S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Any issues with the latest runs of Canton oil pans?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-22-2019, 09:36 AM
  #11  
Registered User

 
usafstud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SC
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

any improvement with the heat dissipation with (newer) canton oil pan?
Old 02-22-2019, 09:48 AM
  #12  
Community Organizer

 
freq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in my garage
Posts: 20,991
Received 185 Likes on 163 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by usafstud
any improvement with the heat dissipation with (newer) canton oil pan?
Would you really expect that kind of data from the manufacturer? Would you accept that data as fact if they gave you any?

Has the pan material changed from the old one? Has the oil capacity changed from the old design?
Old 02-22-2019, 03:01 PM
  #13  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

The install article is interesting...someone spent a lot of effort for a product on a 20-year-old car 10 years out of production.

As I understand it, there the stock S2000 pan is pretty advanced for a street pan. There are several simple baffles. But there are only 2 trap-door baffled alternatives: Moroso's that welds into the stock pan and Canton's. Canton's seems to have a more complete trap-door baffle system but loses the cooling of the finned aluminum pan. It also has ports for an oil temp sensor and a turbo drain back.

The Canton pan looks pretty slick. A dry sump could cost 8x to 12x as much and adds plumbing issues.

Old 02-24-2019, 05:53 AM
  #14  

 
gtracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 161
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I would be inclined to believe them. I have one of their first batch and was visibly crooked and spoke with them. Gave me clear instructions and I put a lot of sealant and it’s fine.
Old 02-24-2019, 08:14 AM
  #15  

 
davidc1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,685
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Here's a newer picture...I think of the actual pan MotoIQ has. Notice the holes along the antislosh plate. It will be interesting to see what Mike and the guys at MotoIQ think of it. I respect them, and Mike is a good writer as well.
Old 02-24-2019, 05:25 PM
  #16  

Thread Starter
 
Sickdayracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 703
Received 101 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

There is no reason to upgrade the pan on these cars or add a baffle/anti-slosh plate. The sump is so low that it's basically kissing the bottom of the pan. As long as you have proper oil levels you won't have an issue even on ultra sticky tires.

You are opening up yourself up to leaks and other issues with the Canton pan. You are potentially risking your motor with an anti slosh plate. Our motors run at very high PSI and they can inhibit oil flow back to the sump. Honda designed this car to go on the track albeit not with Hoosiers, the car handles them just fine.

Here is a video from testing today at Summit Point. The gauges are Oil Pressure, Oil Temp, and Water temp, in that order. The red warning light is setup to flash if the oil pressure drops below 20psi, (which it does at warm idle). Notice the oil pressure fluctuates slightly but stays 80psi + everywhere, even on the long right hand sweeping T10 at Summit. I check oil every session and have done so for 3 seasons on this and have no issues to speak of. The car is on Hoosier R7s. Factory pan with Mishimoto Oil Cooler.

Old 02-28-2019, 07:55 AM
  #17  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sickdayracing
There is no reason to upgrade the pan on these cars or add a baffle/anti-slosh plate. The sump is so low that it's basically kissing the bottom of the pan. As long as you have proper oil levels you won't have an issue even on ultra sticky tires.

You are opening up yourself up to leaks and other issues with the Canton pan. You are potentially risking your motor with an anti slosh plate. Our motors run at very high PSI and they can inhibit oil flow back to the sump. Honda designed this car to go on the track albeit not with Hoosiers, the car handles them just fine.

Here is a video from testing today at Summit Point. The gauges are Oil Pressure, Oil Temp, and Water temp, in that order. The red warning light is setup to flash if the oil pressure drops below 20psi, (which it does at warm idle). Notice the oil pressure fluctuates slightly but stays 80psi + everywhere, even on the long right hand sweeping T10 at Summit. I check oil every session and have done so for 3 seasons on this and have no issues to speak of. The car is on Hoosier R7s. Factory pan with Mishimoto Oil Cooler.
All of the gauges seem close to rock steady. Do they have a fair amount of damping that may be masking the actual reading? Have you recorded the oil pressure to a data acquisition system?
Old 03-02-2019, 06:13 PM
  #18  

Thread Starter
 
Sickdayracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 703
Received 101 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
All of the gauges seem close to rock steady. Do they have a fair amount of damping that may be masking the actual reading? Have you recorded the oil pressure to a data acquisition system?
The oil pressure is remote mounted. Oil pressure stays steady at high rpm and under load. I also have a the 20psi warning pressure switch remote mounted.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dhfreak
S2000 Under The Hood
26
06-22-2012 07:06 AM
s2k16803
S2000 Forced Induction
16
04-09-2012 08:52 AM
F20C1
S2000 Under The Hood
8
07-20-2008 06:10 PM
Dragonhalf
S2000 Forced Induction
7
03-24-2007 04:21 PM



Quick Reply: Any issues with the latest runs of Canton oil pans?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 AM.