UK & Ireland S2000 Community Discussions related to the S2000, its ownership and enthusiasm for it in the UK and Ireland. Including FAQs, and technical questions.

0-62 times

Old 04-11-2005, 02:43 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 0-62 times

Now my car is run in I thought I'd try some unscientific times and was surprised at how quick it was:
first run - 5.74
second run - 5.88 (not such a good start)

This was with a passenger, warmed up car and tyres and stuff in the boot. It's 0-62 because both time the speedo clicked over from 59 to 62. Is this normal? good? I know it's rated at 6.2. I was surprised how quick it was. And no burning clutch smell either

Any thoughts?
Old 04-11-2005, 02:53 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Moggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: omnipresent
Posts: 7,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chilled,Apr 11 2005, 11:43 AM
first run - 5.74
second run - 5.88 (not such a good start)
how did you get such accuracy?

don't tell me your mates stopwatch and the speedo

59-62 = normal. Just like you wouldn't have seen all the numbers between 0 & 59
Old 04-11-2005, 02:56 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Amuse Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Do You have a HoNda?
Posts: 8,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's a good time as long as you were using some sort of speedo device connected to the pulse sensor (does that make sense)?
Old 04-11-2005, 02:58 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

As I mentioned above: "unscientific": mates stopwatch and watching the speedo. It's inaccurate, but was still surprised. Need to get myself down to santa pod or somewhere.
Old 04-11-2005, 03:01 AM
  #5  
GSi
Registered User
 
GSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I got 5.01 once, might have pressed the stopwatch button a bit early as I fluffed my gearchange though..
Old 04-11-2005, 03:26 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Colin Andrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

62 on the speedo is likely not 62mph really. GPS (as on camera site warning units) will give you a more accurate reading but will 'lag' real speed a bit (especially under full bore acceleration).

If you can do a "run what ya brung" 1/4 in less than 14s, and/or a terminal speed better than 100 tell us
Old 04-11-2005, 03:49 AM
  #7  
Registered User

 
Neil.H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Stuck in traffic
Posts: 9,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chilled,Apr 11 2005, 10:43 AM
Now my car is run in I thought I'd try some unscientific times and was surprised at how quick it was:
first run - 5.74
second run - 5.88 (not such a good start)

This was with a passenger, warmed up car and tyres and stuff in the boot. It's 0-62 because both time the speedo clicked over from 59 to 62. Is this normal? good? I know it's rated at 6.2. I was surprised how quick it was. And no burning clutch smell either

Any thoughts?
Your margin of error is quite large there, they could easily be a second out when you take your mates reaction time (start and stop) and the speedo over-reading.
Old 04-11-2005, 05:42 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chilled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: sideways with an OWL!
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Neil.H,Apr 11 2005, 03:49 AM
Your margin of error is quite large there, they could easily be a second out when you take your mates reaction time (start and stop) and the speedo over-reading.
I figure the human error isn't too big, it's going to be similar reactions "at both ends". But it is relying on the accuracy of the speedo. But I believe it's accurate at 41mph. There's a speed sign on the A64 coming into leeds that tells you your speed and it gave 41 whilst I was doing 41 and I was the only person on the road.

What I'd like to know is what people are getting out of a stock S2000 on 0-60? ie am I way off? I know all the inaccuracies that can creep in so I'd like to compare it, but the search engine doesn't like 0-60
Old 04-11-2005, 05:59 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
wadswoaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: London
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My hack method of doing timings is to video the speedo and later edit in Windows Movie Maker...... cut the start of the video off at the point where the speedo first moves from zero and end when it hits 62mph (100kph)....... the final video clip can be timed using the timer in Movie Maker which gives two decimal place "accuracy"

This is by no means scientific either but probably better than a mate and his spotwatch (tried that plenty of times as well ) as frame by frame editing of the start and stop times allows for speedo lag.

I haven't tried it on the S2000 yet but the last test (SLK55 AMG) gave a consistant 0-62 time of 4.9 seconds (exactly what Merc quote)
Old 04-11-2005, 06:05 AM
  #10  

 
Paper Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 14,318
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

5.21 seconds, although I accidentally started in 3rd and went straight to 4th

Quick Reply: 0-62 times



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:16 PM.