Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

BMW's attempt at copying Fit?

Thread Tools
 
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 02:15 PM
  #21  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,735
Likes: 247
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Originally Posted by JonBoy' timestamp='1343850886' post='21905780
But if you add RWD, you give up lightweight, remember?
You can build a reasonably lightweight rwd car. BMW has not tried for some time now. That was and is my point.

But anyway, rwd doesn't *have* to be heavier than fwd. What's an Elise weigh? What's a Smart weigh? A LOT less than a Fit!
Yeah, an Elise is a great example. It only costs 3-4x what a Fit costs, has room for 1.5 people, no cargo space and is not even in the same class. A Smart, on the other hand, is a pointless vehicle and doesn't have anywhere near the space and cargo room of a Fit. In other words, neither is a valid competitor

Keep trying!

It ain't just BMW that isn't doing this - it's EVERYONE. In this class of car, FWD is the way to go for every reason that matters. It's not like they're trying to make ultimate driving machines for $15K.
But BMW could and should make a rwd car that is more like a 2002 or E30 in terms of weight than a Buick. Again, if Toyobaru can make a 2750 lb. rwd car, so can BMW. Obviously it wouldn't be $15k, but I bet people would gobble them up at twice that price.
Anything is possible, just not within the price envelope and meeting the other requirements of the car. Comparatively and generally speaking, RWD is more expensive, it's less efficient and it weighs more than a FWD setup. It's not that you can't make a lightweight RWD car that is efficient, only that it won't be as light, efficient or cost effective as a comparable FWD setup and those are things that matter in this segment more than having RWD handling.

Also, to get down to lower weights like an E30, they'd need to add in lightweight materials, bumping up costs significantly. They have much more stringent crash tests now, plus a higher expectation of options, and all of those things increase weight.

Could they do it? Sure! Could they do it cost effectively? Not on your life!
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 02:35 PM
  #22  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

If it's possible to build a modern S13 240SX at the same weight without resorting to exotic materials and construction techniques at the SAME relative performance and price points (see FR-S/BRZ), it is certainly also possible to build a modern E30 at the same weight without resorting to exotic materials and construction techniques at the SAME relative performance and price points. IF THE WILL WAS THERE. BMW are clearly far more interested in producing German Buicks and Camaros. A pity...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 02:40 PM
  #23  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Originally Posted by Zoidberg
BMW made a small sports car. It was the 1M. Every magazine called it god.
Their coolest car in quite a while. Not really terribly small or lightweight, though. Again, 1-series is entirely too close in size/weight to the oversized/overweight 3.

If they wanted to, they can make small. They can make light. But they cannot make cheap. If they have something that's not cheap and is god already and it did not make enough money.
They (for whatever reason) purposely limited production of the 1M. They could have sold tons more than they made.

But, again, not exactly a lightweight...

They should build a genuinely small, lightweight, minimalist rwd car. They suck for not doing this. That is my opinion...
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 03:50 PM
  #24  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,368
Likes: 636
Default

Zdan, its not that they cant, its because it makes no sense. Take the frs, lightweight and wat not, but the price point is just over the tc and right around the 200hp hot hatches, and even there people are saying its overpriced. Then you take the brz which has more luxury and its at 30k. Now imagine that with a bmw badge. Onl way this would happen is if they totally redesign the 1 series to be more like the frs, but why? It serves its intended purpose and the 1m is already highly praised. Id love to see a lighter 1m, but not without that i6tt engine, which is longer, bigger, and heavier than an na flat 4.
Fact is loads of people are having fun with overweight cars, because most people dont competitvely race or frequent tracks like going to the movies. And for those who do, they dont buy 40k+ to do so, and those who can drop 40k+ on a car they intend to thrash sure as heck want more than 200hp. Take your elise example, if the market was weight entric, then thoe things should be outselling vettes, m3s, porsches, etc.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 04:43 PM
  #25  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,171
Likes: 119
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
My point EXACTLY! They haven't tried to build a minimalist rwd car like the FR-S/BRZ. They should.
for who? The "enthusiast"? Enthusiasts are the minority unfortunately. BMW & BMW M are doing fine. Their having record sales doing what their doing.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 05:00 PM
  #26  
ZDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,863
Likes: 125
From: Pawtucket, RI
Default

Toyota/Subaru were doing "fine" prior to the FR-S/BRZ. Now they're doing slightly better than "fine".

Obviously BMW should continue down the path of adding ever more luxury, size, power, weight according to the logic of some...

There ways they can be a successful company, and actually make some cool cars and get some new customers at the same time.

Sad to see the continued Buickification, now with a fwd accent at the low end, with a giant gaping hole in the middle for enthusiasts of small, lightweight, rwd sports coupes/sedans.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 05:05 PM
  #27  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,171
Likes: 119
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Toyota/Subaru were doing "fine" prior to the FR-S/BRZ. Now they're doing slightly better than "fine".

Obviously BMW should continue down the path of adding ever more luxury, size, power, weight according to the logic of some...

There ways they can be a successful company, and actually make some cool cars and get some new customers at the same time.

Sad to see the continued Buickification, now with a fwd accent at the low end, with a giant gaping hole in the middle for enthusiasts of small, lightweight, rwd sports coupes/sedans.
toyota has now 1 sports car. Fine. BMW has many more "sporty" fun to drive cars than subaru or toyota.

BMW's doesn't compete with toyota, honda; etc. Only against Mercedes & Audi. They are doing pretty well against them. Their M division is easily the winner right now.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 05:15 PM
  #28  
ahbongkadah's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach
Default

Originally Posted by ZDan
Toyota/Subaru were doing "fine" prior to the FR-S/BRZ. Now they're doing slightly better than "fine".

Slightly being the key word. In July Toyota sold 147,000 cars/trucks, a whopping 1,649 of them being the FRS. There's just not a huge market for stripped down rwd sports cars.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 06:40 PM
  #29  
cbehney's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 16
From: No VA
Default

If BMW brings this to the U.S, they'll have to change their advertising tagline - "We only make one thing - the ultimate driving machine."

Why would people buy this car? Is it going to be more fun than similar small FWD cars? A bit more luxurious? Or just the badge?

To me, and I know it's all opinion, it looks wrong/odd to see the BMW grill and badging on that car.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2012 | 06:52 PM
  #30  
20aeman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Default

Honestly who gives a crap. If weight is a problem for you, then go buy a light car. There are bmw alternatives too; E36 M3 lightweight, z3 m, e30 m3, etc. If you think that people prefer -200lbs to bluetooth, 100hp, nvh, space, etc...then you're batshit crazy.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:02 PM.