Wow ! I always knew that GM was bad but check this out : http://www.autooninfo.info/AutoonInfo/TheGreatGulf.htm
http://www.autooninfo.info/NAEd20050...rseThanAve.htm
No GM for me
Looks like they are the best of the worst!!!

 

GM really needs to have a makeover. Crappy cars. Horrible reliability. Too many rebadging.

 

Did you read the methodology used to come up with these charts? I am not here to defend the domestics but I do not trust those numbers. Also note that this says nothing about current products, it is just a weird estimation of the reliability of 6 - 8 year old vehicles.

 

People like you really need to get a clue.

Guess who came in at the top of the pack for extended reliability with the last JD powers survey? Hint, it was not Honda.

 

 

I can tell this is going to be a very worthwhile, meaningful thread

 

Yea, I guess that's a good explanation why GM's doing so great.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2003-1...liablechart.htm

Look at the "least reliable" column. You make a conclusion.

 

Steve said it for me

 

 

Those website are worthless. All they are doing is repackaging CR data (which its self is statistically very suspect). The second like is especially bad because it overlooks the number of cars GM makes. In