S2000 Talk Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it.

Problem Downshifting

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #41  
tabach0y273's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Chantilly
Default

Originally Posted by FO2K,Apr 23 2005, 06:54 PM
I quoted you because I think you are incorrect in stating the synchros match the engine speed to the output shaft. Synchros match the drive shaft to the mainshaft and clutch plate. It is then neccesary to speed up or slow down the engine with the throttle before engaging the clutch.

Maybe a minor point, but I think it might help for people to understand the process.
I noticed you edited your post to quote the correct reply

Your clarification was the one I was looking for too! I couldnt explain it as well as you just did. Its definitely a point that should be in the open.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #42  
Intrepid175's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Texas City
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,Apr 24 2005, 07:30 AM
First of all, "Woodwork" has advised against skip shifting, so I won't be saying it's OK to do it.
Actually, I thought the skip shifting only applied to upshifts. I never considered that it applied to downshifts. (?)

I often do 6-4, 5-3, or even 6-3 downshifts depending on the circumstances and have had no issues or protests from my transmission that I can detect. I always "rev match" when doing this and have "double clutched" too but I'm not as proficient at that as I'd like to be.

Just wondering!

Drive Safe,
Steve R.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 06:03 PM
  #43  
jyeung528's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,595
Likes: 54
From: Temple City
Default

^
exactly my thoughts when I read that.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #44  
SoDakS2K's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,877
Likes: 1
From: Omaha,NE
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,Apr 23 2005, 07:22 PM
You can rev-match without double clutching. You can double clutch without rev-matching and you can rev-match AND double clutch. Oh and this has NOTHING to do with "heel/toe". This is yet another variable which may or may not be combined with everything else that I've listed.

Rev-matching is just bringing the engine rpm up or down to match the speed of the rear wheels when the next gear (up or down) is selected.
Double clutching is moving the shifter to NEUTRAL, then letting the clutch out so that the engine can control the speed of the transmission. Whether you wish to spin the tranny up or down will depend upon what you intend to do with the car at the time. Putting the tranny into neutral and leaving the clutch on the floor accomplishes nothing. This basically isolates all 3 components of the drivetrain from each other -- the engine, the tranny and the rear wheels. The engine will turn based on how much gas you give it. This will be independent of the tranny, which will spin itself down from the fluid viscosity within. BOTH of these will be independent of the rear wheels, which will be governed by the road speed. ALL 3 will do their own thing as long as you have the clutch on the floor. (The engine is NOT connected to the tranny which is NOT connected to the rear wheels.)
"Heel/toe" is using one foot to operate both the brake and gas pedal at the same time so you can maximize braking AND shift at the same time. This is generally done when going into a corner HOT and there is need to scrub off speed, yet prepare the tranny (putting it into a lower gear) so you can power out of the corner.

First gear on most manuals is hard to engage when on a roll and decelerating. This is because of the "blocker ring" that is built into most manuals. Because 1st gear's ratio is so far from the rest of the gears, manufacturers want to make it difficult to engage first if the road speed is too fast. However, the blocker ring can be defeated by double clutching and rev-matching should you have the need or the desire to continue driving and accelerate from whatever you were slowing down for. For those of you who find it easy to downshift into 1st gear at a high speed without double clutching and rev-matching, I contend that you have used so much force to engage 1st that you have worn down the blocker ring. Not a big deal but just know that it was there originally for a reason.

So come guys, read "How Stuff Works" and stop confusing yourselves.
Thank goodness you showed up when you did!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #45  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Intrepid175,Apr 24 2005, 06:18 PM
Actually, I thought the skip shifting only applied to upshifts. I never considered that it applied to downshifts. (?)

I often do 6-4, 5-3, or even 6-3 downshifts depending on the circumstances and have had no issues or protests from my transmission that I can detect. I always "rev match" when doing this and have "double clutched" too but I'm not as proficient at that as I'd like to be.

Just wondering!

Drive Safe,
Steve R.
Most of us consciously blip the throttle (rev-match) when we downshift and because we do, it makes the transition smoother and we don't detect anything going on that could be detrimental. In the case skipping gears when upshifting, the average manual driver is not really cognisant that rev-matching is still important. On the most part, when people skip upshift, they tend to be a bit slower, allowing the engine speed (and the input side of the tranny) to slow down simply by letting off the gas during the process of selecting that next higher skipped gear. It's in those cases where a driver does a rapid skipped upshift and the engine and the tranny isn't allowed to slow down, that syncro wear is more possible and likely. Sometimes, this manifests itself in that telltale "clunk". It is this that engineers like Woodwork fear might happen and must profess to the "lowest common denominator". Transmission damage may not be obvious for thousands of miles or months later.
In both cases, we have something in common (but backwards of each other). In the case of skip downshifting, the output end of the tranny is moving much slower than the input side of tranny needs to be going after the new gear is selected. In the case of skip upshifting, the output end of the tranny is moving much faster than the input side of the tranny needs to be going after the new gear is selected. In either case, there is a marked difference in the speed of the input and output side of the tranny. This difference still has to be absorbed somehow and that's where the syncros come in. However, because we tend to instinctively rev match on a downshift (paricularly when double clutching is incorporated), syncro wear and tear is less in that scenario.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 07:42 PM
  #46  
boiler's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 1
From: Central USA
Default

Originally Posted by blue03s2k,Apr 23 2005, 03:48 PM
^ say what??? a double clutch is also known as rev matching........ there's no need to do it on an upshift.. (thats why we have syncros).... it's only needed when downshifting...... heal toe is relatively the same thing as double clutching/rev matching....
I wish that I could let you drive an older car with no synchros in the manual transmission. You would quickly learn the difference between double clutching and rev matching. You don't shift a non-synchro manual with out rev matching and you do not down shift one without double clutching AND rev matching.

I can shift my car into first at any reasonable speed with no problem at all. It is more difficult to do because you have to give the gas much more pedal travel to accomplish the rev match with any speed at all. If the revs aren't matched then the shift lever will not want to go into first gear easily.

If you do not feel comfortable downshifting into first gear, then don't do it.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #47  
AsianQing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,191
Likes: 0
From: Saratoga
Default

I have the same problem, but I notice its easier once the car warms up.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 06:41 AM
  #48  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,Apr 23 2005, 08:22 PM
First gear on most manuals is hard to engage when on a roll and decelerating. This is because of the "blocker ring" that is built into most manuals. Because 1st gear's ratio is so far from the rest of the gears, manufacturers want to make it difficult to engage first if the road speed is too fast. However, the blocker ring can be defeated by double clutching and rev-matching should you have the need or the desire to continue driving and accelerate from whatever you were slowing down for. For those of you who find it easy to downshift into 1st gear at a high speed without double clutching and rev-matching, I contend that you have used so much force to engage 1st that you have worn down the blocker ring. Not a big deal but just know that it was there originally for a reason.

So come guys, read "How Stuff Works" and stop confusing yourselves.
Dave, you still on this band wagon? I could have sworn after that little drive I gave you on the road just down from the hotel last year I had convinced you otherwise.

I disagree about me having worn down any type of blocker ring. My car as you witnessed shift into 1st from 2nd with a smooth heal/toe and rev matched shift just fine. I have never had to force the shift lever. It drops right into 1st about the same as it shift up to 2nd from 1st.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 06:55 AM
  #49  
xviper's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 37,305
Likes: 18
Default

Originally Posted by Triple-H,Apr 25 2005, 07:41 AM
I disagree about me having worn down any type of blocker ring. My car as you witnessed shift into 1st from 2nd with a smooth heal/toe and rev matched shift just fine. I have never had to force the shift lever. It drops right into 1st about the same as it shift up to 2nd from 1st.
I think your car is not the "norm" in this regard. Most S2000's will have a very evident blocker ring. Like I said at the time, your car's ability to shift easily into 1st at any road speed is quite baffling. You should go drive other S2000s, primarily ones that have never been track driven to see the difference. Blocker rings are a mechanical fact. I don't just dream this stuff up. It's also possible that you double clutch rev match so fast that it's hard to detect with the naked eye and ear. To test this theory out, try to engage 1st when decelerating from 2nd when you hit about 25 mph, but simply let off the gas and push the clutch in and try to get into 1st. If you still don't feel any resistance, I would propose that there is definately something abnormal about your transmission.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 07:20 AM
  #50  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

Originally Posted by xviper,Apr 25 2005, 09:55 AM
I think your car is not the "norm" in this regard. Most S2000's will have a very evident blocker ring. Like I said at the time, your car's ability to shift easily into 1st at any road speed is quite baffling. You should go drive other S2000s, primarily ones that have never been track driven to see the difference. Blocker rings are a mechanical fact. I don't just dream this stuff up. It's also possible that you double clutch rev match so fast that it's hard to detect with the naked eye and ear. To test this theory out, try to engage 1st when decelerating from 2nd when you hit about 25 mph, but simply let off the gas and push the clutch in and try to get into 1st. If you still don't feel any resistance, I would propose that there is definately something abnormal about your transmission.
Trip's Spa is abnormal...

Well I take it as a badge of honor that I'm able to baffle you. I'm sure blocker rings are fact any you are not just making that up, but you have to see from my point of view I have not experienced this so it is like you are talking to me in Swedish, I hear the words, but it is not sinking in.

I know exactly what will happen if I do as you describe - try to engage 1st when decelerating from 2nd when you hit about 25 mph, but simply let off the gas and push the clutch in and try to get into 1st. The shift lever feels like I'm pushing against the weight of Hoover Dam, talk about resistance...

I guess maybe in my case it is all about the fast double clutch rev match. Clearly I do not pussy foot around, track driving has taught me that, get that clutch in, get that gear selected, get that clutch out and get on the gas as fast as you can. Anyways, from my point of view, this car downshift into 1st very easy, and if memory serves me, I was doing it at speeds around 30+ mph.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:34 AM.