Anyone done their taxes, yet?
#11
I’m sorry, I don’t understand. It comes down to being informed. Those at work should check their withholdings. Just like you should, starting now so you can get in front of it if there’s an issue. The mass judge their tax returm based on the amount of the refund, which is completely wrong. I’m not saying the new tax legislation isn’t going to negatively impact some, but net nationwide it’s more taxpayer friendly. It actually negatively impacts me, but I understand why.
#12
I’m sorry, I don’t understand. It comes down to being informed. Those at work should check their withholdings. Just like you should, starting now so you can get in front of it if there’s an issue. The mass judge their tax returm based on the amount of the refund, which is completely wrong. I’m not saying the new tax legislation isn’t going to negatively impact some, but net nationwide it’s more taxpayer friendly. It actually negatively impacts me, but I understand why.
#13
I’m sorry, I don’t understand. It comes down to being informed. Those at work should check their withholdings. Just like you should, starting now so you can get in front of it if there’s an issue. The mass judge their tax returm based on the amount of the refund, which is completely wrong. I’m not saying the new tax legislation isn’t going to negatively impact some, but net nationwide it’s more taxpayer friendly. It actually negatively impacts me, but I understand why.
Take a look at the Schedule A (Itemized deductions). Where does the taxpayer take the deduction for accounting fees, brokerage fees, estate planning, fees for managed accounts and etc? For many of my clients those were significant deductions.
Whereas the QBI (Sec 199A) was an attempt to equalize the tax rate that small business pays with the benefits given to C Corporations, why were licensed professionals left in the "weeds" at certain income levels? If it's good for a C Corp, it should be good for all business.Those of us who make a living as licensed professionals in small business were left out.
All in all, I think more people are going to be dissatisfied with the results. It's still too early to generalize, but a lot of my clients are unhappy with the results.
Last edited by ralper; 03-04-2019 at 07:29 PM.
#14
I beg to differ. The withholding tables didn't get out of whack, they were purposely put out of whack to make the tax code look like it was benefiting Joe Taxpayer. I don't mean to get political and I don't want to see this thread exiled to the politics subform, but the tax tables, like so much of the tax code were politically driven. And, the news did report it, but nobody (except for a few of us CPAs) was listening.
Last edited by ralper; 03-04-2019 at 07:38 PM.
#15
I beg to differ. The withholding tables didn't get out of whack, they were purposely put out of whack to make the tax code look like it was benefiting Joe Taxpayer. I don't mean to get political and I don't want to see this thread exiled to the politics subform, but the tax tables, like so much of the tax code were politically driven. And, the news did report it, but nobody (except for a few of us CPAs) was listening.
I haven't gotten into business channels. A lot of news is from foreign sources. I like NHK, for Asian news. Deutsche Welle for European. I'm one of those Luddites who reads newspapers.
#18
I filed last week. While I'm used to a decent refund for both Federal and State, I only received a state one this year.
When I looked at my effective tax rate from 2017 to 2018, they were nearly identical. So, I guess I had more in each check and less back at the end?
When I looked at my effective tax rate from 2017 to 2018, they were nearly identical. So, I guess I had more in each check and less back at the end?
#20
No hurry, I've still got 41 days!