I've been told my shots are "Honda advertisement quality"
#1
I've been told my shots are "Honda advertisement quality"
I'm a photography hobby enthusiast and I love taking photos on my free time. I took a few photography classes in college, including 35mm film. I just recently picked up a new full-frame camera and some of the first shots I took were of my beloved S.
I did a little photoshoot last weekend with a friend's and my S. He has the GPW and I have the NFR.
I only shoot RAW, and I use Lightroom to edit. I edit every single digital photograph I take; there's always room for enhancement.
By the way, if you're on flickr, follow me and I'll follow back!
My flickr
My shots from the weekend:
I did a little photoshoot last weekend with a friend's and my S. He has the GPW and I have the NFR.
I only shoot RAW, and I use Lightroom to edit. I edit every single digital photograph I take; there's always room for enhancement.
By the way, if you're on flickr, follow me and I'll follow back!
My flickr
My shots from the weekend:
#4
I'm not sure what you mean by "heat"? If I had to guess I would think you're talking about color temperature which I don't keep track of. On the camera I used manual mode, set my ISO, shutter, and aperture, and the rest I edited in Lightroom. For the shot with the blue faded to orange sky I used a graduated filter within Lightroom. One thing people don't quite understand is that when you're shooting with RAW, it's much better to shoot underexposed rather than overexposed. That way you can pull out a lot of detail in your shadows and your highlights won't overexposed, such as I did with my sky pictures.