S2000 Racing and Competition The S2000 on the track and Solo circuit. Some of the fastest S2000 drivers in the world call this forum home.

Swaybar stiffness. Such thing as too stiff?

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-25-2019, 07:59 AM
  #11  

 
Bullwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,551
Received 560 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

I'm surprised no one has mentioned it yet, but another specific with a swaybar that is too stiff is that it decreases the "independence" of your suspension. Essentially, you're tying the left and right sides together. In that case, I would say that stiffer springs, in general, are preferable over a stiffer sway bar - rule set permitting and shock dampening correctly matched.
The following users liked this post:
kt411gcn (03-25-2019)
Old 03-25-2019, 08:54 AM
  #12  

 
circuitclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 988
Received 26 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

IMO, without proper data, it's all down to driver's preference
The following users liked this post:
kt411gcn (03-25-2019)
Old 03-25-2019, 09:00 AM
  #13  

 
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 2,630
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Assuming equal tire contact patches, spring rates and no bumpstop contact, stiffer sways will reduce grip, because they increase weight transfer and reduce suspension independence. In particular for the S2000, stiff rear bars can aggravate rear-wheel lift, which on the stock differential means a loss of power to the ground. However, suspension geometry and compression curves can be such that reducing roll with stiffer bars improves the contact patch shape enough to still be a net benefit. You'll mostly see that effect on softly-sprung cars (hence why OEMs use them in the first place). Bullwings is right that for road-course tracks, folks (especially those on sticky tires or with aero) have gravitated towards springs that are so stiff that the need for sway bars to provide additional roll stiffness to control the contact patch is greatly reduced. In those cases, sway bars are used more to make small "trim" adjustments to handling balance rather than to control roll. You see the crazy-stiff sway bars in autocross (where transitional response is prized over steady-state grip) and in competition classes that restrict other modifications.
The following users liked this post:
kt411gcn (03-25-2019)
Old 03-25-2019, 03:16 PM
  #14  

 
DavidNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,959
Received 51 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thomsbrain
Assuming equal tire contact patches, spring rates and no bumpstop contact, stiffer sways will reduce grip, because they increase weight transfer and reduce suspension independence. In particular for the S2000, stiff rear bars can aggravate rear-wheel lift, which on the stock differential means a loss of power to the ground. However, suspension geometry and compression curves can be such that reducing roll with stiffer bars improves the contact patch shape enough to still be a net benefit. You'll mostly see that effect on softly-sprung cars (hence why OEMs use them in the first place). Bullwings is right that for road-course tracks, folks (especially those on sticky tires or with aero) have gravitated towards springs that are so stiff that the need for sway bars to provide additional roll stiffness to control the contact patch is greatly reduced. In those cases, sway bars are used more to make small "trim" adjustments to handling balance rather than to control roll. You see the crazy-stiff sway bars in autocross (where transitional response is prized over steady-state grip) and in competition classes that restrict other modifications.
It's more complex. For many cars, less roll keeps the tire at a more favorable angle. While not a Street solo II issue, for many cars lowering adversely affects the suspension geometry, where running stiffer, especially in roll, is beneficial.
The following users liked this post:
kt411gcn (03-25-2019)
Old 03-25-2019, 04:34 PM
  #15  

 
noodels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Norfolk UK
Posts: 5,320
Received 345 Likes on 322 Posts
Default

One size does not fit all applications, in other words..
The following users liked this post:
kt411gcn (03-25-2019)
Old 03-25-2019, 08:31 PM
  #16  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Your not going to generate enough grip with a 245 extreme summer compound to run that stiff. Your arguably already pushing the limit with your current total spring rate (sways and springs combined) to leverage the tires optimally. Its a balance between handling character and allowing the tires work rather then being over worked. A really stiff S2k is satisfying to run on the street, its precise and responsive, however you get that same set up on the track pushing triple digit speeds and soon realize that sharpness has turned into a ultra finite edge of grip to no grip and its very exhausting to manage lap after lap. Finding a good balance to compliance and firmness to keep the body roll and wallowing in check for consistent management should be the goal. You want the suspension to work/move to maintain grip.

I'm running a bit more total grip then you are with 255/315 stagger on xtrm summer tires, I find for myself the stock 00-01 front sway and stock ap2 rear sways with 14kg springs f/r feels balanced, controlled and manageable on the big course wile offering good satisfying handling response on the street. Since moving to a widebody this year however, increasing track width significantly, im since experimenting with sways again, currently running a slightly stiffer 02-03 sway in rear. Keep in mind also I have the car set up without running a rear wing.

Last edited by s2000Junky; 03-25-2019 at 08:36 PM.
The following 2 users liked this post by s2000Junky:
freq (03-26-2019), kt411gcn (03-25-2019)
Old 03-26-2019, 06:59 AM
  #17  

 
circuitclub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 988
Received 26 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

I guess I'll chime in too: I've been tracking my car/other cars for 10 years now. Driven Tein, Ohlins, Buddy clubs, Konis, Penskes, and other super JDM bling; have used numerous combinations of swaybars: OEMs, removed rear, miata rear, gendron, karcepts etc. Lastly, most of my buddys and I stick to use 200TW tires, just list the last 10 years of tires and I've been lucky enough to try most of them.

Everyone here brings up very good points - you can see from the various responses concluding "it depends". Unfortunately, I also dont have a silver bullet for the ultimate setup either. It depends on your track: surface, layout, speed; also on your driving style and lastly, if you also plan to autox or run events where your mods will be counted for points. However to answer your question, there is such thing as "too stiff" depending on above variables. However, there are theoretical extremes: your local track/autox is very flat with minimal undulation and very sticky surface - you can essentially run "unsprung" setup with massive aero if you desire - you've just got to try it out and see for yourself
The following users liked this post:
kt411gcn (03-26-2019)
Old 03-26-2019, 08:53 AM
  #18  

 
thomsbrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Windsor, CA
Posts: 2,630
Received 39 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
It's more complex. For many cars, less roll keeps the tire at a more favorable angle. While not a Street solo II issue, for many cars lowering adversely affects the suspension geometry, where running stiffer, especially in roll, is beneficial.
Yup, like I said, for some cars, reducing roll can impact the contact patch enough to outweigh the negative impacts of the bars. We are saying the same thing in different words.
Old 03-26-2019, 10:05 AM
  #19  

 
JamesD89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 734
Received 59 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kt411gcn


You are mistaken. At my local track I have not seen a faster lap time by an na s2000 on street tires (been at least 50 times), and cars in general that are posting faster times are usually race cars or really fast production cars.

Setup has been great for me. It is borderline oversteer at mid/low speeds. It is one turn on the ohlins adjustment knob away from being neutral-handling.
What's the local track to San Diego? Autoclub? Chuckwalla? Buttonwillow? There are a ton of very quick SoCal NA S2000s.
Old 03-27-2019, 04:00 PM
  #20  
Registered User

 
BoboTheMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 105
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DavidNJ
It's more complex. For many cars, less roll keeps the tire at a more favorable angle. While not a Street solo II issue, for many cars lowering adversely affects the suspension geometry, where running stiffer, especially in roll, is beneficial.
Macpherson setups it makes a huge difference to lower body roll as the tire camber is affected significantly. Luckily our cars are double wishbone, which still has its issues, but maintains its camber better in cornering.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Maxcat
S2000 Racing and Competition
16
07-15-2018 06:09 PM
Shift9303
Wheels and Tires
18
05-30-2017 10:01 AM
Chugs
S2000 Racing and Competition
15
09-12-2011 08:58 AM
ukfinance2002
S2000 Racing and Competition
29
12-16-2005 08:02 PM
Mikey
S2000 Under The Hood
38
04-28-2001 07:57 PM



Quick Reply: Swaybar stiffness. Such thing as too stiff?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:25 AM.