Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

2010 Ford Taurus SHO

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:33 AM
  #11  
Traveldude's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Default

They plan on putting this engine in the Flex and MKS, for the record.

While $38k may seem high for a "Taurus" and that you have other alternatives out there like the Infiniti or Bimmer, the latter two are much smaller cars. In terms of interior space, the Taurus is a HUGE car, as seen below:

Passenger Volume (cu feet)
102 Taurus SHO
89 335
99 535
99 G35x

Luggage
20.1 Taurus
12.0 335
14.0 535
13.5 G35x

So, even though it is just a Taurus (although I think its interior in photos is as nice as any Bimmer), I think you would be hard pressed to find a car that could provide everything that it offers (full size, 350+hp, AWD) for less than that. And who knows, handling could be a revelation like previous SHOs.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:37 AM
  #12  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,735
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by Jimmies,Feb 11 2009, 09:13 AM
I wouldn't be so sure of that. The 1st gen SHO's were fantastic handling cars for the day.
Sure. But that was then, this is now. The old Taurus was fantastic in its day but the recent ones have been mediocre (at best) and horrible (at worst).

No one knows how this one drives or handles so I'm not holding my breath just yet.

It's also probably going to weigh 4000+ lbs, based on how large it is.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:38 AM
  #13  
sparrow's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 1
Default

gauge cluster and steering wheel look terrible...everything else is nice
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:44 AM
  #14  
CosmosMpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,485
Likes: 21
Default

Why, when you can get a 500+ hp V10 M5 used for 40K right now
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:48 AM
  #15  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,735
Likes: 247
Default

Probable engine overhaul in the near future? Exhorbitant parts costs? New car vs four year old car? Full warranty? 0% financing for ninety-three years? Fuel economy?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:49 AM
  #16  
Jimmies's Avatar
Registered User
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 641
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by sparrow,Feb 11 2009, 07:38 AM
Sure. But that was then, this is now. The old Taurus was fantastic in its day but the recent ones have been mediocre (at best) and horrible (at worst).

No one knows how this one drives or handles so I'm not holding my breath just yet.
Right. So since no one's sure, why not give the benefit of the doubt?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:50 AM
  #17  
thrillissues's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default

Cool specs, but that price puts it against some pretty badass sedans that already have good reputations. Also, what's with the bottom of the car being black all the way around? It gives the illusion that the car is higher off the ground than it already is.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:51 AM
  #18  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

I laugh at the thought of buying a used BMW anymore - they are getting to be like Ferraris with main costs - especially the Ms.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 06:57 AM
  #19  
CosmosMpower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,485
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Feb 11 2009, 09:48 AM
Probable engine overhaul in the near future? Exhorbitant parts costs? New car vs four year old car? Full warranty? 0% financing for ninety-three years? Fuel economy?
The V10 M5 has been out for 4 years and I haven't read about any grenaded engines (except maybe abuse). Parts cost are 50/50, there is a lot of aftermarket OEM replacement stuff and many online wholesale price parts dealers for BMW. If you can do the work yourself or find an independent it's managable.

Most the 06/07 M5's should still be within warranty anyway and have free scheduled maintenance (get rotors/wear items changed while still in this period). If you have decent credit you can get financed for 5-7%, not that big of a difference in a monthly payment.

Fuel economy is probably not going to be better than 15-17 mpg in that Taurus I bet and the extra 140 hp are worth it. Plus you get a ton of cool tech stuff and you won't be driving a Taurus.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2009 | 07:12 AM
  #20  
Spec_Ops2087's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 10,301
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by JonBoy,Feb 11 2009, 10:08 AM
That interior really does look sharp. I always wait to see it in person (ever notice how EVERY car interior looks at least decent in photos?) but they've really upped the ante with this car. The exterior is worlds better and that's a monster motor as well.

That said, I'd never pay $38K for a Taurus. If I was going AWD, I'd rather get a G37x that is going to absolutely murder it in handling, looks better, and probably will be about as quick anyways. Or, even better, a G37 Sport 6MT (yeah, RWD, but I don't need AWD in Texas) that will be quite engaging and again, probably about as fast.
Have you driven the new G37s? For the price, their interior is horrible; Cheap plastics, no real design, and terrible leather. The only thing they have going for them is their exhaust note and the exterior.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:10 AM.