S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Interesting Head and Neck Restraint Article

Old 03-21-2018, 02:33 AM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default Interesting Head and Neck Restraint Article

A bit of history. HANS was a company founded by Jim Downing and developed the HANS device. Safety Solutions was another company that made the 'Hutchins Device' which was a competitor. It was founded by Trevor Ashline. Simpson bought both companies and Ashline works for Simpson now.

So...Safety Solutions made all sorts of claims for their device vs. the HANS, but after Simpson purchased everyone that info disappeared. This article, from 2012, has some of that info: Head and Neck Restraint Systems: Comparisons & Politics | Go Ahead - Take the Wheel

The real meat is in this table:

Upper Neck Tension at a 68G /Hit for the HANS and Safety Solutions Hybrid Pro Rage:
The lower the number, the better. The R3 does not yield as good test results as the Hybrid Pro Rage but Safety Solutions claims it still performs better than the HANS system. We were unable to obtain the R3 test numbers.

0 degrees (frontal impact)
HANS 210 lbs 934.1 Newtons
Safety Solutions 69 lbs 306.9 Newtons

30 degrees
HANS 494 lbs 2197.4 Newtons
Safety Solutions 22 lbs 97.9 Newtons

40 degrees
HANS 538 lbs 2393.1 Newtons
Safety Solutions 153 lbs 680.6 Newtons

Wile the R3, now called the Hybrid S, is popular here and with instructors because it can be used with 3-pt OEM belts, apparently the regular hybrid is their key product.

Also note, only the Hybrids, like the Schroth SHR, work with different seat back angles without adjustment.

Not an S2000 issue, but it looks like the Hybrid's straps won't let a dual shoulder strap 9-pt harness to be used.
Old 03-21-2018, 01:54 PM
  #2  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Safety Solutions had and the Simpson Hybrids have a second pair of tethers safety solutions called a "Side Stabilizing Gusset" (SSG) that creates a triangle of tethers on each side. Safety Solutions promoted that as the reason they were better than the HANS in off-center accidents.



They also had, and now have, as an option on most models, a "Seatbelt Anchor System (SAS)". Since they charge $40 extra for it on the Pro and "Sport models, it is described as the "optional patented SAS (Seatbelt Anchor System) for even greater coverage in flips, barrel rolls, and side impacts." It is unclear if that is an area where the HANS, which comes up behind the helmet and drapes over the chest, has a natural advantage or if this gives the Hybrid an advantage over the HANS. The Hybrid Pro and Sport modes are FIA and SFI certified without the SAS. The Hybrid S model is FIA certified with the SAS. The SAS is standard on that model but not used in 3-pt mode.
Old 03-21-2018, 02:02 PM
  #3  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Another thing along the same vein is the approximately $50 Shock Doctor Helmet Ejection System, also sold with OEM branding by Simpson and others. It provides rescue workers with a bladder between the driver's head and the helmet using an air pump that rescue/medical crews should have. That allows helmet removal without exacerbating spinal injuries. About $50.

The following users liked this post:
robrob (03-22-2018)
Old 03-22-2018, 03:25 AM
  #4  

 
bgoetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,730
Received 56 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

On reason I am going with the Hybrid is because I instruct. I know it is debatable if it works with a 3 point, but why not wear it. The new Hybrid S has even been tested to work, but looking at the Hybrid vs the Hybrid S the difference isn’t a whole lot. IMO if you instruct any hybrid type system is a good choice.
The following users liked this post:
robrob (03-22-2018)
Old 03-24-2018, 09:12 PM
  #5  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Interesting, looking at today's TV coverage it seems all the F1 and NASCAR drivers are using a version of the HANS device (F1 is limited to FIA certification, NASCAR uses Snell). It seems the F1 drivers are using a model from Stand 21 on their international website.
Old 03-28-2018, 11:00 AM
  #6  

 
spontaneous123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default


Have been taking a course regarding impact biomechanics at uni and this video was in one of the lectures.

Even at 30mph, there is a significant reduction in tension/flexion with a slight increase in compressive but well below standard tolerances
Old 03-28-2018, 06:19 PM
  #7  

Thread Starter
 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spontaneous123

Have been taking a course regarding impact biomechanics at uni and this video was in one of the lectures.

Even at 30mph, there is a significant reduction in tension/flexion with a slight increase in compressive but well below standard tolerances
Do you have access to:

2013-10-14
Developments in Modern Racecar Driver Crash Protection and Safety-Engineering Beyond Performance PT-160

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-3516
Citation: Melvin, J., Begeman, P., and Foster, C., "Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints Revisited," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-3516, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-3516.
Download Citation
Author(s): John W. Melvin, Paul C. Begeman, Craig D. Foster
Affiliated: Bioengineering Center, Wayne State University
Pages: 16
Event: Motorsports Engineering Conference & Exposition
Old 03-29-2018, 10:45 PM
  #8  

 
spontaneous123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Do you have access to:

2013-10-14
Developments in Modern Racecar Driver Crash Protection and Safety-Engineering Beyond Performance PT-160

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-3516
Citation: Melvin, J., Begeman, P., and Foster, C., "Sled Test Evaluation of Racecar Head/Neck Restraints Revisited," SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-3516, 2004, https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-3516.
Download Citation
Author(s): John W. Melvin, Paul C. Begeman, Craig D. Foster
Affiliated: Bioengineering Center, Wayne State University
Pages: 16
Event: Motorsports Engineering Conference & Exposition
Unfortunately, I do not.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lude9285
S2000 Under The Hood
0
11-03-2009 04:33 PM
TelosHedge
S2000 Forced Induction
2
11-10-2008 07:35 AM
Jacksparrow
S2000 Under The Hood
2
10-13-2008 10:43 AM
jwocky
Car and Bike Talk
45
02-20-2008 07:57 PM
mdavis
S2000 Talk
22
07-12-2002 06:57 PM


Quick Reply: Interesting Head and Neck Restraint Article



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 PM.