S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Importance of Rake in setting suspension heights

Old 07-22-2018, 09:03 AM
  #21  

Thread Starter
 
DanielB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 556
Received 75 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by md6380
I’ve been meaning to try less rake. I may do so for my next autocross, but won’t have time for another alignment. What happens to alignment in the front if I raise it? Increase positive camber, but what else?
As others said, toe will change. But it's not hard to reset in your garage with a few boards and tape measures.
Old 07-22-2018, 09:04 AM
  #22  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chibo
As has been mentioned, there are a bunch of factors in play. My car does this too, but I can usually add more throttle or get back on earlier to come back to being neutral or oversteer (if I need it). Trying to find real consistency to compare small changes is incredibly difficult, as I'm sure you know

Also, since you mentioned numbers, I am 324mm / 318mm.
Penske DAs with 850lb / 600lb springs
Karcepts STR bars, one step off full hard up front, change the rear depending but I usually use the softest 3 pairs holes and this is all I really mess with at the track if I want the car to rotate more or less easily.
17x9 +45 w/ 255/40 square
DTC-60 stock rotors / HP+ Urge rotors rear
No aero

I have no idea where you live, but you're welcome to drive the car if we end up at the same event. Always good to compare notes.
That sounds like a very nice, well thought out suspension setup!

Some questions:

On suspension: Karcepts has different torsion tubes for their bars, which ones are you using. How did you modify to allow for more camber and how much camber are you running? Did you use lowering blocks (i.e. roll center adjusters) to get the additional camber? Which piston did you use in the Penske shocks (linear/linear, digressive/digressive, etc.)? Was any additional low speed bleed added? What are the reference points for you ride height measurement? Penske told me the 7500DA didn't have a lot of room for lowering.

On brakes; Are you using front brake ducts? Did you consider using the Girodisc or other two-piece floating front rotors, since the car now has 2-piece rear rotors?

On tires: Do the +45 rims rub the fenders? Why did you chose them over the +60s often used with 9" rims? Are you running under rules that limit your car to 9" rims or was there a different reason for not using wider rims and tires (e.g. a 265/35-18 or 275/35-18 on a 10" rim which would have about 1" more tread width)?
Old 07-23-2018, 07:55 AM
  #23  

Thread Starter
 
DanielB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 556
Received 75 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

While we're discussing ride heights, what is the consensus if it should be set with the driver (or equivalent weight) in the seat? I made some basic assumptions about where the driver's center of gravity would be relative to left/right and front/rear and it seems that for me (~180 lbs driving weight) that I add ~40 lbs more weight over the left rear wheel than the right (I'm assuming the left/right spit to be 1/3 to the right, 2/3 to the left) and the same front to rear. With 11kg/mm springs that would mean the left rear was compressed ~2 mm more than the right. Does this make much of a difference? My instincts say no, but curious if anyone has tried both approaches and can share if there were noticeable differences on the track.
Old 07-23-2018, 09:00 AM
  #24  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanielB
While we're discussing ride heights, what is the consensus if it should be set with the driver (or equivalent weight) in the seat? I made some basic assumptions about where the driver's center of gravity would be relative to left/right and front/rear and it seems that for me (~180 lbs driving weight) that I add ~40 lbs more weight over the left rear wheel than the right (I'm assuming the left/right spit to be 1/3 to the right, 2/3 to the left) and the same front to rear. With 11kg/mm springs that would mean the left rear was compressed ~2 mm more than the right. Does this make much of a difference? My instincts say no, but curious if anyone has tried both approaches and can share if there were noticeable differences on the track.
The answer is corner balance the car. Yes it makes a difference. In order to get a proper balance, you need to have driver weight in the seat. The driver side of the car will typically have a slightly higher ride height then the passenger side as a result.
The following users liked this post:
DavidNJ (07-23-2018)
Old 07-23-2018, 04:27 PM
  #25  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

To approximate the driver, I take the wheel weights with the driver in the car, then place dumbells in the driver's seat and the floor in front of the seat until the scales read the same.

Note that ride height and wheel weight are closely related. Making a ride height adjustment by itself will most likely put add wedge in the suspension.
Old 07-24-2018, 06:25 AM
  #26  

Thread Starter
 
DanielB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 556
Received 75 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Note that ride height and wheel weight are closely related. Making a ride height adjustment by itself will most likely put add wedge in the suspension.
Great point that I hadn't thought about. I've been debating buying a set of scales vs. having a local race shop do a corner balance. I'm leaning towards the latter as I have my doubts that the stands I've created to do alignment in my garage are within 1 mm of each other in height. I leveled them with a long construction level but 1 mm (or even a bit more) is within the tolerance for reading the bubble over the width of the car. And with 11k springs, being 1 mm off means 22 lbs off - all else equal.
Old 07-24-2018, 07:23 AM
  #27  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DanielB
Great point that I hadn't thought about. I've been debating buying a set of scales vs. having a local race shop do a corner balance. I'm leaning towards the latter as I have my doubts that the stands I've created to do alignment in my garage are within 1 mm of each other in height. I leveled them with a long construction level but 1 mm (or even a bit more) is within the tolerance for reading the bubble over the width of the car. And with 11k springs, being 1 mm off means 22 lbs off - all else equal.
The scales need to be level. They sell expensive leveling pads for the scales, some with a roll-on, roll-off to remove any reload from the adjustment which often requires raising the car to reach the shock barrel. Some include ramps. I just use a combination of Masonite sheet I cut into squares and thinner vinyl tile sheets. To check level I originally used a large diameter clear plastic tube filled with colored water attached to shock stands. These day I use a laser level. Once the shims needed are determined, the position in the garage can be marked and the shims just thrown in to place each time the car is weighed.

With oval racing bias ply tires and stagger, scaling the car was a weekly event. With radial tires that may be less important, although tire wear may affect ride height and wedge.

Typically, ride was measured from the frame rail to the ground rather than a reference on the bodywork. In autocross, SCCA specifies the shock length as the ride height measurement.

This pictures shows a scale leveler attached to a platform, a raised stand that lets the tuner work under the car, two different hub stands that take the tire out of the picture giving a consistent reading and allowing more suspension access, and a stand with a roll-on, roll-off provision. There are also plates that let the stand slide to relieve preset. Not shown are a wide variety of ride height measurement tools that slide under the car to reach the frame rails.




Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jmpu671
S2000 Under The Hood
10
12-09-2015 12:13 PM
hybridb18
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
7
08-05-2013 08:04 PM
s2kVABeachCruiser
S2000 Talk
0
10-25-2005 03:06 PM
spoonfed
S2000 Talk
0
03-04-2003 09:20 AM


Quick Reply: Importance of Rake in setting suspension heights



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 PM.