Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

bye bye Chrysler

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:19 PM
  #21  
Kamron's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 5
From: Royal Oak, Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by cdelena,Apr 30 2009, 11:42 AM
Nope! There is such a thing as senior debt that gets paid first in a bankruptcy and it is the share holders; Cerberus, Daimler, and the taxpayers that get nada. Any concessions made by the big banks are because the government is twisting arms because of the TARP funding.

Don't get fooled by the flowery talk out of Washington, this should be treated as a normal bankruptcy so that contracts are honored.
I don't have to be fooled by the flowery talk out of Washington; contracts are discharged in bankruptcy, not honored.

Secured debt is senior to unsecured debt. Some unsecured senior debt may be senior to other unsecured debt. The fact that the large secured creditors were willing to take a "haircut" is indicative of the real risk that no assets exist to fully secure that debt.

Notwithstanding the senior status of a loan or other debt instrument, another debt instrument (whether senior or otherwise) may benefit from security that effectively renders that other instrument more likely to be repaid in an insolvency or bankruptcy than unsecured senior debt. Lenders of a secured debt instrument (regardless of ranking) receive the benefit of the security for that instrument until they are repaid in full, without having to share the benefit of that security with any other lenders. If the value of the security is insufficient to repay the secured debt, the residual unpaid claim will rank according to its documentation (whether senior or otherwise), and will receive pro rata treatment with other unsecured debts of such rank.

Do you really think Chrysler has the assets to cover even the more senior unsecured debt? I don't... Not only that, but I very much doubt that smaller bondholders have more senior unsecured debt to the larger institutions. It's usually the reverse, because the larger institutions had more bargaining power to gain more favorable terms when the loans/bonds were issued. The secured creditors will be paid out first in bankruptcy, and then there may be nothing left after that...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:37 PM
  #22  
Impulse147's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Columbus,OH
Default

Originally Posted by andy92782,Apr 30 2009, 12:08 PM
The level of government involvement with Chrysler and GM is frightening. It scares me when I read headlines in the news that say things like "Obama administration official confirms Chrysler bankruptcy." There goes capitalism...
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?

It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".

I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #23  
vader1's Avatar
Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,952
Likes: 478
From: MAHT-O-MEDI
Default

So the brainwizards at Chrysler will now try to cram six liter hemis into small fwd cars I guess. But not before they can figure out how to take any sleek lines of the Fiats and make them into hard edged rectanlges.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:45 PM
  #24  
Kamron's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,426
Likes: 5
From: Royal Oak, Michigan
Default

Vader, I love your disclaimers
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 12:58 PM
  #25  
Wildncrazy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,771
Likes: 2
Default

Hmmmm on another forum they noted that it was against Union rules for them to have a controlling interest in any company with Union members. I'd say 55% would be considered controlling interest. Wonder how that will play out?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 01:05 PM
  #26  
Onehots2k's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,536
Likes: 0
From: Orlando
Default

Originally Posted by Impulse147,Apr 30 2009, 12:37 PM
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?

It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".

I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.

Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #27  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by Impulse147,Apr 30 2009, 12:37 PM
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?

It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".

I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
Before you turn control over to the feds you should read about the history of these pension plans and obligations that have hurt the US auto, steel and other Industries. The origin of these issues is not solely the fault of the companies. The companies did not want these plans at all. The same Washington whom some see as salvation were in large part helped plant the seeds of the problem.

I think the new thing we should try is to actually listen when companies say something isn't sustainable. When GM originally agreed to pensions it was hard for them to politically say no. They had just earned a record $1B. They were the wealthiest company in the world and were paying huge dividends to their shareholders. It was politically very difficult for them to say, or get people to believe them, when they would say these plans are a huge long term risk.

I posted this in another thread. This is what Ford said about these pension plans and guaranteed employment when the union was pushing for it in the early 50s.
[QUOTE]The only security - the only guarantee - worth anything to Ford employees it that their company will be healthy, competitive and progressive enough to be able to employ them at a high rate of wages and benefits.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #28  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by vader1,Apr 30 2009, 12:42 PM
So the brainwizards at Chrysler will now try to cram six liter hemis into small fwd cars I guess. But not before they can figure out how to take any sleek lines of the Fiats and make them into hard edged rectanlges.
Sleek? Like the sleek 500 or the Panda?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 01:42 PM
  #29  
Incubus's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 5,729
Likes: 2
Default

BBC
"Italy's Fiat will not have to pay anything for its share, which will give it access to the North American marketplace. It will also have the right to appoint three company directors."

Sounds like a good deal to me.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #30  
GPMike's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,513
Likes: 0
From: USSA
Default

Originally Posted by Impulse147,Apr 30 2009, 03:37 PM
Why is it people are complaining about capitalism going away?

It had its shot and these Corporations and CEO's proved that they can't run company's with a sense of Morality and fairness to their Employees and Consumers,so the Government is saying "Enough is Enough".

I'm not saying the Government is gonna do any better,because a socialistic Democracy has its Cons just as Capitalism does,But maybe its time we try something new.
Your same thinking was applied in Nazi Germany. Look what that got us. Careful what you wish for.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 PM.