Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

The Biggest Loser: Audi A5

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #1  
exb00st's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default The Biggest Loser: Audi A5

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/car/10...prototype_drive

Taking weight out of a modern car can be tricky: Crash regulations have necessitated heavier structures, emissions laws have forced additional complexity into vehicles, and amenities have added dozens of electronic control units and untold miles of cable. Many automakers, however, are now experimenting with shedding pounds as a means to maintain performance despite the current trend toward engine downsizing. To illustrate the potential of this approach, Audi engineers set out to create an A5 2.0T that weighs 500 pounds less than a 3400-pound Euro-spec A5 V-6 model (U.S. versions weigh roughly 200 to 300 pounds more due to options and higher levels of standard equipment). The result is an A5 coupe that, according to Audi, tips the scales at a svelte 2888 pounds despite retaining the 2.0-liter’s heavy iron block.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
airgate's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 25,439
Likes: 2
From: St. Louis, MO
Default

Nice. The A5 is my fave in the Audi lineup...you never see 'em here in Eastern NC but they were a dime a dozen in Charlotte...
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #3  
rjohnstonstl's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis
Default

Originally Posted by exb00st,Jan 25 2010, 02:47 PM
tips the scales at a svelte 2888 pounds despite retaining the 2.0-liter’s heavy iron block
Very impressive, the A5 and S5 are such beautiful cars. Recently I've been seeing more and more of them around here (St. Louis).

I'd love to have an S5 weighing around 3000 pounds, but I have a feeling that losing the weight would require lots of exotic materials and would be prohibitively expensive.
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 07:28 PM
  #4  
13darkknight's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Default

is this 4 sale?
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #5  
Jacques79's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,933
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Default

How the hell do you shed 500 pounds off a luxury GT car.

LOL
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #6  
exb00st's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Jacques79,Jan 25 2010, 09:33 PM
How the hell do you shed 500 pounds off a luxury GT car.

LOL
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 06:04 AM
  #7  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Awesome idea and the nice thing is, some of it is actually production-feasible with killing cost.

Honda's new CEO told the Civic design team to go back to the drawing board because he wanted a lighter, more efficient car with similar packaging to the current car. They have less than two years to make it happen.

Engines are getting more and more efficient. It's high time that design engineers cut the weight out of the cars instead of compensating with power.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 06:10 AM
  #8  
Onehots2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

I wonder how well the ride quality is now? I've never experienced a light luxury car.
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 06:25 AM
  #9  
PsychoBen's Avatar
Registered User
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 7,692
Likes: 8
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

That would be a dream car
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010 | 06:30 AM
  #10  
deathsled's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,189
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

wow C&D sure is a little behind, I read about this back in September lol
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 PM.