Switching from side to side,moves the worn inside to the outside.
Of course,you have to take them off the wheels,and rebalance.
So,you end up with the worn part of the tire being now on the outside,and the not so worn part on the inside.

 

And,I read that PS4 were squirmy,due to soft sidewalls.

 

Either run less camber because you're not making use of the camber, or take corners harder so you make use of the camber you've aligned for.

Mounting, dismounting, and rebalancing tires that realistically have a lifespan of less than 30k miles is a waste.

You have either selected the wrong tire, the wrong alignment, or both for your given application.

 

No one rotates tires by removing and remounting. Not unless they have money and time to burn. Driving a S2000 on tires rated to last 30K miles gives up handling for the sake of a few dollars. My tires would age-out long before 30K miles anyway. I'm content to just get good performance tires every 3 or 4 years.

Asymmetric tires like my Bridgestone S-04s -- and their wheels -- can easily be swapped side to side but I've never seen the need. Tires develop a wear pattern based on their direction of rotation and doing this may increase wear by changing it. And, of course, directional tires have to be dismounted and remounted to swap from side to side.

-- Chuck

 

So,wich one has the stiffest sidewall.???
My bet is on BFG.

 

The Bridgestone RE-71Rs

 

I heard V12 were a hype. I recall everyone buying them then I hear it being an OK tire if that. I’d research a bit more.

 

And you get 6000 miles out of them.

 

Going for BFG.