Auto Racing Discussion F1, IRL, Champ Car, Nascar, WRC, BTCC, etc. Discuss recent races, results.

Bridgestone's unsafe, ONLY for Hamilton

Thread Tools
 
Old May 13, 2008 | 04:07 AM
  #11  
Triple-H's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 58,680
Likes: 2
From: West Henrietta UPSTATE NY
Default

We are talking about LH, of course this tire wear is no fault of his, he is the greatest thing ever, had to be the tires, could not possibly be him...
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 01:56 PM
  #12  
Borbor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Penforhire,May 12 2008, 01:05 PM
He seems smoother than most other drivers, at least from the in-cockpit views. His line was different on Top Gear's track but if you'll recall he crushed Jenson's time... on a wetter track! What is unique about his style?
You forget the 2nd last corner of that run.

Go look at it again, if that style doesn't heat up the rears quicker than everyone else, I don't know what does bar doing the "turn left in a right hander sport"

His line wasn't THAT much different, it's just different in T1 on TG
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 02:08 PM
  #13  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Triple-H,May 13 2008, 04:07 AM
We are talking about LH, of course this tire wear is no fault of his, he is the greatest thing ever, had to be the tires, could not possibly be him...
The insinuation that it is Hamilton's fault somehow is absurd. His job is to drive FAST, which he obviously does very well. The only "tire management" he should have to be responsible for is to ensure he doesn't run them out of grip before he pits for new ones, however many stops the strategy calls for.

The McLaren is clearly harder on the tires than the Ferrari.
With only one tire supplier, there's no reason not to make the tires way overbuilt to ensure that they structurally survive (not necessarily have any grip left, though) for a reasonable length of time (half-race MINIMUM).


Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:04 PM
  #14  
S_nisen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: 555sexydrive!!!
Default

Originally Posted by matrix,May 12 2008, 10:30 PM
Yes - any team could have stopped more often to change the tires...they chose not too.
How would of that been possible when they only have so many tires per racer? Michelin and the teams tried to come to a compromise, even vowing to not take any points from their finishing positions if the FIA would of compromised on the track with a makeshift chicane in the oval. They (FIA) didn't want to do that and the fans that attended were left with that bullshit of a race and Ferrari gaining 18pts over its rivals. Ultimately to me it still comes down to Toyboat as they were the only team that had any problems with the tires 2 years in a row. Michelin didn't have a real answer nor the ability to get new tires to the scene in time and because of such recommended to not race just in case something bad were to happen to one or more of the drivers, thanks Toyboat for your wonderful contributions to F1.
Reply
Old May 13, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #15  
matrix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 22,863
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

Originally Posted by S_nisen,May 13 2008, 09:04 PM
How would of that been possible when they only have so many tires per racer? Michelin and the teams tried to come to a compromise, even vowing to not take any points from their finishing positions if the FIA would of compromised on the track with a makeshift chicane in the oval. They (FIA) didn't want to do that and the fans that attended were left with that bullshit of a race and Ferrari gaining 18pts over its rivals. Ultimately to me it still comes down to Toyboat as they were the only team that had any problems with the tires 2 years in a row. Michelin didn't have a real answer nor the ability to get new tires to the scene in time and because of such recommended to not race just in case something bad were to happen to one or more of the drivers, thanks Toyboat for your wonderful contributions to F1.
How many tires do you think they needed? Surely not one per lap . They could have gone for a 3 or 4 pit strategy - they would have had enough tires.

How is building a temporary chicane fair to the other teams not having a tire problem? And like you said, not all Michelin teams had that problem.

The only reason they offered to give back the points was because it would have still taken points from Ferrari if they would have placed higher than Ferrari.

I do blame Michelin for this, but I also blame the decision not to race on the teams - they could have raced had they talked to Michelin about 3 or 4 pit stop strategies. If Michelin was totally to blame for not racing, they shouldn't have practiced or qualified because the warning should have stood then also.
Reply
Old May 14, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #16  
Flite's Avatar
Former Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,582
Likes: 0
From: middle of a corn field
Default

Originally Posted by timrocks311,May 13 2008, 06:50 AM
^that would be Bridgestone, not Michelin.
Haha, Wow... I guess shopping for Michelins while I'm posting about Bridgestones doesn't work for someone with ADD huh? Thanks
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
(S2K4ME)
Car Talk - Non S2000
30
Oct 23, 2009 09:59 AM
san2000
Car Talk - Non S2000
16
Sep 2, 2006 01:12 PM
WarrenW
Auto Racing Discussion
93
Jun 23, 2005 10:57 AM
Rogazilla
S2000 Talk
10
Jun 19, 2005 07:03 PM
Nabs 79
Southern Ontario S2000 Owners
31
Mar 22, 2004 03:59 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:48 PM.