Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.
View Poll Results: which would you buy?
EVO
43.59%
STI
56.41%
Voters: 117. You may not vote on this poll

EVO or STI

Thread Tools
 
Old May 10, 2006 | 07:17 PM
  #41  
Hot.Damn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: wildomar
Default

i vote EVO maily cause the new STI=not pretty
Reply
Old May 10, 2006 | 07:56 PM
  #42  
psychoazn's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,223
Likes: 4
From: Orange County, CA
Default

you can feel the turbo lag in both vehicles, but I personally go for the STi; It has a unique sound (unless you replace the header with an even-length piping one), while the evo's engine is 'just another turbo'd 4banger'
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 12:13 AM
  #43  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

cbeyond: the 6th gear is not a cruising gear, thus the fuel economy is not improved, and there is no actual proof that the 6spd tranny suffers more stress than the 5spd.

geoff: i see, yea in that case the STi might be the better car for him what year is he goin for? hopefully not the 06 lol. jk
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 12:14 AM
  #44  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

planets: first year mr is 2005
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 12:31 AM
  #45  
JUMA's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

Originally Posted by CBeyond,May 10 2006, 05:13 PM
Why would there be a degredation in fuel economy? That one makes no sense to me. The sixth gear should improve fuel economy at highway speeds. Also not sure what you mean by "extra stress."
The various tests and consumer reports show that 6-speed in MR affects fuel economy. They basically squeezed an extra gear into existing proven tranny making them more vulnerable. The fastest Evo's I've seen at the tracks were 03 5-speeds.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 12:39 AM
  #46  
geoff2005's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 6,697
Likes: 0
From: Walnut/Diamond Bar, SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by fusionchickenleg,May 11 2006, 01:13 AM
cbeyond: the 6th gear is not a cruising gear, thus the fuel economy is not improved, and there is no actual proof that the 6spd tranny suffers more stress than the 5spd.

geoff: i see, yea in that case the STi might be the better car for him what year is he goin for? hopefully not the 06 lol. jk
lol yeah its 06 sti or evo 9 . see you at the winniey wesnday meet next week
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 01:22 AM
  #47  
TheDonEffect's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 8,364
Likes: 636
Default

STI for me, any car manufacturer can make an all out track car, takes a special manufacturer to get as much of it into a driveable package. The STI has the quality and the few compromises it makes in terms of performance is more than acounted for in the driveability gains. If Subaru wanted to beat Mitsu, they could have but chose a more well mannered route (granted both cars are still hardcore).
Also, the boxer motor in the STI has been tried and true as it is basically the same motor from the older STIs, granted it doesn't go as far back as the 4g63, it still has a tremendous amount of credibility; fact is the 4g63 will be more popular here in the states.
Also, I am curious on how an exhaust, intake, ecu work, and a boost controller can make 300whp on pump gas without any fuel/turbo/block upgrades.
Fact of the matter is that both cars can be tuned to whatever spec you want it for, and the prices are going to be close. Still, I can't get over the valve tick, crankwalk, and tranny problems that plagued DSMs of the past and WRXs run rather well...
I owned a 95 Talon TSI AWD, loved it, but had they brought over the WRX coupe of the time, I definitely would've went with that.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 06:11 AM
  #48  
duboseq's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Florida
Default

Originally Posted by JUMA,May 10 2006, 06:41 PM
4G63T has always been paired with a 5-speed tranny. Added extra top gear results in extra stress, less fuel economy, and extra weight.
The MR Evo is six speed.
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 09:36 AM
  #49  
Visco's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Torrance
Default

Originally Posted by TheDonEffect,May 11 2006, 09:22 AM
Also, I am curious on how an exhaust, intake, ecu work, and a boost controller can make 300whp on pump gas without any fuel/turbo/block upgrades.
Evos run very rich from the factory. Just check out any stock Evos bumper near the tailpipe.

No need for an intake either, K&N filter in stock box flow well enough.

TBE, Boost controller, Flash/SAfC tuning is all that should be needed for close to 300 awhp
Reply
Old May 11, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #50  
fusionchickenleg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,367
Likes: 6
From: SoCal
Default

http://forums.evolutionm.net/showpost.php?...308&postcount=1

called the Warrtalon package (warrtalon is s2ki's wisonsin on the evo board lol, except he's not a mod). $1270 with 330whp on pump gas...pretty impressive if u ask me.

honestly if u've driven both cars, they dont feel drastically different. the STi doesn't feel a lot more forgiving on the road, neither does the Evo feel extremely loud/bumpy compared to the STi. the STi has more amenities, and that's about it.

geoff: see u next wed
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:17 PM.