In-Car Video Setup
#11
Registered User
Originally Posted by WarrenW,Nov 3 2005, 08:27 PM
However, us television professionals (and I AM one) don't use mini dv cameras, we use BROADCAST cameras. Ones like these:
Warren
Warren
#12
Registered User
Originally Posted by vroom,Nov 3 2005, 03:36 PM
Yeah but Warren, with all that weight that things gonna cost ya at least a few 10ths on the autocross...
The intent of my post was to tell the original poster, cthree, that those handycams are not used for professional television production unless it would be put in a place where you can't risk losing a $50,000 professional camera. But then, maybe that's what cthree was using it for, he just wasn't too clear with his explanation.
Now, back to the topic of this thread...
Warren
#13
Administrator
Originally Posted by WarrenW,Nov 3 2005, 01:27 PM
Say what??? I think you mean standard fare when a lipstick or micro camera is needed. It sure isn't standard fare for shooting interviews and standard programs. Sticking it on the hood of a car, the side of a boat, something like that I can understand.
For clarity consider reading the topic title "In-Car Video Setup"
#14
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sunny Los Angeles
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A quick update:
The Mustek recorder's 'high quality' setting is only 320x240 pixels, which is definitely inferior to what you'd get from most camcorder formats.
For computer use, the 320x240 is fine. The following videos are all blown up to 640x480, which increases the image area four-fold, and naturally hurts the image quality. If you have the Windows Viewer show them at half size, you'll see the recording in its native size. It's not bad.
Each of the clips are WMV and about 10 megs.
This video compares the recording quality of the Mustek PVR and my Canon Mini-DV camcorder:
PVR versus DV
The next two videos compare the newer Sony SuperHAD bullet camera and the older HAD one. It also shows the picture-in-picture setup.
The first clip, recorded to the Mustek PVR:
Camera comparison to DV
The second clip, recorded to Mini-DV:
Camera comparison to PVR
The Mustek recorder's 'high quality' setting is only 320x240 pixels, which is definitely inferior to what you'd get from most camcorder formats.
For computer use, the 320x240 is fine. The following videos are all blown up to 640x480, which increases the image area four-fold, and naturally hurts the image quality. If you have the Windows Viewer show them at half size, you'll see the recording in its native size. It's not bad.
Each of the clips are WMV and about 10 megs.
This video compares the recording quality of the Mustek PVR and my Canon Mini-DV camcorder:
PVR versus DV
The next two videos compare the newer Sony SuperHAD bullet camera and the older HAD one. It also shows the picture-in-picture setup.
The first clip, recorded to the Mustek PVR:
Camera comparison to DV
The second clip, recorded to Mini-DV:
Camera comparison to PVR
#16
Heh-heh, here's the one SpeedTV uses -- that's TK interviewing our own ultimate lurker (OK, now TOV owns him ):
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=438223
Still don't think it'll fit under the seat.
Now back to your regularly-scheduled thread...
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=438223
Still don't think it'll fit under the seat.
Now back to your regularly-scheduled thread...
#17
Registered User
I've never understood Sony's pricing of the Video Walkman. The MiniDV version has a 4" LCD display and can record a video signal to MiniDV media. It costs $1300. However, the DCR-HC32 video recorder also has the ability to record an external video signal to MiniDV, plus has it's own 20x optical zoom lens! Albeit the display is only 2.5", but that's why you watch the stuff on a computer or TV. I simply don't understand why anybody would purchase the Video Walkman over a regular MiniDV camcorder?
Heck, the Digital8 Video Walkman that doesn't even have a screen is still $700! Compare that to the $350 recorder that can record externally as well.
ps - JackOlsen, thanks for the info about the camera with the settable exposure. I have a ConeCam that's useless when mounted in the car because everything outside is a nearly featureless white blur.
Heck, the Digital8 Video Walkman that doesn't even have a screen is still $700! Compare that to the $350 recorder that can record externally as well.
ps - JackOlsen, thanks for the info about the camera with the settable exposure. I have a ConeCam that's useless when mounted in the car because everything outside is a nearly featureless white blur.
#18
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Fernando Valley, CA
Posts: 3,962
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
6 Posts
The other thing I noticed experimenting with my camcorder is that the tape mechanism doesn't take to kindly to the bumps, vibration and rattling that goes on during "spirited" driving. My Canon GL-1 takes excellent video hanging off my camera mount between the roll hoops, but you do see rapid subtle brightness changed "flickering" caused by all the shaking when the road starts to get slightly rough or in the canyons.
Remotely mounted cameras piped into the recorder strapped to a seat improves it a lot, but a solid-state recorder would be best if the resolution is adequate. It's a helluva lot less bulky too. The only problem is that DV is so much easier to edit than MPEG video.
Finally, syncing the video isn't an issue if you use a 2 or 4 in one color video multiplexer (like those used for security cameras). Pipe all the video into the box, set up the output (PIP, one camera, two cameras or more) and record the ouput to one video recorder. Everything is synced from the get-go.
Remotely mounted cameras piped into the recorder strapped to a seat improves it a lot, but a solid-state recorder would be best if the resolution is adequate. It's a helluva lot less bulky too. The only problem is that DV is so much easier to edit than MPEG video.
Finally, syncing the video isn't an issue if you use a 2 or 4 in one color video multiplexer (like those used for security cameras). Pipe all the video into the box, set up the output (PIP, one camera, two cameras or more) and record the ouput to one video recorder. Everything is synced from the get-go.
#19
Registered User
Originally Posted by twohoos,Nov 4 2005, 12:49 PM
Heh-heh, here's the one SpeedTV uses -- that's TK interviewing our own ultimate lurker (OK, now TOV owns him ):
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=438223
Still don't think it'll fit under the seat.
Now back to your regularly-scheduled thread...
http://www.vtec.net/news/news-item?news_item_id=438223
Still don't think it'll fit under the seat.
Now back to your regularly-scheduled thread...
Warren
#20
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Posts: 21,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you can always consider your options...
http://www.xtremex3.com/en/products/
I believe the setup is around 3g's
http://www.xtremex3.com/en/products/
I believe the setup is around 3g's