3-yr update
i think there's psychology at play too. lets say both had a 350 mi range, diff between a 22mpg and a 16mpg fillup is 90$ over 65$ which has to be a mental blow no matter how thick your wallet is
Originally Posted by s.hasan546' timestamp='1325630084' post='21282783
4. when your spending $60k+ does mileage really matters as much? and whats the difference? 5 mpg? @ $4/gal a 5 mpg difference @ 12k miles is only a $800 difference. Not Huge IMHO when looking at these kind of cars.
it is largely psychology, but there is no magical point where suddenly you're buying a car and your brain shuts off and you don't care what it costs to drive, maintain, and take care of. Maybe it happens, but for me, it's not at $60k. Honestly if I was in the market for a 911TT or R8 V10 or something similar, I think I'd still be thinking about running costs (not just mileage)...if you're DD'ing it, running cost helps calculate the true cost of the car, which any buyer should be comfortable with.
found it in a lexus forum if anyone is interested:
Just for kicks...with a 6800 RPM redline, 255/35R19 rear tires, and a 2.94:1 final drive axle ratio, the theoretical redline-limited top speed in each gear is as follows:
1st - 4.60:1 - 38 mph
2nd - 2.72:1 - 65 mph
3rd - 1.86:1 - 96 mph
4th - 1.46:1 - 122 mph
5th - 1.23:1 - 145 mph
6th - 1.00:1 - 179 mph
7th - 0.82:1 - 218 mph
8th - 0.69:1 - 259 mph
rev - 2.18:1 - 82 mph
1st - 4.60:1 - 38 mph
2nd - 2.72:1 - 65 mph
3rd - 1.86:1 - 96 mph
4th - 1.46:1 - 122 mph
5th - 1.23:1 - 145 mph
6th - 1.00:1 - 179 mph
7th - 0.82:1 - 218 mph
8th - 0.69:1 - 259 mph
rev - 2.18:1 - 82 mph
very good review. my neighbors had one they let me drive fairly often and actually take the track twice as well lol. i thought the transmission was bar none the best non-manual i have ever driven. id love to have a low miles one if i could afford to maintain it!
Good write-up, I've had my 2008 IS-F for exactly a year now and agree with most of the points you made. I gave up a little speed coming from a heavily modded 2006 STI / 2004 S2000 combo, but really have been happy with the IS-F.
I've put around 12k miles and have gotten closer to 22-23 MPG in MO, but I have been down to 21 or so since I started doing more short trips (a result from working from home 2 days a week, so less highway miles), so overall I would say I am getting around the same mileage. It was a plus when comparing to a M3 / S4 for me, since to me if I can have around the same fun with the car, why waste the 1k/year extra on gas?
So far I have only had 2 oil changes as far as maintenance, mine were priced the same as you, it was a shock at first, but considering it's only needed every 5k it doesn't bother me that much.
I've put around 12k miles and have gotten closer to 22-23 MPG in MO, but I have been down to 21 or so since I started doing more short trips (a result from working from home 2 days a week, so less highway miles), so overall I would say I am getting around the same mileage. It was a plus when comparing to a M3 / S4 for me, since to me if I can have around the same fun with the car, why waste the 1k/year extra on gas?
So far I have only had 2 oil changes as far as maintenance, mine were priced the same as you, it was a shock at first, but considering it's only needed every 5k it doesn't bother me that much.


