S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

New review of AP Racing BBK from Urge Designs

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2015, 12:59 PM
  #11  

 
Sylvan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would caution against making statements like this in general, since the answer usually is "it depends". We don't know the exact moment of inertia of this rotor vs. other kits. While the diameter is less, they are thicker and have more vanes than competing products. So without doing actual measurements or inside knowledge of the CAD files we are just guessing at moment of inertia. Having said that, for two disks of identical moment of inertia, and thus the same angular momentum, then applying torque further from the center (as in the case of a larger diameter, but thinner/lighter rotor) would result in quicker deceleration, or less "work" to decelerate the same amount as a torque applied closer to center. That example is for braking applications. When accelerating, the torque is always applied at the center of rotation through the hub and so the disk with the lower moment of inertia will always accelerate faster.
Old 03-11-2015, 01:11 PM
  #12  

 
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 2,630
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sylvan
I would caution against making statements like this in general, since the answer usually is "it depends". We don't know the exact moment of inertia of this rotor vs. other kits. While the diameter is less, they are thicker and have more vanes than competing products. So without doing actual measurements or inside knowledge of the CAD files we are just guessing at moment of inertia. Having said that, for two disks of identical moment of inertia, and thus the same angular momentum, then applying torque further from the center (as in the case of a larger diameter, but thinner/lighter rotor) would result in quicker deceleration, or less "work" to decelerate the same amount as a torque applied closer to center. That example is for braking applications. When accelerating, the torque is always applied at the center of rotation through the hub and so the disk with the lower moment of inertia will always accelerate faster.
True, thanks Sylvan. Good points about the differences in torque application between acceleration from the hub and deceleration caused by brake pads.

I was definitely over-generalizing in my earlier post in terms of knowing the relative moment of inertia between two rotors just based on diameter. While a smaller diameter rotor would have lower inertia if all else was equal, if it was enough thicker or had enough extra internal vanes, it might actually carry more inertia than a larger but less "dense" design.
Old 03-11-2015, 03:15 PM
  #13  

 
Sylvan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Brakes are complex systems, and it's necessary to generalize when talking about them. I In fact did so myself just talking about the disk brake in isolation, when really the entire wheel/tire/hub/disk must be taken into account as the entire rotating assembly in order to be thorough. I read a good book about disk brake systems in college, I wish I still had it to refer to.
Old 04-22-2015, 10:51 AM
  #14  
Sponsor

 
Urge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 2,456
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

We appreciate your business..
__________________


Old 04-22-2015, 05:26 PM
  #15  
Registered User

 
99SH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rhouck
Originally Posted by will010100' timestamp='1425969548' post='23533903
Drawbacks: A minor drawback is that the pistons are harder to compress when you need to change pads. There is no fancy tool to push them in like with the OEM, but this is probably the case with any opposing-piston system.
Remove one old pad. Flip it 90 degrees and stick back in center. The width of the backing plate will hit both pistons. Then just apply pressure to the end sticking out and it will retract both pistons.

99SH (user on here) bought an actual tool to do it which is pretty slick, but iirc it was $$$.
For those interested in the tool:

http://www.girodisc.com/Caliper-pist...er_p_5970.html
Old 04-22-2015, 06:20 PM
  #16  

 
Bullwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,550
Received 559 Likes on 391 Posts
Default

I found this pad separator to be very useful for aftermarket brake systems. quite a bit cheaper than the above...

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00...r_notf_fhv_prd

Old 08-02-2015, 09:28 AM
  #17  
Sponsor

 
Urge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: TX
Posts: 2,456
Received 41 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

Bumping a good BBK Review..

Great reviews for the common novice racer.
__________________


Old 08-03-2015, 05:28 PM
  #18  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thomsbrain
Originally Posted by Sylvan' timestamp='1426107553' post='23536345
I would caution against making statements like this in general, since the answer usually is "it depends". We don't know the exact moment of inertia of this rotor vs. other kits. While the diameter is less, they are thicker and have more vanes than competing products. So without doing actual measurements or inside knowledge of the CAD files we are just guessing at moment of inertia. Having said that, for two disks of identical moment of inertia, and thus the same angular momentum, then applying torque further from the center (as in the case of a larger diameter, but thinner/lighter rotor) would result in quicker deceleration, or less "work" to decelerate the same amount as a torque applied closer to center. That example is for braking applications. When accelerating, the torque is always applied at the center of rotation through the hub and so the disk with the lower moment of inertia will always accelerate faster.
True, thanks Sylvan. Good points about the differences in torque application between acceleration from the hub and deceleration caused by brake pads.

I was definitely over-generalizing in my earlier post in terms of knowing the relative moment of inertia between two rotors just based on diameter. While a smaller diameter rotor would have lower inertia if all else was equal, if it was enough thicker or had enough extra internal vanes, it might actually carry more inertia than a larger but less "dense" design.

Do the rules let you run a brake proportioning valve?

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samson123
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
4
01-29-2018 06:08 AM
Mijae007
S2000 Brakes and Suspension
1
11-29-2017 08:14 AM
always-Learning
Inland Empire S2000 Owners
8
07-17-2008 11:15 PM
HydroStud32
S2000 Talk
42
03-07-2006 06:56 PM
rukawa88
S2000 Talk
0
09-20-2002 01:39 PM



Quick Reply: New review of AP Racing BBK from Urge Designs



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:59 PM.