Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Almost perfect

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 01:00 AM
  #1  
YBS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Default Almost perfect

I was browsing around ebay and ran across possibly the best looking Corvette I've ever seen. I don't remember ever actually seeing this color in person on a second gen, it's stunning. Almost perfect, if only it was a split-window....I think I'd sell my soul to get a hold of the ~$50K for it.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 01:44 AM
  #2  
Officer_down's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 0
From: Bothell
Default

'63 Vette? Yep, that's a rare and beautiful machine!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 03:09 AM
  #3  
ellisnc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 805
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, OH
Default

The issue with cars like that is that they look awesome (at least I think so) but when you get into actually driving the car... to me that's when the attraction fades very quickly.

You can't possibly buy a car like that (old Boss Mustang for another example) and really expect to drive the car hard.

I was at Thunderhill last year and a guy had a very nice 1970 or so Mustang. Hoosier tires and he had converted the brakes to very modern parts. I thought it was cool he was actually using the car, but from the looks of it there were many modern parts on it. The sad thing is I'm sure it still wasn't all that nice to drive.

So I guess what I'm saying is that unless you get off on the fact that you have something old, (sometimes I like old things as long as the function is still there - watches for example) just let someone else maintain the cars and admire them when you get a chance...

Nice car though, I agree!
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:46 AM
  #4  
CG's Avatar
CG
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,029
Likes: 2
From: In the heart of the USSA!
Default

Originally Posted by ellisnc,Apr 24 2005, 05:09 AM
The issue with cars like that is that they look awesome (at least I think so) but when you get into actually driving the car... to me that's when the attraction fades very quickly.
I owned a 1964 Corvette that except for being red inside and out was very much like this one. It had the 327/300/4sp. Wonderbar radio and two tops. Sure there were some differences between the 63 and 64 but they drove the same. It didn't drive like a modern car but out of the well over 100 cars I've owned it stands out as my all time favorite. It's the one I really wish I'd never sold.

Somewhere I've got a picture of my car sitting next to a car that looks just like the one that's for sale, if I had a scanner I'd dig it up and post it.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #5  
YBS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ellisnc,Apr 24 2005, 03:09 AM
You can't possibly buy a car like that (old Boss Mustang for another example) and really expect to drive the car hard.
Of course not, if I were to find and purchase a comparable '63 split-window (for me the split-window is the only real reason for buying a '63, if I wanted a convertible I'd most likely look into later 2nd gen models, particularly 65-67) it would likely never see another 15,000 miles during the rest of it's entire life.


Originally Posted by ellisnc,Apr 24 2005, 03:09 AM
just let someone else maintain the cars and admire them when you get a chance...
That's part of the reason I'd like to get one of these, short of when something like a Super Chevy show is in the area, you don't get a chance. I think other than under the circumstances listed in the previous statement, I've seen a grand total of one '63-67 vette actually being driven down the road in the past year. I used to see them relatively frequently not all that long ago, but they seem to have become true 100% garage queens as of late. I'd be almost as guilty of this as anyone else as my statement about less than 15,000 miles in the paragraph above shows, but I would get it out occasionally on a very nice day....it would just be wrong not to IMO.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 01:55 PM
  #6  
reidconti's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Default

My father's got a 66 Vette sitting in the garage with over 160k miles, thing was absolutely bulletproof.

I assume that the hardtops did not have the split window, which is why that car does not have it?

My dad told me many years ago that when the 64's came out, lots of guys had their 63's cut up to get rid of the damn split window and replace it with the more modern full window... haha. Hoping I'm remembering that story right..
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 02:09 PM
  #7  
YBS1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by reidconti,Apr 24 2005, 01:55 PM
My father's got a 66 Vette sitting in the garage with over 160k miles, thing was absolutely bulletproof.

I assume that the hardtops did not have the split window, which is why that car does not have it?

My dad told me many years ago that when the 64's came out, lots of guys had their 63's cut up to get rid of the damn split window and replace it with the more modern full window... haha. Hoping I'm remembering that story right..
Yeah, the split-window appeared only in 1963 coupes.

I can't remember hearing stories of that before, I'd have to ask my dad if he has, but it certainly wouldn't suprise me. The stupid shit people will do to their cars...if only they had known then what we know now.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 03:00 PM
  #8  
aklucsarits's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,129
Likes: 0
From: Philly
Default

Wow, that's a nice looking Corvette! That color would look putrid on any other car, but on a Corvette, it looks classy. Very nice.

I don't think I've ever seen a hardtop on a 60s Corvette convertible. I wonder if it's original or a reproduction... That was an extremely rare option. If that hardtop is a factory original, that part alone is probably worth a couple thousand $$.

Andrew
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #9  
benny's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 940
Likes: 2
From: Toronto
Default

Reidconti, you are absolutely correct. Many 63 owners had the rear split window removed and a one piece glass put in. Part of the reason why an original split is worth the coin it is.
Someone else will correct me if I am wrong but....I also think later in the 63 year (or maybe in 64 you had the choice) GM gave you the option of whether or not you wanted the vehicle with the split.
By the way, that colour in those years was very desirable as well and I think quite a few were sold. IMHO one of the nicest colours available ever on that particular body style.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #10  
CG's Avatar
CG
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,029
Likes: 2
From: In the heart of the USSA!
Default

Originally Posted by aklucsarits,Apr 24 2005, 05:00 PM
I don't think I've ever seen a hardtop on a 60s Corvette convertible. I wonder if it's original or a reproduction... That was an extremely rare option. If that hardtop is a factory original, that part alone is probably worth a couple thousand $$.

Andrew
Andrew, the hardtop that looked like that one was an option on the 63 -- 67 drop top Vettes. My 64 was red with a white soft top and red hard top. The original knockoff wheels on this car are even more rare than the hardtop. Most of the Vette's you see with wheels that look like these aren't true knockoffs. My car had one option that this one is missing, that being back up lights. You had to manually turn them on and off and they were great to make people on your tail back off.

I've driven 63 split window Vette's and there's a very good reason Chevy axed it after 63. The view out the back was awful. It sure looked and still looks cool though. Like YBS1 if I were to buy another C2 Corvette I would lean towards the 65 - 67 conv. The 63's and 64's were very much alike except for mainly trim items. The split window was the biggest change on the coupe's and the 64's were missing the hood "vents." The seats were a little different as were the guages and the glove box door, but little else changed. After 64 the drum brakes were gone and the cars stopped much better. Also while there was nothing wrong with the 327 engine more choices were added later like the monster 427.

BTW, I saw a red 65 conv. on the highway yesterday and it sure looked sweet.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iamxpl
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
33
May 28, 2014 01:50 PM
Legal Bill
New England S2000 Owners
15
Mar 26, 2007 03:28 PM
GT-Spec S2k
The S2000 Gallery
21
Jun 9, 2006 05:03 AM
tcho82
Upper Mid-West S2000 Owners
20
Nov 10, 2005 06:52 PM
TurboVtk
S2000 Talk
14
Mar 17, 2001 02:20 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:10 AM.