Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bridgestone S04 v. Michelin Pilot SS

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 06:02 PM
  #1  
rpg51's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 260
From: Vermont
Default Bridgestone S04 v. Michelin Pilot SS

I need some tires for a new set of 17 inch wheels for my ap1. I use S04 now and I am very happy with them. They are quite a bit cheaper - although not cheap by any standard.

Will I notice any performance difference in stock sizes between these two tires?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2017 | 07:53 PM
  #2  
s2ka's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 26
From: SoCal
Default

I had a set of Michelin PSS on the same Volks that you have. The problem is that the PSS 245 rears are a bit undersized and too narrow for a 17x9 wheel. Performance felt very average to me.

I've never tried S-04 but Bridgestone makes very good tires and the reviews are pretty good.

Another alternative is the Firesone Indy 500 that's a rebadged Bridgestone RE003, so it's a newly designed tire. Web reviews and comparisons to PSS sound good. Price is great and they offer 215 and 255 sizes.

I'm getting tired of my RE11A's throwing up rocks so I might try a set of the Firestones.

Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 05:50 AM
  #3  
S_DosMil's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,024
Likes: 4
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Here is what a PSS looks like on a 9" tire in a 245 size.


Not the best pictures but you get the idea. I think it puts just the right amount of stretch on them. Btw these tires have never let me down.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 07:54 AM
  #4  
s2ka's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 26
From: SoCal
Default

Michelin PSS 245/40/17 on a 17x9 +63 CE28. (Fronts are 215/45/17 on 17x7.5 +50)
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 08:07 AM
  #5  
s2ka's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 26
From: SoCal
Default

For reference, Falken Azenis in 255/40/17 on 17x9 +63 CE28. Fronts are 225/45/17 on 17x7.5 +50 CE28 and they rubbed the fenders a little. 215/45/17 don't rub.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 08:21 AM
  #6  
s2ka's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,037
Likes: 26
From: SoCal
Default

245/40/17 Bridgestone RE11 on 17x9 +63 CE28. Fronts are 215/45/17 on 17x7.5 +50, they run wide for a 215.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
Car Analogy's Avatar
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,759
Likes: 1,859
Default

There was a TireRack and Car and Driver tire test a few years back. MPSS came in first, S04 came in second. Both were highly rated.

The MPSS seems to offer more grip, while the S04 might have a bit more steering feel and feedback, slightly stiffer sidewall. The MPSS is probably also slightly more comfortable.

If you never ran out of grip and were happy with S04, I would just get them again. If you want to try something new, see for yourself, get the MPSS.

I just went through this same decision myself (except I had no previous experience with either). I chose the S04.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 11:43 AM
  #8  
Jah2000's Avatar
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 138
From: Cali
Default

Originally Posted by s2ka
I had a set of Michelin PSS on the same Volks that you have. The problem is that the PSS 245 rears are a bit undersized and too narrow for a 17x9 wheel. Performance felt very average to me.

I've never tried S-04 but Bridgestone makes very good tires and the reviews are pretty good.

Another alternative is the Firesone Indy 500 that's a rebadged Bridgestone RE003, so it's a newly designed tire. Web reviews and comparisons to PSS sound good. Price is great and they offer 215 and 255 sizes.

I'm getting tired of my RE11A's throwing up rocks so I might try a set of the Firestones.


I have these (on my Ap1 wheels) and I really like them.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 01:37 PM
  #9  
rpg51's Avatar
Thread Starter
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 3,296
Likes: 260
From: Vermont
Default

It is interesting that the reports are slightly more grip with the MPSS v. the S-04s because the tread with on the rear tires in the rear 245 size is a bit less for the MPSS. It does not sound like there is a heck of a lot of difference between these two tires.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2017 | 02:32 PM
  #10  
Carnut12's Avatar
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 254
Likes: 27
From: Southwick, MA
Default

Both great tires, I went Continental ExtremeContact Sport, it is getting really good reviews so far.

That said it had a $70 rebate at the time and it doesn't now. I was between these and the S-04's, it was a toss up. Based on my research the MPSS do not give a distinct advantage for the extra $$$. Plus I do not like the stretched look.

I do not think you can go wrong with any of them listed above including the Firehawk.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21 AM.