Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Difference between Buick GN and GNX???

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
jayhawker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: mesa
Default Difference between Buick GN and GNX???

What are the differences between the two? I remember the GNX was not produced as much as the GN. Which is fater? GN, GNX or the 25Th Anniv. Trans AM? Just wondering. I can't believe the price for a 25TH Anniv TA. Talk about resale value!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 06:47 PM
  #2  
99GT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

As quoted from http://my.ohio.voyager.net/~rowilson/story.htm :
***
The Story behind the GNX
The GNX was designed to be the "Grand National to end all Grand Nationals". Outwardly the GNX resembles the Grand National but the modifications performed on these cars made them one of the fastest, best handling and most sought after cars Buick had ever built. It was developed by the then Advanced Concepts & Marketing Vehicles manager, Mike Doble. The car was to be converted by ASC/McLaren. McLaren had been involved with the original Buick/McLaren V-6 racer used at Indy and the 24 valve V-6 Wildcat concept car. McLaren had also developed some early prototypes of the Intercooled Grand National. The basic concept was to build the car to be a full second quicker than the Grand National and improve it's handling. Although plans called for Engine blueprinting, head porting, special bearings, shot-peened rods, and a high-rpm valve train, testing of stock Grand National engines showed that the GNX goal could be met without opening the engine. There were 547 GNXs built and all were 2! doo r coupes and optioned the same, there were no additions or deletions.
To quote the Owners manual "The GNX is a special Grand National with certain modifications to accentuate it's already outstanding performance."

Basically the body and drivetrain remained common with the turbocharged Regal Grand National with a few exceptions.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


What the Critics Say:
"The GNX is an ax-wielding barbarian laying waste to everything in it's path"
"Rockets to 60 mph in 4.7 seconds and squirts through the quarter-mile in 13.5 seconds at 102 mph"
(Tony Assenza) Car & Driver, May 1987: Buick GNX



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"This (GNX) is no batamweight, over-motored car. It's a hefty 3,500 pound family sedan. ANd on this cold, blustery day, five very large men-give or take a pound, 1,082 pounds of them-fill up every inch of it's livable interior space. What the hell-a stand-on-it run is in order. In less than 20 seconds-20 seconds!-fuel shutoff valve kicks in signifying the ride is over. That's impressive."

(Dutch Mandel) Autoweek, February 16, 1987: Speedway Born



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"More than a straight-line rocket sled, the GNX is a suspension tuned to hug the corners like a Grand Prix car."

(Paul Garson) Car Craft, September 1987: The Ultimate American Muscle Machine



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"For you who remember the spine-snapping GTOs, Road Runners, 4-4-2s and Shelbys of 20 years ago and think they'll never be equalled in this era of desmogged Wimpmobiles, they have. And passed. By the Buick GNX."
"And they came up with a 300 hp stroker that looks like Darth Vader's Staff Car. One that, unlike the GTOs and Road Runners, doesn't pitch and yaw when when you ask for a smoking burnout. It goes straight. And goes. And goes."

(Scott Heimer, Auto Editor) Philadelphia Daily News: Ride On!
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2003 | 06:51 PM
  #3  
robb's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 30,105
Likes: 5,450
From: Bondville
Default

99 GT beat me to it. Good info.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 11:58 AM
  #4  
texasbman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by jayhawker
[B]What are the differences between the two?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #5  
jayhawker's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: mesa
Default

What was faster? 25TH anniv Trans Am, or GNX?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2003 | 05:20 PM
  #6  
DDD's Avatar
DDD
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
From: Cedar Park
Default

My guess would be the GNX, but not by much (I'm assuming you mean 1/4 mile). Both cars have similar curb weight, with published values being anywhere from 3350 to 3500 lbs, and similar HP ratings 275hp for the TA and 276hp for the GNX, but the GNX kills the TA with 360lb-ft of torque making it easier to launch (and it seems the hp ratings were more conservative than the TA). With that said the GNX seems to be on average about .3-.5 seconds faster in the 1/4 mile when new, but with cars this old its probably a case by case basis.
Darron
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Legal Bill
S2000 Vintage Owners
36
Apr 6, 2018 12:15 PM
gofast182
New York - Metro New York S2000 Owners
65
Jul 28, 2010 12:06 PM
BobsS2000
Inland Empire S2000 Owners
0
Jan 26, 2007 07:15 PM
S2K:-)
The S2000 Gallery
6
Jun 19, 2006 07:18 AM
alexf20c
Car and Bike Talk
64
Sep 10, 2002 06:46 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 AM.