Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

EVO vs. s2000

Thread Tools
 
Old May 16, 2003 | 06:11 AM
  #11  
Z06-KILLR's Avatar
Registered User
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,335
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Default

Originally posted by tidalwdave
This thread sucks.
I agree...
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 06:12 AM
  #12  
DJAuggie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 901
Likes: 0
From: Albany
Default

Why does it suck? I asked a simple question out of curiosity. Sorry if the 10 seconds of reading it interrupted your lives. Read the header, if you don't like it, MTFO.

-Shawn
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 06:11 PM
  #13  
94rexsf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: san leandro
Default

shawn,

It sucks because 3000GT's are slow, fat-pigs with a design that would make pontiac F-body owners proud.

Later.
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 06:14 PM
  #14  
koala's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,731
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Originally posted by 94rexsf
shawn,

It sucks because 3000GT's are slow, fat-pigs with a design that would make pontiac F-body owners proud.

Later.

Oooo, that hurts!
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #15  
ITR #203's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
From: Roswell
Default

94rexsf: Was that really necessary? I prefer Rx-7's also, but that was not relavent to the topic at hand at all. He could probably counter with how unreliable 3rd gen Rx-7's were (damn sequential turbos).

To tell you my theory, from a roll the S2000 has a shot, but it will be close. All wheel drive means all wheel drivetrain loss, which is an advantage for the S2000. However, the weight difference matters less and less as the speeds get higher and even though the EVO only has 5 gears, they are very agresive and the only time you could manipulate that is if you go from 112 mph cause that's when they have to shift into a rather tall 5th gear at the fuel cut of 7600 rpms (redline is at 7000). Also, you cant ignore the 31 CRANK hp advantage that the EVO holds. But the S2000 would have a chance. However, this is all theoretical and I have not heard of any races from a roll. I did hear about some EVO owners bragging that they whooped a couple S2000's from a stop but I think everyone expected that.

Of course with a boost controller and a V-AFC on the EVO or any of the stage 1 or stage 0 packages from various maufacturers, it's the EVO all the way.
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 09:42 PM
  #16  
MrForgetable's Avatar
Gold Member (Premium)
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 15,960
Likes: 7
From: USC
Default

isnt the V in VAFC for VTEC? Evo has VTEC? of course, i may be wrong.
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 09:45 PM
  #17  
Mark_is300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: SoCal/ Bangkok.
Default

Anyone in SoCal wanted to run my EVO before I'm getting mods? Anyways, the check engine light just came on my car and it just drives fine. Wonder how good Mitsubishi products are...
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 09:51 PM
  #18  
xpander4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,451
Likes: 0
From: Las Olas and Brickell, FL
Default

EVO would use an S-AFC, not V-AFC


BTW all this talk of straight line speed....the EVO lapped Nurburing 5 seconds faster than the S2000....5 seconds is alot.
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 10:05 PM
  #19  
94rexsf's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 533
Likes: 0
From: san leandro
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by ITR #203
[B]94rexsf:
Reply
Old May 16, 2003 | 10:06 PM
  #20  
Carlson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,094
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
Default

[QUOTE]Originally posted by DJAuggie
[B]Why does it suck?
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:36 AM.