Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

4 cylinder mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 05:54 AM
  #1  
AngryTurtle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281,963
Likes: 442
From: Charleston, SC. \>
Default 4 cylinder mustang?

http://mustangsdaily.com/blog/2012/1...10-horsepower/



The rumors of an EcoBoost four-cylinder coming to the 2015 Ford Mustang have been all but confirmed, but the technical specifications of the engine including displacement and horsepower and torque outputs are still up for debate. Earlier this year it was surmised that the engine could be the same turbocharged 2.3-liter four-cylinder slated to be in the next generation Ford Focus RS, which could produce anywhere from 250 to upwards of 320 horsepower. Of course, that leaves little room for a V6 option, and it’s possible that Ford might drop the six-cylinder for the Mustang all together.

According to one forum user over at AllFordMustangs.com, though, the rumor of a 300+ horsepower four-cylinder offering is correct. Member GT_STYLE, claiming to be have been part of a market research study for the next generation Mustang, states that an EcoBoost 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine was listed as an engine option, producing 310 horsepower and netting 34 MPG on the highway.

GT_STYLE also gave his impressions of the design, saying that “the body is very similar to the current body but the sides are formed/indented and the trunk length is smaller. The front was very very cool with a beehive grill. The Mustang logo was centered and about 3 inches from the grill and it had a chrome line/piece going from side to side on either side of the logo.

He continued by describing the headlights and taillights.They [the headlights] were little slants, not the traditional round Mustang lights or even close to the current HID style. They [the taillights] are actually louvered and projecting out. Kinda like the quarter window louvers. They are solid red. The traditional third break light on the trunk lid was gone. The third break light is now actually quite large and under the license plate.”

Of course, all of this information has to still be considered rumor, and it’s likely specifications and the design of the 2015 Mustang could still be tweaked. Either way, expect a four-cylinder option for the 2015 Mustang with power outputs and fuel mileage as good or better than the current Mustang V6.
I dont see a 4 cylinder as any more sacrilegious then the V6 model. And I would be hopeful for a turbo v6.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 06:07 AM
  #2  
Scot's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 17,288
Likes: 39
From: Nashville
Default

Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 06:07 AM
  #3  
WolfpackS2k's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 333
From: Montana
Default

I question the validity of that post based on this:

The traditional third break light on the trunk lid was gone. The third break light is now actually quite large and under the license plate.”
Unless the license plate is positioned super high (not realistic on a coupe) regulations prevent the 3rd brake light from being below the 2 traditional brake lights. Putting the 3rd brake light below the 2 traditional brake lights defeats the entire purpose of it in the first place

also, brake not break. FFS
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 06:12 AM
  #4  
fishfryer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,426
Likes: 0
Default

Formula 1 cars have had and will have 4 cyl. The number of holes in a block doesn't really matter to me, when it comes to engines all that matters is 60 foot times. The sound won't be right, nothing sounds worse than a 4 cylinder car except for a 1 cylinder scooter, but you have to sacrifice something to the tree huggers. I won't buy one a 4 cyl mustang, but that doesn't mean they are bad. I think it is a nice looking car, but I'd like to see more glass area, it looks too hard to see out of.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 06:49 AM
  #5  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,735
Likes: 247
Default

All I know is that the above rendering looks hot!
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 07:03 AM
  #6  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Looks like someone stole some design cues from the new Vanquish.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 07:04 AM
  #7  
nofearofdanger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,807
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne
Default

Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 07:46 AM
  #8  
Slithr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

Originally Posted by nofearofdanger
Looks like someone stole some design cues from the new Vanquish.
If you are going to swipe some design cues, there are worse places to go.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 08:02 AM
  #9  
Presto123's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 1
From: Miramar, FloriDUH
Default

Looks damn good. If the 4 banger puts out V6 horsepower and torque then I don't really see the case for blasphemy. Times are changing and naturally aspirated engines are a dying breed.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2012 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
Slithr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

Originally Posted by Presto123
Looks damn good. If the 4 banger puts out V6 horsepower and torque then I don't really see the case for blasphemy. Times are changing and naturally aspirated engines are a dying breed.
I guess there is a decent chance that the next option up might be a ~ 400 h.p. ecoboost v6.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 AM.