S2000 Forced Induction S2000 Turbocharging and S2000 supercharging, for that extra kick.

Turbo vs. SC: 0-60 and 0-100 times?

Thread Tools
 
Old 11-25-2006, 05:06 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
helmet155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Turbo vs. SC: 0-60 and 0-100 times?

Any timeslips to show actual differences in the two setup times?

What about 0-60 and 0-100 mph times?

Thanks in advance,

Brett
Old 11-25-2006, 05:11 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Enthralled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 14,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would guess the T/C is faster of the two.
Old 11-25-2006, 07:14 PM
  #3  

 
batikan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They all depend on how you launch. When my SC was at 355whp, I put like half a car on a C55 up to 60 mph. Considering their 0-60 is around 4.9 ish, mine was around 4.7.

BTW, Turbo is not faster up to 60mph. Actually it will be slower but up to 100mph, Turbo will be faster
Old 11-25-2006, 08:51 PM
  #4  

 
GrandMasterKhan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 5,149
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

why would you say that? Turbo with loss of traction in the 0-60 sprint?
Old 11-25-2006, 09:37 PM
  #5  

 
batikan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When you launch, you will have to wait until the turbo builds up boost whereas with SC, it starts boosting right away. The power of the turbo reveals itself in 3rd gear because it will alread have built boost whereas SC will have to till reach full boost at 9K.

To give an example, when I raced my friends Turbo S2000, we started from 3000 rpm and he couldn't pass me on 2nd even though he has 60whp more than me. (He flew away in 3rd but still...)
Old 11-26-2006, 07:50 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
CourageOO7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Alright...I read two of your posts and couldn't keep quiet after this last one. You are wrong. Yes, there's a bit of turbo lag. HOWEVER, if you compare the boost supercharger guys (including myself) make to boost turbo guys make at, say 4000rpm, there's absolutely NO comparison. At 4000rpm most turbo guys make FULL boost (that could be 15lbs, 20lbs, 10lbs...depends on the setup). (Your friend must have a very large turbo setup with lotsa lag for you to beat him in any gear, at any rpm) Our superchargers (both centrifugal) are designed to build boost proportionately to rpm's so we don't build full boost until redline...hence our top end feels SOOOO much stronger than our low end. Turbo guys have FAR improved power in the low end because they make full boost so much sooner. If you look at the dyno/torque charts there's really no comparison. So, you're wrong: Assuming = Boost setups, turbo setups are faster no matter what the race. They always make more torque, too.

Now, if you're running a big boost supercharger setup you can close the gap. Sideways has proven this. The reason is that the more boost you run with a centrifugal SC, the more boost you get down low and this really helps increase power across the rpm range. But, you'll never make as much boost down low as the equivalent boost turbo setup...making the car slower in much of rpm range. In addition, turbo setups typically make more torque than the equivalent SC setup. Now, if you wanna talk about simplicity and reliability...hehe Suiting up!
Old 11-26-2006, 08:29 AM
  #7  

 
Sideways's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: South of the pier, Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 9,030
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=CourageOO7,Nov 26 2006, 08:50 AM]But, you'll never make as much boost down low as the equivalent boost turbo setup...making the car slower in much of rpm range.
Old 11-26-2006, 09:38 AM
  #8  

 
tbtak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Riverside, Ca.
Posts: 1,699
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Sideways,Nov 26 2006, 09:29 AM]
The boost down low will help in the rpm range down low.
Old 11-26-2006, 10:08 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
CourageOO7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 3,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

[QUOTE=Sideways,Nov 26 2006, 12:29 PM]
The boost down low will help in the rpm range down low.
Old 11-26-2006, 03:46 PM
  #10  

 
batikan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 2,282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can clearly see that I have a 11psi setup on my Vortech and my friend has a GT35 which creates more lag than other turbos. What I was trying to state is that from 0 to 60, SC will pull on Turbo but the Turbo will close the gap probably up to end of 2nd and then keep on pulling...


Quick Reply: Turbo vs. SC: 0-60 and 0-100 times?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:00 AM.