S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

How to magazines get these 0-60 times?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-11-2008, 12:56 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
plutonium239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sold :(
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default How to magazines get these 0-60 times?

In the most recent mention of the S in a magazine, they were able to get to 60 in 5.3 seconds. This makes me wonder 2 things. Whenever I try to rip off a few gears, the CDV just slip the hell out of the clutch. I seriously doubt the mag people are doing a CDV mod. So is the S really that quick WITH the CDV valve and would it somewhat quicker, maybe 5.1 seconds without the CDV??
Old 07-11-2008, 04:46 PM
  #2  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
plutonium239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sold :(
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nobody?
Old 07-11-2008, 06:20 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Bricksnite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Antelope Valley
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No idea haha. They might just look up specs online.. ? Was it the comparison of the fast and frugal cars article?
Old 07-11-2008, 06:33 PM
  #4  
Registered User

 
shamoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The CDV really doesn't slow the car down. Not to flame, but if one were to drive it properly, it should be just as fast as the same car without CDV. Every car is a little different, you may just have to adjust your shifting/pedal work when you have the CDV, as opposed to not having it.

It's just different....not slower.
Old 07-11-2008, 06:53 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
SpudRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They just make em up.
Old 07-11-2008, 11:36 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
plutonium239's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sold :(
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bricksnite,Jul 11 2008, 06:20 PM
No idea haha. They might just look up specs online.. ? Was it the comparison of the fast and frugal cars article?
It was. 5.3 seconds is pretty good.
Old 07-12-2008, 02:54 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Ks320's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I sometimes wonder too

CDV should have a small impact, since the clutch doesn't engage fully while the clutch fluid's getting slowed down by the CDV. Thus power isn't fully transfered to the wheels for that split second.

Secondly, the AP2's second gear is a hairline shy of 60mph, and certainly is about 4km/h off of 100km/h. With that said, the car would require another shift, which should yield worse times.

But I dunno ... maybe those guys are THAT good

Or maybe the AP2 is just faster!!! Muhahahahha
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mighty4g63
S2000 Under The Hood
5
05-11-2008 12:22 PM
zyr
California - Southern California S2000 Owners
25
02-12-2007 09:21 AM
wingnutLP
UK & Ireland S2000 Community
17
08-09-2006 11:11 AM
WRS2K
Pacific Northwest S2000 Owners
4
08-25-2003 10:43 AM



Quick Reply: How to magazines get these 0-60 times?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 AM.