S2000 Naturally Aspirated Forum Discussions about N/A motor projects, builds and technology.

F24C Long Rod Engine Build 2.4L

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-24-2018, 02:59 PM
  #231  

 
jinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 22
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Probably requiring either custom pistons or custom rods and a sleeve, it should be possible to take it to 2.5 without much drama.
2.5 L is doable on the on the F block' 224 mm deck height, but I think Rod Stroke Ratio will suffer more compare to K24 231 mm deck height.

Hypothetically w/ a K20 Cylinder Head mounting design, I think custom rods & pistons are required because "let's say" if this mounting design is plate/adaptor between the F Series Block & K20 Cylinder Head; the compression will suffer w/ stock F Series Pistons.
Old 01-24-2018, 03:08 PM
  #232  

 
jinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 22
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mrsideways
Personal want to see a K24 Block, F22 crank, F20 (sized rods) with custom piston and K head for turbo use. Get a nice rod ratio, and nice thick head on the piston for boost. I have a spare K24 block..... Hmmmmmm
Would F20 Rods be too short for the K24 deck height decreasing from 99 mm to 90.7 mm Stroke?
The F20 Rods are 1 mm longer > K24 Rods

Stock Deck Height
K20: 212 mm
K24: 231.5 mm
F20C: 224 mm

Rod Length
K24: 152 mm
F20C: 153 mm
F22C: 149.65 mm
Old 01-25-2018, 11:18 AM
  #233  

 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jinn
Would F20 Rods be too short for the K24 deck height decreasing from 99 mm to 90.7 mm Stroke?
The F20 Rods are 1 mm longer > K24 Rods

Stock Deck Height
K20: 212 mm
K24: 231.5 mm
F20C: 224 mm

Rod Length
K24: 152 mm
F20C: 153 mm
F22C: 149.65 mm
The idea was brought up by real street. Sounded to me like they had done it.
Old 01-25-2018, 01:55 PM
  #234  

 
S2kAndTheAnt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 703->781->626
Posts: 1,697
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cheddaboy
Check out this K20/F20C motor built by Mugen

https://honda-tech.com/articles/hond...mpaign=content

Thanks for BLOWING MY MIND!
Old 01-26-2018, 01:27 AM
  #235  

 
Mike RT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 478
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default


If you scroll to 12:22 in the video, you will see that the 2016 iteration of the J's Racing S2000 "F20C" is 2,670cc ! I wonder what they did to achieve that.....????
Old 01-26-2018, 05:02 AM
  #236  

 
jinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 22
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mike RT4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3t742T1GwUs

If you scroll to 12:22 in the video, you will see that the 2016 iteration of the J's Racing S2000 "F20C" is 2,670cc ! I wonder what they did to achieve that.....????

Maybe J's RACING double stacked BALLADE's Deck Plate, then asked TODA to produce longer Rods lol
Old 01-26-2018, 04:36 PM
  #237  

 
Chibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 1,321
Received 123 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

7800 rev limit, interesting.

Seemed like they limped the M3 around. Then again, they are running 900/1400lb springs, which is kinda insane. I don't know why Japan tuners seem to go ****ing insane spring rate wise compared to the rest of the world. 700/1000lb is more normal on the E90 M3.
Old 01-27-2018, 01:30 AM
  #238  

 
flanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,059
Received 426 Likes on 362 Posts
Default

Yeah it almost makes you wonder if they use a different kind of spring rate unit
Old 01-27-2018, 08:04 AM
  #239  

 
Chibo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, Az
Posts: 1,321
Received 123 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flanders
Yeah it almost makes you wonder if they use a different kind of spring rate unit
I converted the rates before posting
Old 01-29-2018, 11:59 AM
  #240  

 
Slowcrash_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,228
Received 405 Likes on 339 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flanders
Yeah it almost makes you wonder if they use a different kind of spring rate unit
Originally Posted by Chibo
7800 rev limit, interesting.

Seemed like they limped the M3 around. Then again, they are running 900/1400lb springs, which is kinda insane. I don't know why Japan tuners seem to go ****ing insane spring rate wise compared to the rest of the world. 700/1000lb is more normal on the E90 M3.
the motion ratios on e92 basically means the wheel rate is 2.5x less than the spring rate. Wereas our motion ratio means our wheel rate is much closer to the spring rate.


Quick Reply: F24C Long Rod Engine Build 2.4L



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 PM.