Nasa tt5
#23
The following 2 users liked this post by ndogg:
f20kills (12-01-2017),
s2000ellier (12-01-2017)
The following users liked this post:
f20kills (12-01-2017)
The following users liked this post:
f20kills (12-01-2017)
The following 2 users liked this post by Sickdayracing:
f20kills (12-01-2017),
insanedohc (12-05-2017)
#30
So here is the problem with that double wishbone modifier. A 987.2 Cayman Non-S can easily be in the power to weight ratio for TT5, Also has strut suspension so no modifer, Has better aero then an S2000 AND has a lower CG due to a flat motor with a better weight distribution and takes no points for needing a brake kit. It's the car to have for TT5..... way to go Greenbaum you just handed an already overdog and even bigger advantage by trying to punish cars you over the years have shown an obvious dislike for in order to try to help cars that suck and will never be competitive.