S2000 vs Solstice GXP?
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
From: Chandler, AZ
Originally Posted by iApex,May 22 2009, 04:42 PM
"It also depends on what you are going to be doing with the car. Because the s2000 is pretty much rung out. Without adding forced induction and supporting mods you aren't going to get much more out of the s2000. But the solstice on the other hand. Its pretty much a blank slate. Weight reduction and turbo hard pipes front mount intercooler upgraded injectors and boost controller. You will have more options to upgrade on the solstice. Plus with a simple wheel and tire change you will change a good amount of turn characteristics for the car. Initial turn in is mediocre at best on the solstice but thats completely due to tire selection. Like I said. The solstice has quite a bit more growing room. Plus the ecotec is an amazing engine."
The top down/top up procedure of the Solstice/Sky are enough to put it on the fail list for me tho....
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 29
From: Tucson
Originally Posted by s2kvince,May 23 2009, 11:35 AM
Lol...I replied then realized you linked me to a year old thread. I'll leave it there for them to bash.
BTW, a NA Soltice > S2000 for those of us who didn't know. Also, apparently we have no torque.
*info courtesy of the proud owners of a 95 Ford Ranger and 98 Camaro.
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 29
From: Tucson
BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA, check this out: http://www.carforums.net/showthread.php?t=66242
CTS has more votes than the A4, 335i, c350, G35, IS350, and TL combined!!!!!
CTS has more votes than the A4, 335i, c350, G35, IS350, and TL combined!!!!!
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,703
Likes: 0
From: Maricopa
Originally Posted by s2kvince,May 23 2009, 01:48 PM
Wow...seriously?
That's why everyone has been swapping the GM 3.0, 3.2 and 3.5 into there sandrails.
Oh wait those are all Honda engines....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post