Financing vs Cash
Right out of school, 7 years ago, I financed my cars because I didn't have any alternative. I now pay cash for any car purchase. My logic is that I will take the imputed car payment each month and dollar-cost average that into a good diversified mutual fund.
It's been working well so far. For your situation, it sounds like you need to get a nice, decent enjoyable ride and finance it. Pay it off, drive it for a while and save up money for your next car. At that point, you should have a lot of equity and cash to put down on your next vehicle.
It's been working well so far. For your situation, it sounds like you need to get a nice, decent enjoyable ride and finance it. Pay it off, drive it for a while and save up money for your next car. At that point, you should have a lot of equity and cash to put down on your next vehicle.
Those of you that say that a 3.9% loan (or whatever) is cheaper than a 5% CD or savings account are not taking into consideration the non-deductible nature of interest expense on a vehicle and the taxability of the CD interest income. Your after-tax cost of the loan is higher than your return on the CD, et al.
Additionally, there are often rebates in lieu of 0% financing, so taking the rebate and paying cash will often times be cheaper in the long run than passing on the rebate and taking the low interest rate.
Additionally, there are often rebates in lieu of 0% financing, so taking the rebate and paying cash will often times be cheaper in the long run than passing on the rebate and taking the low interest rate.
I'd try and find a good financing deal. My friend bought an 2007 STi for 36mon @ 0%. Granted that since he put little down his payments where huge, but he had the cash so he made his payments using some of the cash he was going to use to buy the car outright and made good interest off the rest.
I might be the odd one out here but I don't mind financing if I know I can pay it off early, aka within 6 months, with no penalty. I don't mind paying a little extra for what I want now right away (emphasis on LITTLE).
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Jan 10 2008, 11:10 AM
Those of you that say that a 3.9% loan (or whatever) is cheaper than a 5% CD or savings account are not taking into consideration the non-deductible nature of interest expense on a vehicle and the taxability of the CD interest income. Your after-tax cost of the loan is higher than your return on the CD, et al.
Additionally, there are often rebates in lieu of 0% financing, so taking the rebate and paying cash will often times be cheaper in the long run than passing on the rebate and taking the low interest rate.
Additionally, there are often rebates in lieu of 0% financing, so taking the rebate and paying cash will often times be cheaper in the long run than passing on the rebate and taking the low interest rate.
But anything higher than 2.9% gets to the point where the loan costs more.
You are correct there can be cash savings in place of low interest rate, but not always or if they are they may not be as good.
What's better $750 cash off or 2.9% finance. Often you can add it up and the low rate would be the same as the cash back in which case for me if it's the same I'd just as soon pay over time.
If there was a great rate such as 0% for 5 years that's worth more than $5K on a $40K loan which is probably worth more than the rebate.
Originally Posted by QUIKAG,Jan 10 2008, 01:10 PM
Those of you that say that a 3.9% loan (or whatever) is cheaper than a 5% CD or savings account are not taking into consideration the non-deductible nature of interest expense on a vehicle and the taxability of the CD interest income.
I'm not really sure what I'll do on my next purchase. I haven't had car payments in almost 2 years, and I kinda like that.
I drive a spec E30 as my daily, and spend my cash elsewhere. In fact, the two snowboards I just bought for my wife and I came out to be more than I paid for my car. But it's fun and reliable, and life is much more enjoyable with a fatter bank account.
Originally Posted by Saboten,Jan 10 2008, 10:24 AM
Seeing that most of you are car enthusiasts and at least some of you are good with your money, I was curious about what you all thought about paying for a car outright vs financing a car.
Let's say you currently had a beater, but wanted a car that cost $20,000 and you had 2 choices:
1. Save up for 3 years and get it (or a better car) at that time, but have the title in your name, save in finance charges, have no car payment, etc. or
2. Finance the car now (assuming it's within your means) and have a much more enjoyable for those 3 years instead of having to drive a beater and save money (keep in mind you are a car enthusiast and would hate to drive a beater POS)
Consider the extra cost you pay for the financing as an entertainment expense, such as TV, eating out, etc.
What would be the more preferable scenario to you guys?
Let's say you currently had a beater, but wanted a car that cost $20,000 and you had 2 choices:
1. Save up for 3 years and get it (or a better car) at that time, but have the title in your name, save in finance charges, have no car payment, etc. or
2. Finance the car now (assuming it's within your means) and have a much more enjoyable for those 3 years instead of having to drive a beater and save money (keep in mind you are a car enthusiast and would hate to drive a beater POS)
Consider the extra cost you pay for the financing as an entertainment expense, such as TV, eating out, etc.
What would be the more preferable scenario to you guys?
, im just 22 years old
, with a 742 becon score
, and have my s2k that i got an excellent financing rate. 2000 s2k and i got a 5.9% wich is not the best but thats because not any random bank wants to finance a 2000 vehicle. Good luck!
Originally Posted by Penforhire,Jan 10 2008, 12:55 PM
Building credit? I turn down so much credit these days it is absurd. My stepson did not yet graduate college, and had no full-time job, when his credit offers came rolling in.
Building good credit and credit history takes time and consistency on payments






