Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2018/2019 Honda S2000

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 05:55 AM
  #31  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,949
Likes: 472
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT
A base Boxster is $56k and delivers 300 hp in a pretty straightforward manner. Why would I want a Honda for about the same price?

A loaded 160hp Miata is like $32k - there is the same giant gap between this and the Porsche that has always existed.

The original S2000 was great because it was an elegant solution to a roadster and beat cars like the Boxster at its own game while doing it for thousands less dollars.

If I was going to bring a convertible sports car to market these days, I'd be looking for a solution that delivers Boxster performance for $40k.
Amen. That's the point I was trying to make. You said it better.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 07:41 AM
  #32  
zdave87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 82,468
Likes: 1,193
Default

Originally Posted by Saki GT
A base Boxster is $56k and delivers 300 hp in a pretty straightforward manner. Why would I want a Honda for about the same price?

A loaded 160hp Miata is like $32k - there is the same giant gap between this and the Porsche that has always existed.

The original S2000 was great because it was an elegant solution to a roadster and beat cars like the Boxster at its own game while doing it for thousands less dollars.

If I was going to bring a convertible sports car to market these days, I'd be looking for a solution that delivers Boxster performance for $40k.
Well-when the S2000 was new and priced at ~32k or so, there weren't that many options to drastically raise the price, unlike a Boxster at $56K, which A)is almost impossible to find a base model, and B) you can easily cross $20k in options.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 08:45 AM
  #33  
freq's Avatar
Community Organizer
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 20,983
Likes: 187
From: in my garage
Default



Last edited by freq; Feb 1, 2017 at 08:47 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2017 | 08:54 AM
  #34  
MrClean's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,207
Likes: 1
From: Powell, OH
Default The Next S2000

The next Honda S2000 could have an electric twin-charging system | Autoweek

Felt good to read the headline after all these years.

We'll see where things go, but the proposed timing would be good for a milestone moment return.

Speaking for myself, an S2000 return would inject the needed 'sport' back into the brand and get me to think about Honda again.

I say to Honda, go for it!
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 05:29 AM
  #35  
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 332
From: Montana
Default

Originally Posted by clutchcargo
I would like to explore why the $50k price point is such an issue.

i paid about $35k for my S2000 in 99, going on 18 years ago.

why wouldn't a car that goes toe to to with a current Boxster be ok at $50k?

if they are going after the previous S2000 customers, they will likely want more content and their incomes have climbed since the early 2000s
S2000's only sold for MSRP when demand was high and the car first debuted. Otherwise you could buy AP1s new for under $30k. And $35k was well above MSRP in 1999 so I'm guessing you paid extra for the privilege.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 06:00 AM
  #36  
jeffbrig's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,537
Likes: 101
From: Fort Lauderdale
Default

Originally Posted by WolfpackS2k
S2000's only sold for MSRP when demand was high and the car first debuted. Otherwise you could buy AP1s new for under $30k. And $35k was well above MSRP in 1999 so I'm guessing you paid extra for the privilege.
This is probably regional, but I still paid MSRP in 2002 and had to wait a few weeks for the boat from Japan. None in stock at local dealerships been then.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 06:09 AM
  #37  
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 119
Default

In 2001, the dealership I worked for was selling them for $5k over MSRP and loaded up with options and we couldn't keep them on the lot.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 06:12 AM
  #38  
Mr.E.G.'s Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,281
Likes: 119
Default

I can't wait for a review comparing the new s2000 to the mid-engine Vette, factory turboed Subaru BRZ, the new RX-7, a Miata with more than 200 hp, the Elio, and a Volkwagen that doesn't have electrical problems, but I don't believe in fairy tales.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 06:21 AM
  #39  
clutchcargo's Avatar
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 895
Likes: 103
From: Chicago
Default

I paid mrsp

i added the body kit and a spare set of wheels

i think it cost me $600 to have the car shipped from the dealer near Buffalo to Boston

the dealers around Boston were all heavy into loading the cars with every available accessory and hitting you with a market adjustment on top of that
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2017 | 06:34 AM
  #40  
mosesbotbol's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 5,171
Likes: 121
From: Boston
Default

In '03, I paid MSRP or perhaps just under for one of three S2000's on the dealer's lot. The had an '02 used in the showroom, but was only a few 1000 less. Did not make sense going for the used one at the time.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:02 AM.