S2000 Under The Hood S2000 Technical and Mechanical discussions.

Rear Knuckle, Hub and Bearing Removal/Replacement

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 06:53 PM
  #11  
Hustn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
From: Conifer, CO
Default

Excellent writeup Nobody.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 08:18 PM
  #12  
Ludedude's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 15,835
Likes: 1
From: Vegas Baby, Vegas
Default

Originally Posted by Chazmo,Jul 25 2004, 07:46 PM
Not to take this awesome write-up off track, but I think 90 may be too high for our lugs. Something on the order of 75 ft-lb. Anyway, best wishes.
Spec is 80 lb//ft. I usually tighten them to between 80-90 myself.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #13  
Nobody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Default

79.6 ft/lbs is what the manual recommends, but if I can quote Xviper: "I feel 80 is not quite enough and although 100 may still be safe, I compromise at 90. There have been reports of the odd owner here where the lugnuts loosened at 80."

Also: https://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showt...;Lug+Nuts"

90 is pretty much standard at the track whether it's Volvos or Ferraris. I've no idea why the first one went. It's possible that it was overtorqued past 90....I'd rather I made a mistake than there be some defect with Honda Lugs.

And yes, they're always tightened in a star pattern.

I'll link this thread--thanks Xviper!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2004 | 10:56 PM
  #14  
Asura's Avatar
Registered User
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,754
Likes: 0
From: Anaheim, Orange County
Default

D,
As always, great write up
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 03:29 AM
  #15  
CoralDoc's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 3
From: Davie, FL
Default

Excellent write-up, well worth adding to the FAQ.

[QUOTE=Nobody,Jul 25 2004, 11:20 PM] I've no idea why the first one went.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 04:07 AM
  #16  
gsp's Avatar
gsp
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks,

Great Job!
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 07:02 AM
  #17  
Gernby's Avatar
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 15,526
Likes: 18
Default

After stripping / breaking lug nuts on my 1st autocross car, I started using anti-seeze on all my lugs. I haven't had a problem since, and my wheels come off quite often. I also make sure I never tighten OR loosen hot lug nuts.

I had to replace both of my rear hubs AND bearings between 35K and 40K miles. I've also replaced one hub and bearing set on another S2K. I think we just have underengineered bearings on the rear, which wind up scoring the hub when they go out.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 12:05 PM
  #18  
Nobody's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,776
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Default

The seize theory does explain the first one going--it looked ok, but when I went to remove it it just cracked right off (with very little pressure). Does Anti-Seize compound screw up measuring the torque the way oil does?

Any particular brand you guys would recommend?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 12:27 PM
  #19  
RACER's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,082
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Default

Originally Posted by CoralDoc,Jul 26 2004, 04:29 AM
One of the key lines of evidence for the "seizing hypothesis"is that many times the studs break upon lug nut REMOVAL.

My advice is to use a VERY LIGHT coating of anti-seize on lug nuts, brake caliper bolts, and any other fastener that is regularly removed and replaced on the car, especially those exposed to high heat.


I had this problem once 5 years ago on a 86 CRX. I tracked it twice, and when I tried removing one of the lug nuts, the lug broke. It was as if the nut was fused to the lug.

I now put a little bit of antiseize on the lugs. It does not take a whole lot, as the nut spins around the lug, the antiseize is distributed very well inside the threads, there will be a very thin layer. I am talking a very tiny dab. If you put to much, you will get a thick layer of antiseize in the grooves and then the excess will fling off from centrifigal force as the wheel spins.

Remember, just a very thin film will do. I torque my wheels to about 75-80 ft lbs for track or hard spirited driving. I check the torque frequently and never had a problem.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 01:06 PM
  #20  
mikegarrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 22,888
Likes: 3
From: Covington WA, USA
Default

The broken studs more likely point to under-torquing than over-torquing. Over-torquing will put stress into the bolt and stretch the threads. But under-torquing will allow the stud to flex, which will rapidly increase the number of fatigue cycles until they break.

Either problem requires replaceing the studs, but it is under-torquing that leads to the more dangerous failure.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 PM.