S2KI Honda S2000 Forums

S2KI Honda S2000 Forums (https://www.s2ki.com/forums/)
-   Wheels and Tires (https://www.s2ki.com/forums/wheels-tires-56/)
-   -   Need to find rpf1 setup. (https://www.s2ki.com/forums/wheels-tires-56/need-find-rpf1-setup-844059/)

Moddiction Feb 1, 2011 02:23 PM

Need to find rpf1 setup.
 
Will that require crazy work to fit? I would like a 9.5+45 for the rear but I can't find that offset available for the 9.5 rpf1.

Would ideally like 17x9+35 or 38 in the front and then 17x9.5+45 for the rear.

I want to run 225/45/17 for the front and 265/40/17 for the rear.

Or would a 17x9+35 or +45 for the rear be ok for a 265 tire?

I am lowered about 2". Rolled all around and have -2.5 rear camber and -1.5 in the front.

Does that sound doable? Do they have the offsets I couldn't find available anyone know?

Corey Maurer Feb 1, 2011 05:51 PM

I run 17X9.5+38 on all four corners.. I have more camber than that in the rear.. im rolled.. cut bumper and relocated tabs.. never has rubbed.. my fronts have from running too low but that is all

Moddiction Feb 1, 2011 05:56 PM

How low are you? How much camber are you running? And what size tires?

05APdeuce Feb 1, 2011 07:31 PM

That would be a really odd setup. I would run 17x9+45 in the front and 17x9.5+38 in the rear. Or even the 17x9.5+38 all 4 corners with a staggered tire setup.

Moddiction Feb 1, 2011 07:34 PM

^ I'm a noobie when it comes to wheel specs and all.


So would the 17x9+45 in the front with a 225/45 tire
and 17x9.5+38 with a 265 tire work? Or would I need to use a 255 only to fit?

05APdeuce Feb 1, 2011 07:48 PM

The 265 on the back will work but you will need to roll fenders and relocate bumper tabs. I had 17x9+45 all the way around with 255/40r17 and I still had to roll the rear fenders and relocate the bumper tabs. And I was also running -4 camber in the rear and -2.8 in the front.

Edit I seen you have fenders rolled already. If your bumper tab is relocated and the fenders are rolled all the way flat you should be fine, just run a bit more negative camber. If thats not an option for you I would stick with the 255

Moddiction Feb 1, 2011 07:52 PM

You really had to run that much negative camber with the 255 on the 17x9? Thought that was a pretty standard size people ran.
Are you slammed or anything?

05APdeuce Feb 1, 2011 07:55 PM

Ya, Im sitting Pretty low. Top of the tire is just barely tucked. Im pretty sure I could have ran less camber but I was preparing myself for the new rims I have now.

JDMQuip Feb 1, 2011 07:57 PM

I would get something different than the 17x9 +35. IIRC, the 17x9 +35 convex's?! and the Other size Concave's.

The 17x9.5 +38 is a pain in the butt fit with a 255/40/17 Either way you're going to need to roll fenders and relocate the tabs/lining.

Moddiction Feb 1, 2011 07:59 PM

I want the concave rpf1's I think.
So maybe just 17x9+45 all around.

Would love to be able to rock 225 front and 265 rear.
Definitely don't want to have more than -3 camber in the rear and -1.8 or so in the front.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:28 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands