Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Fiat 500 Abarth

Thread Tools
 
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 07:18 AM
  #21  
Switchblade's Avatar
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 12
From: Nazareth, PA
Default

The Fiat 500 Abarth seems like a pretty cool little car. Not sure if I'd own one though. I would like to have the model in the commercials!!




Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 07:21 AM
  #22  
North Star's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,867
Likes: 3
From: The South
Default

Originally Posted by liquid_helix136
FWD is unfortunate but less drivetrain loss and better economy would be nice for a DD, whipping the ass out would be reserved for the s2k. While the FRS really is pretty solid value for the money with the fun factor, I think I'd rather go with the Abarth having a turbo engine, it'd be a lot easier to make fast. Giving extra power to the N/A FRS minus boost would prove difficult similar to the S2K. But if your not looking for power, your right the FRS might be a better choice
Actually, the FA20 boxer is putting up some big gains with simple bolt-on's. Here is a post from the Official BRZ/FRS thread:

Originally Posted by ian02s2k
Here are the dyno results for prototype catted headers...



Here is the SRT catback, stock headers


Here is Ecutek's tuning on stock everything...
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 07:52 AM
  #23  
Zoidberg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Default

I am excited for these. Yes for the price range, if you're looking for something more like a sports car, then the BRZ/FRS is probably the way to go. But then again, a used S2000 is a better way to go.

But these Fiats are a completely different beast (if we can call it that). It won't put out the numbers that some others can, but they're very fun to drive, though in a different definition of fun than were used to.

I haven't yet driven the Abarth, but I have driven a couple 500s and they are so quick and nimble. The steering response and braking response just seems ridiculous. Now throw in a more aggressive suspension and some power and it would be a blast to drive anywhere any time.

A Mini S will probably outperform in most categories and feel more planted around a track. But for darting around town on the daily, the feel of this car would bring some huge fun factor to whatever you do. And at it's price, it's within reason to buy it just for that.

Oh yeah and Charlie Sheen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjYxE2VD7VE
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 08:02 AM
  #24  
cbehney's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 16
From: No VA
Default

Originally Posted by Switchblade
The Fiat 500 Abarth seems like a pretty cool little car. Not sure if I'd own one though. I would like to have the model in the commercials!!




I strongly suspect you wouldn't want her after Charlie Sheen is done with her.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:00 AM
  #25  
Saki GT's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 36,017
Likes: 226
From: Queen City, NC
Default

Abarth or not, the steering wheel doesn't telescope - it makes for an awkward driving position.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:02 AM
  #26  
turbo_pwr's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,831
Likes: 2
From: Paradise Valley, AZ miss NYC
Default

Dyno-comp did ECU and exhaust on the Abarth with good results. Note done on Dyno-Dynamics dyno usually known as the "heartbreaker" for dyno readings.

http://dyno-comp.com/blog/2012/06/fi...1-ecu-upgrade/

Bone Stock: 2011 Fiat 500 Abarth Turbo

REAL WORLD this is what a 2011 Fiat 500 Abarth puts down for power..
130 (Wheel HP) x 1.23 = 160 HP at the flywheel.
138 (Wheel TQ) x 1.23 = 170 TQ at the flywheel.

These numbers were taken from a stock car and may vary.
HP is now at 165 (at the wheels) which equates out to about 203 HP at the flywheel.
TQ is now at 194 (at the wheels) which is approx 239 TQ at the flywheel.

At the end of the day what does all this mean…
+43 HP increase at the flywheel.
+69 TQ increase at the flywheel.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:04 AM
  #27  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

You know, it's probably lots of fun, but it just looks ridiculous. For the price there are many other cars that are nearly as fun and look way better.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:08 AM
  #28  
turbo_pwr's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,831
Likes: 2
From: Paradise Valley, AZ miss NYC
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
You know, it's probably lots of fun, but it just looks ridiculous. For the price there are many other cars that are nearly as fun and look way better.
Ok, I'll bite what cars are starting at $22k and are nearly as fun?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:15 AM
  #29  
Ouhei's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,421
Likes: 5
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

I'd love to have a white one, they seem like fun little cars! I tried to convince my fiancee to get one but she thought it was too small.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2012 | 09:16 AM
  #30  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by turbo_pwr
Originally Posted by deepbluejh' timestamp='1342631059' post='21869895
You know, it's probably lots of fun, but it just looks ridiculous. For the price there are many other cars that are nearly as fun and look way better.
Ok, I'll bite what cars are starting at $22k and are nearly as fun?
Focus ST, MS3, and BRZ all start at $25k. It would be 3k well spent.

And that's ignoring the plethora of lightly used cars for that amount which are much more desirable.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 PM.