bye bye Chrysler
Originally Posted by cdelena,Apr 30 2009, 11:42 AM
Nope! There is such a thing as senior debt that gets paid first in a bankruptcy and it is the share holders; Cerberus, Daimler, and the taxpayers that get nada. Any concessions made by the big banks are because the government is twisting arms because of the TARP funding.
Don't get fooled by the flowery talk out of Washington, this should be treated as a normal bankruptcy so that contracts are honored.
Don't get fooled by the flowery talk out of Washington, this should be treated as a normal bankruptcy so that contracts are honored.
Secured debt is senior to unsecured debt. Some unsecured senior debt may be senior to other unsecured debt. The fact that the large secured creditors were willing to take a "haircut" is indicative of the real risk that no assets exist to fully secure that debt.
Notwithstanding the senior status of a loan or other debt instrument, another debt instrument (whether senior or otherwise) may benefit from security that effectively renders that other instrument more likely to be repaid in an insolvency or bankruptcy than unsecured senior debt. Lenders of a secured debt instrument (regardless of ranking) receive the benefit of the security for that instrument until they are repaid in full, without having to share the benefit of that security with any other lenders. If the value of the security is insufficient to repay the secured debt, the residual unpaid claim will rank according to its documentation (whether senior or otherwise), and will receive pro rata treatment with other unsecured debts of such rank.
Do you really think Chrysler has the assets to cover even the more senior unsecured debt? I don't... Not only that, but I very much doubt that smaller bondholders have more senior unsecured debt to the larger institutions. It's usually the reverse, because the larger institutions had more bargaining power to gain more favorable terms when the loans/bonds were issued. The secured creditors will be paid out first in bankruptcy, and then there may be nothing left after that...
Originally Posted by andy92782,Apr 30 2009, 12:08 PM
The level of government involvement with Chrysler and GM is frightening. It scares me when I read headlines in the news that say things like "Obama administration official confirms Chrysler bankruptcy." There goes capitalism...
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
So the brainwizards at Chrysler will now try to cram six liter hemis into small fwd cars I guess. But not before they can figure out how to take any sleek lines of the Fiats and make them into hard edged rectanlges.
Hmmmm on another forum they noted that it was against Union rules for them to have a controlling interest in any company with Union members. I'd say 55% would be considered controlling interest. Wonder how that will play out?
Originally Posted by Impulse147,Apr 30 2009, 12:37 PM
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
Originally Posted by Impulse147,Apr 30 2009, 12:37 PM
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
I think the new thing we should try is to actually listen when companies say something isn't sustainable. When GM originally agreed to pensions it was hard for them to politically say no. They had just earned a record $1B. They were the wealthiest company in the world and were paying huge dividends to their shareholders. It was politically very difficult for them to say, or get people to believe them, when they would say these plans are a huge long term risk.
I posted this in another thread. This is what Ford said about these pension plans and guaranteed employment when the union was pushing for it in the early 50s.
[QUOTE]The only security - the only guarantee - worth anything to Ford employees it that their company will be healthy, competitive and progressive enough to be able to employ them at a high rate of wages and benefits.
Originally Posted by vader1,Apr 30 2009, 12:42 PM
So the brainwizards at Chrysler will now try to cram six liter hemis into small fwd cars I guess. But not before they can figure out how to take any sleek lines of the Fiats and make them into hard edged rectanlges.
Originally Posted by Impulse147,Apr 30 2009, 03:37 PM
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".
I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.









Vader, I love your disclaimers