Wheels and Tires Discussion about wheels and tires for the S2000.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

ASM Front Fender + Stock Rears Fitment Question

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-11-2019, 07:55 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
landapanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default ASM Front Fender + Stock Rears Fitment Question

No balls to cut my rears yet, so trying to keep the OEM body lines intact. Would I be able to fit a 17x9.5 +35 all around? Or would a +38 be more doable in the rear.

Probably with -3 camber in the rear to prevent rubbing. They're already rolled flat and tabs are relocated. I'm not too worried about the fronts since

They can go as low as 9.5" +25, but I want to meet somwhere in the middle so I don't have to cut my rears up.
Old 03-11-2019, 09:00 AM
  #2  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

No go on the 9.5 +35 in rear. +38 is pushing, having to run like -3.5 camber, which is not ideal. +45 fits aggressive but perfect.
Old 03-11-2019, 02:00 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
landapanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
No go on the 9.5 +35 in rear. +38 is pushing, having to run like -3.5 camber, which is not ideal. +45 fits aggressive but perfect.
I have 17x9.5+40 on a 245/40 and it fits perfect. Probably gonna run 255/40 soon(245 came with the wheels I’m not about stretching tires). That’s why I ask if 5mm is a big difference. Here’s how the rear sits now

Old 03-11-2019, 03:28 PM
  #4  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

^^^ Yeah 5mm is a big difference when your running these range of specs. Fitment gets pretty finite. Consider another 5mm reduced outer clearance when moving from a 245 to 255 IF you can count on manufacture consistency, which you cant. Anymore then -2 camber on the street is pretty pointless really and performance overall is decreased the more negative you go from there to accommodate wheel and tires that dont fit. I would not choose a wheel and tire spec that forces you to run -3 or more camber to not rub.

Last edited by s2000Junky; 03-11-2019 at 03:36 PM.
Old 03-12-2019, 11:13 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
landapanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by s2000Junky
^^^ Yeah 5mm is a big difference when your running these range of specs. Fitment gets pretty finite. Consider another 5mm reduced outer clearance when moving from a 245 to 255 IF you can count on manufacture consistency, which you cant. Anymore then -2 camber on the street is pretty pointless really and performance overall is decreased the more negative you go from there to accommodate wheel and tires that dont fit. I would not choose a wheel and tire spec that forces you to run -3 or more camber to not rub.
So a little fender massaging might be necessary when I run a 255. I'm thinking about getting SPC ball joints, but not gonna go above -3 camber. I want to stay functional for track/street purposes.

Plan B is going to a 18x9.5+45 and run a 2-5mm spacer on street and no spacer for track to prevent rubbing. But that would require extended studs and the whole 9 yards. Don't want to do it if I don't have to.
Old 03-12-2019, 11:44 AM
  #6  
Community Organizer

 
s2000Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 31,053
Received 551 Likes on 503 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by landapanda
So a little fender massaging might be necessary when I run a 255. I'm thinking about getting SPC ball joints, but not gonna go above -3 camber. I want to stay functional for track/street purposes.

Plan B is going to a 18x9.5+45 and run a 2-5mm spacer on street and no spacer for track to prevent rubbing. But that would require extended studs and the whole 9 yards. Don't want to do it if I don't have to.
3mm typically wont require to run extended studs to get the min 6.5 turns. The 5mm might or might not on those wheels. Running upper camber joints is a good way to dial in and out effective offset along with your camber, so never a bad idea to gain the extra flexibility. I've found a good 15mm at least this way from pulling the bottom camber cam in all the way to out all the way and utilizing the upper joint for the actual camber correction.

Last edited by s2000Junky; 03-12-2019 at 11:47 AM.
Old 03-18-2019, 12:21 PM
  #7  

 
Mugen_is_best's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 907
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

17x9 +45 is the flushest setup for the oem fenders with pull+tab relocate. I'm using this setup with -2.6 camber and J's RCA. I still rub under full compression.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Macphilly
Wheels and Tires
4
01-20-2017 08:06 AM
Hondakid1
Wheels and Tires
5
02-27-2014 07:22 PM
JayJones
Wheels and Tires
8
07-30-2013 08:50 PM
Jet3010
Wheels and Tires
12
03-28-2013 07:23 PM
f00dstamps
Wheels and Tires
4
06-16-2008 11:50 AM



Quick Reply: ASM Front Fender + Stock Rears Fitment Question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 PM.