Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

GM Quality

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 07:46 PM
  #11  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

the fundamental problem seems to be QUALITY beyond the 3 year-old mark for much of GMs product line.
The latest long term quality awards (3+ years) broke down with GM winning 8 segment awards, Ford 5 -- the first Japanese maker being Toyota with 4 ...

What we are seeing with the American makers is what we saw with the Japanese in the 80's -- a turnaround in terms of quality. The few idiots who fail to adhere to this reality are the fanbois who will always believe that any Honda is flawless -- just like the domestic idiots in the 80's who spewed the same line of bullshit.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #12  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

You people get so pissy... its hilarious.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #13  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by Roadster_1,Sep 28 2005, 10:39 PM
can't resist....

I'm not sure if anyone reads (or believes) Consumer Reports, but, that magazine consistently (for the many years I've been reading it) notes additional electrical, brakes, body integrity, and power equipment problems for MANY of GMs products. For example - take a close look at the Corvette. ...and the survey says "more than 15% have electrical probems on a 3 year old 'vette".... The sky's the limit...just how much "more" I wonder?

Hell, to be fair, those surveys only rate the S2000 as being "average" in reliabilty....down from Honda's usual "much better than average" standing.

I can imagine there are folks on this web site that will be quick to call the publishers of CR and the hundreds of thousands of surveyed households "fanbois" / "fangurls".
Just not too sure I'd agree with them...

While American auto manufacturing HAS improved of late (and, I sincerely hope it continues in that direction), the fundamental problem seems to be QUALITY beyond the 3 year-old mark for much of GMs product line.

Having said the above...I'll readily admit the new C6, and, in particular, the Z06 is certainly cause for excitement. At the moment, however, it is the ONLY GM product I'd seriously consider....yes, that includes Cadillac's(?) equivalent.


my .02....
Its ok man.. no publication is ever correct. All tests, and reliability records are false. America's car quality is top notch
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #14  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by Christople,Sep 28 2005, 07:01 PM
this thread is worthless and biased. I don't care how you read it.
You took the time to post didn't you.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 08:22 PM
  #15  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

Before anyone has a brain aneurism, I think the new vette performs great, and the American car companies are doing a great job at putting out some good performance numbers in cars like the 03 Cobra's, Z06 C6, hell, even the SRT-4 is fast. But that still doesn't change the over all reliability and build quality.

I'll be the first one to say that Honda's made in Japan are better than the ones made in the United States. Look back at service records and see once Honda started moving plants to the United States there were more problems than the Japan built models.
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #16  
no_really's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 0
From: City
Default

Originally Posted by Dark_Sub_Rosa,Sep 28 2005, 10:22 PM
I'll be the first one to say that Honda's made in Japan are better than the ones made in the United States. Look back at service records and see once Honda started moving plants to the United States there were more problems than the Japan built models.
You think it was pure coincidence the problems you say Honda started having coincide with Honda greatly increasing production numbers, regardless of where production was located?
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #17  
Dark_Sub_Rosa's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Moderator
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37,188
Likes: 4
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by no_really,Sep 29 2005, 02:17 AM
You think it was pure coincidence the problems you say Honda started having coincide with Honda greatly increasing production numbers, regardless of where production was located?
I think the problems coincide with the fact they moved production to the United States more so than increasing production numbers. That is one of my main gripes about the American mentality in general. I mean, the companies could put a little bit nicer interiors into their cars, IMO the Big 3 just use cheap looking interiors and fit and finish isn't quite as good. Which again is IMO. I think that is my gripe about quality.... now reliability I think comes from part of the assembly process and or how they are engineered etc. A product is only as good as the people who make it, so more Honda problems after they move a plant to the U.S. I honestly feel the workers don't take as much pride in their work as say the workers in the Japanese plants. Its the lazy American mentality that I think is a problem with they way the car is put together that can cause unreliable issues. I could go on but I'll wait until someone replies with a smartass answer.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 11:48 AM
  #18  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Dude, if you think American cars suck and Americans are lazy and have a crappy work mentality, please move you a** to Japan or Europe or wherever it is you think everything is better.

Good riddance.

P.S. If you're already outside the U.S. (see the Swiss flag), do us all a favor and stay there.
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #19  
9-BAR's Avatar
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 551
Likes: 42
From: Life @ 132.299 psi
Default

Wow so much anger from a "guest"

I somewhat agree and disagree with DSR;I have friends that work @ Honda in Marysville and they are very committed to quality workmanship.But if management decides to increase production by increasing line speed or by removing a worker at a job location and forcing another to do both jobs to increase "productivity" then in the long run or in some cases by the end of the day,quality suffers.

This is true if it is Honda ,Toyota or Ford......ect
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 12:44 PM
  #20  
steve c's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 6,792
Likes: 4
Default

IMO the Big 3 just use cheap looking interiors and fit and finish isn't quite as good.
Proof that you have not sat in a domestic for the past 5 years. I rent cars every week and have done so for a few years now -- domestics and Japanese cars.

The domestics have made the biggest strides in interior material choice, design and assembly. The Japanese have remained the same or gotten worse.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:16 PM.