to see its not quite right here.


Quick Reply: AP1 AEM Tune - very low output after tune, 125kw



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:41 PM.