S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

They don't name them like they used to

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-09-2017, 04:01 PM
  #1  

Thread Starter
 
dlq04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Mish-she-gan
Posts: 41,200
Received 4,930 Likes on 2,990 Posts
Default They don't name them like they used to

Old 05-09-2017, 04:11 PM
  #2  

 
windhund116's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10,308
Received 1,424 Likes on 954 Posts
Default

And no one wears hats, these days. Doesn't his head size seem a bit out of proportion, to the car?
Old 05-10-2017, 03:51 AM
  #3  

 
boltonblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: bolton
Posts: 31,509
Received 3,500 Likes on 2,367 Posts
Default

obviously prior to photoshop.
Old 05-10-2017, 05:33 AM
  #4  

 
S2KRAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lewes, DE
Posts: 8,331
Likes: 0
Received 697 Likes on 473 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by windhund116
And no one wears hats, these days. Doesn't his head size seem a bit out of proportion, to the car?
Should have been in a Chrysler Imperial. Better proportions.
Old 05-10-2017, 09:57 AM
  #5  

 
JBamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Ohio
Posts: 179
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

at least they didn't bring it back as a compact... (poor Dart guys)
Old 05-11-2017, 06:34 AM
  #6  
Former Moderator

 
S1997's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston/Durango
Posts: 17,106
Received 610 Likes on 373 Posts
Default

I think 1959 was the wildest year of all the 50s for excessive size and style in American autos -- haha and in choice of monikers! :
Old 05-12-2017, 07:06 AM
  #7  

 
Zippy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: West Deptford NJ
Posts: 9,529
Received 133 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Back seats aren't big enough for a Chrysler Climax anymore.
Old 05-12-2017, 10:57 AM
  #8  

 
S2KRAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lewes, DE
Posts: 8,331
Likes: 0
Received 697 Likes on 473 Posts
Default

Try a VW.
Old 05-12-2017, 12:01 PM
  #9  
tof

 
tof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, MS
Posts: 14,947
Received 1,914 Likes on 1,306 Posts
Default

Dave, you're right. Now they mostly just number them.

Jim, I would amend to "58/59, to better include GM. 58 Chevy was kind of over-the-top in its way. Pontiac and Buick had some pretty wild offerings in 58 as well.
Old 05-12-2017, 12:55 PM
  #10  

 
The Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: La Crescenta, CA
Posts: 58,385
Received 1,180 Likes on 908 Posts
Default



Quick Reply: They don't name them like they used to



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.