S2000 Vintage Owners Knowledge, age and life experiences represent the members of the Vintage Owners

New Toy

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 04:12 AM
  #21  
Scooterboy's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 30,748
Likes: 4,760
From: Medina, OH
Default

Originally Posted by jukngene
Better be careful...Scooterboy has had his eye on one for a while. Keep the alarm armed!
He's safe. I bought a house instead!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2017 | 05:26 AM
  #22  
Legal Bill's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 34,131
Likes: 126
From: Canton, MA
Default

Originally Posted by MAGGIEMAE
Measurements 160HP 1.4Litre 4 banger with more torque than the S (184Lbs). It is related to the MX-5 but is a bit less hardcore.

Gene Plans are to bring her to SF.
It looks great! I love that profile view. BUT..."Ashley" for an Italian girl????
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 08:16 AM
  #23  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 81
From: Toronto
Default

Long story but point taken
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 09:51 AM
  #24  
kgf3076's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 29,805
Likes: 1,259
From: Here, naturally.
Default

Originally Posted by MAGGIEMAE
Measurements 160HP 1.4Litre 4 banger with more torque than the S (184Lbs). It is related to the MX-5 but is a bit less hardcore.

Gene Plans are to bring her to SF.
Not quite as torquey or as fast as the Miata, I looked at one a while ago (right after they were introduced) and Car & Driver comparison tested the two of them. I had 3 Spyders, was seriously tempted to make it four. Next silly, totally non-necessary toy purchase will be either a Genesis Coupe or a Subayota BRZ.

Last edited by kgf3076; Jan 6, 2017 at 09:53 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 11:16 AM
  #25  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 81
From: Toronto
Default

You sir are misinformed 148 vs 184 Lbs of torque as to speed very close but it iS slightly slower with a softer ride. That is one reason I went for it as we already have the hard core driver the S
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2017 | 04:12 PM
  #26  
kgf3076's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 29,805
Likes: 1,259
From: Here, naturally.
Default

Originally Posted by MAGGIEMAE
You sir are misinformed 148 vs 184 Lbs of torque as to speed very close but it iS slightly slower with a softer ride. That is one reason I went for it as we already have the hard core driver the S
Oops, you're right. It's been a while since I read that review. It is slower (heavier as well, if I remember correctly). Biggest problem is that it's a FIAT (says the person who had 2 124 Sedans, a couple of 124 Spyders and other miscellaneous FIAT products over a couple of years).
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2017 | 03:46 AM
  #27  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 81
From: Toronto
Default

About 100 lbs heavier and 5 inches longer and only marginally slower in all tests that I have seen. As to the Fiat comment to paraphrase " This is not your fathers Fiat" There has been a great improvement in quality and remember it is built in Hiroshima What could go wrong
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2017 | 12:50 PM
  #28  
MAGGIEMAE's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,884
Likes: 81
From: Toronto
Default

Proud new owner
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2017 | 01:04 PM
  #29  
jukngene's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Community Favorite
Top Answer: 1
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,032
Likes: 2,317
From: Delawhere???
Default

Reply
Old Jan 11, 2017 | 01:23 PM
  #30  
Emil St-Hilaire's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
Active Streak: 30 Days
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 22,670
Likes: 490
From: St-Redempteur,Qc.
Default

Originally Posted by jukngene
X2
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:47 PM.