S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

K24 into S2000 Race car SCCA build

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-25-2018, 08:56 AM
  #841  

Thread Starter
 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
400hp you can do with your current engine NA, with different cam, maybe different heads, and letting it rev.

Luke said the engine was 600hp on pump gas, which could be managed without too much fanfare. At worst, there are nice sequential gearboxes that can handle it. If you want to do some work, a BMW M3 DCT could be adapted; Garage Whifbiz did that for the Supra using a Syvecs S6+(they are a dealer). A modern ECU will let you run traction control to keep everything under control, even incorporating a yaw sensor, g-sensor, steering angle, and throttle position. With DBW, you should be able to change the throttle sensitivity curve to also make it more drivable. Throttle maps and tire wear - OptimumG

The extra power also lets you get more aggressive with downforce.

What class are you currently targeting? ST3?
Difference is, I'm hoping to make 400hp from 5000 rpm to 75000rpm. Not 9500 to 9501 then boom.
Old 06-25-2018, 10:33 AM
  #842  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrsideways
Difference is, I'm hoping to make 400hp from 5000 rpm to 75000rpm. Not 9500 to 9501 then boom.
Not quite that fragile...a more or less flat torque peaking at around 400 hp. Assuming quality parts on the valvetrain and bottom end, the engine should be quite solid in the engine builders recommended rev range. 5000-7500 is the rev range for a pushrod V8, a VTEC I4 with roller rockers, smaller valves, smaller diameter, much lighter pistons and shorter, lighter rods should handle quite a few additional revs. For the practical issues of oval and road racing, I'd like a little broader power band, maybe 40% of the range. For a 7500 rpm redline that would be 4500-7500. There are times where traffic or a slow corner could force a shift that a little more grunt would let you avoid.

At 5k that is 420 lb-ft of torque, at 7500 it is 280. Are you planning on a declining torque curve to maintain constant power? Of torque dropped off 10% at peak, it would be ~550hp at 7500 rpm.

BTW, your radiator...the one with the air intake...may be far and away the best solution for this application, both cooling the engine and providing lower temp air into the turbo. I'm always amazed how many S2000s feed the turbo with air heated by the intercooler, oil cooler, A/C, and radiator. I'm also surprised all the 800hp turbo S2000s aren't knocking your door down asking for one.
Old 06-25-2018, 11:02 AM
  #843  

 
gtracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 161
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
Not quite that fragile...a more or less flat torque peaking at around 400 hp. Assuming quality parts on the valvetrain and bottom end, the engine should be quite solid in the engine builders recommended rev range. 5000-7500 is the rev range for a pushrod V8, a VTEC I4 with roller rockers, smaller valves, smaller diameter, much lighter pistons and shorter, lighter rods should handle quite a few additional revs. For the practical issues of oval and road racing, I'd like a little broader power band, maybe 40% of the range. For a 7500 rpm redline that would be 4500-7500. There are times where traffic or a slow corner could force a shift that a little more grunt would let you avoid.

At 5k that is 420 lb-ft of torque, at 7500 it is 280. Are you planning on a declining torque curve to maintain constant power? Of torque dropped off 10% at peak, it would be ~550hp at 7500 rpm.

BTW, your radiator...the one with the air intake...may be far and away the best solution for this application, both cooling the engine and providing lower temp air into the turbo. I'm always amazed how many S2000s feed the turbo with air heated by the intercooler, oil cooler, A/C, and radiator. I'm also surprised all the 800hp turbo S2000s aren't knocking your door down asking for one.
Air intake pick up point on a turbo setup isnt nearly as important as N/A. The air then gets cooled by the intercooler. It does not get heated by the intercooler.... Do you have any idea how much the air gets heated when its compressed, nevermind going through a Turbo that's not too cold to start with?

A proper intercooler will be much more effective at keeping IATs down compared to a "CAI" on a turbo setup.
Old 06-25-2018, 01:32 PM
  #844  

Thread Starter
 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ

At 5k that is 420 lb-ft of torque, at 7500 it is 280. Are you planning on a declining torque curve to maintain constant power? Of torque dropped off 10% at peak, it would be ~550hp at 7500 rpm.

.
Stock head, Stock cams, Small turbo. I don't expect it to make "crazy" hp numbers. I bet the torque peaks in the 5k range. We will see. New to the turbo thing. Just getting my feet wet. I want it to make 15psi by 3k rpm. Thats the hope.
Old 06-25-2018, 04:31 PM
  #845  

 
gtracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 161
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrsideways
Stock head, Stock cams, Small turbo. I don't expect it to make "crazy" hp numbers. I bet the torque peaks in the 5k range. We will see. New to the turbo thing. Just getting my feet wet. I want it to make 15psi by 3k rpm. Thats the hope.
15psi by 3000rpm may be a bit optimistic. 3800rpm may be more realistic. Depends on your turbo but still. 3800 for 15psi seems more plausible.
If you want to help with response, you can make the hot side of the piping a bit smaller than the cold side. 2" vs 2.5" for example.
Old 06-26-2018, 07:57 AM
  #846  

Thread Starter
 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtracer
15psi by 3000rpm may be a bit optimistic. 3800rpm may be more realistic. Depends on your turbo but still. 3800 for 15psi seems more plausible.
If you want to help with response, you can make the hot side of the piping a bit smaller than the cold side. 2" vs 2.5" for example.
it's a G25 so it should spool like a GTX28. I don't know we will see. It has 2.4L to work with vs 2.2 on a F series.
Old 06-26-2018, 10:28 AM
  #847  

 
gtracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 161
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mrsideways
it's a G25 so it should spool like a GTX28. I don't know we will see. It has 2.4L to work with vs 2.2 on a F series.
Will be an interesting setup! Should boost fairly quickly, making it a useful powerband! I was looking at numbers from 9th Civic with the K24 and a gt30 but they have the built in ehxaust mani which should have a negative impact.. Should be closer to 3400rpm. But either way, thats a very good RPM range and useful for the track!

Whats your estimated time of completion?
Old 06-26-2018, 10:45 AM
  #848  

Thread Starter
 
Mrsideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Orlando
Posts: 2,723
Received 39 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gtracer
Will be an interesting setup! Should boost fairly quickly, making it a useful powerband! I was looking at numbers from 9th Civic with the K24 and a gt30 but they have the built in ehxaust mani which should have a negative impact.. Should be closer to 3400rpm. But either way, thats a very good RPM range and useful for the track!

Whats your estimated time of completion?
Pulled N/A motor a week ago and sent it to the body shop to paint the engine bay. Tree next to it got struck by lighting yesterday and some of it fell on the car. I went to see it last night. Its fine. But they want to take care of it. It will likely be at the body shop a few weeks now. I think the delay is more taking care of the tree and the other customer cars (some of which got totalled) then dealing with mine.
Old 06-26-2018, 12:02 PM
  #849  
Registered User

 
the-moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 547
Received 52 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

You have the worst luck
Old 06-26-2018, 12:13 PM
  #850  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Idea: Send the NA engine to 4P to convert to FI. They could change the pistons and cams leaving a strong, reliable built engine.


Quick Reply: K24 into S2000 Race car SCCA build



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:13 AM.