Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

GM vs Honda

Thread Tools
 
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 05:09 AM
  #21  
Chris Stack's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 20
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

[QUOTE=JonBoy,Jan 10 2006, 01:16 PM]Also, I would like you or Corey (Corey being an accountant can probably explain it better) to explain how you can operate continually on a loss while still supposedly making a profit on each vehicle.

I understand what the article says, that they make a variable profit on the vehicle (selling price of vehicle - cost of parts and labour = variable profit), but that's like saying that I can build engines profitably for $30 but because the technology was given to me by aliens from Mars that have since retired and need money to maintain their spaceships and condos on Venus, I actually...hmm...lose money.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 05:27 AM
  #22  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

GM is certainly on hard times these days. However, compare the first 30 years of Honda's life to the first 30 of GM. Well GM became the world's largest maker in it's first 30 years and their was a lot MORE competition back then.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 05:41 AM
  #23  
Chris Stack's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 20
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

[QUOTE=rockville,Jan 11 2006, 06:27 AM]GM is certainly on hard times these days.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 06:08 AM
  #24  
sam_spider's Avatar
Site Moderator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 50,971
Likes: 3,429
From: Michigan
Default

[QUOTE=Chris Stack,Jan 11 2006, 06:41 AM]Third, Honda overcame a lot of the "racism" and prejudice of their foreign cars to succeed, GM didn't have to do that.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 06:19 AM
  #25  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,512
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Stack,Jan 11 2006, 06:09 AM
I'm not a practicing CPA, but you pretty much got it right. For GM to say that they are making a profit on each vehicle is bullshit.
-Chris, BS Accountancy
I am a practicing CPA and Chris you are basically right. The big issue here is that GM is losing money, but if they didn't sell a lot of cars, they would lose even more money. Why? Because fixed costs don't change when volume of production goes up or down.

So, GM has these crushing fixed costs, but they are making a variable profit on each vehicle made. Meaning the cost of direct parts and direct labor to build a car is MUCH less than the eventual selling price of that vehicle. That marginal profit is applied to their fixed costs and their net is a loss. But, if they didn't sell that extra vehicle, the net loss would be much, much worse.

They need to figure out a way to eliminate the legacy costs and become more competitive with the labor costs of the foreign manufacturers. Without doing so, they will continue to lose. Toyota, Honda, Nissan are not any better than GM, they just have the luxury of lower labor costs allowing them to put a few more bucks into material quality, particularly interior build-out.

As a possible scenario of what will eventually happen to GM and Ford, just take a look at United and Delta airlines. They had to go to bankruptcy court to dump their pension obligations on the government in order to get their overall labor costs in line with the discount carriers. They were also able to wrangle out significant salary cuts as well.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 06:32 AM
  #26  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Stack,Jan 11 2006, 06:41 AM
Well, first I would say "what's the point?" because what happened in ~1900-1930 and the late 50's-'80s has nothing to do with what's going on today.

Second, GM did grow quickly, but it did it through acquisitions, not through actual growth. Quite simply, they BOUGHT a lot of the competition.

Third, Honda overcame a lot of the "racism" and prejudice of their foreign cars to succeed, GM didn't have to do that.


But like I said, what's your point? How they started out 50-100 years ago has exactly zip point shit to do with the financial position they are in now.
Not meaning anything other than just adding some food for thought.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 06:47 AM
  #27  
rockville's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: Palo Alto
Default

A comment about the overhead costs. Last year, GM on average lost money on every car. However, it
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #28  
Chris Stack's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 20
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

[QUOTE=QUIKAG,Jan 11 2006, 07:19 AM]...Toyota, Honda, Nissan are not any better than GM, they just have the luxury of lower labor costs allowing them to put a few more bucks into material quality, particularly interior build-out.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 07:01 AM
  #29  
Chris Stack's Avatar
20 Year Member
Photogenic
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 20
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Default

[QUOTE=rockville,Jan 11 2006, 07:47 AM] A comment about the overhead costs. [B]Last year, GM on average lost money on every car. However, it
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2006 | 07:10 AM
  #30  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,512
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Stack,Jan 11 2006, 07:52 AM
Toyota, Honda, and Nissan are not any better unless you are talking about their ability to make cars that sell without drastic rebates/price slashing. What you are saying is that GM took a massive shit in the middle of their own bed and now must lie in it.


I'm going to be very interested to see how the crazy, raving, domestics-are-wonderful-and-inports-steal-jobs crowd reacts if/when GM and Ford go to bankruptcy court to shed pension and medical commitments. Sure, cling to the assinine notion that Toyota took your job, but now you have to choke on the shitty reality that GM just fu.cked your Dad by taking his pension. Who you going to buy from now? (not directed at you, QUIKAG, just saying in general)
Yes, GM dropped the ball when they negotiated too weakly against the UAW in the past. They made their bed and are now having to lie in it.

Some of you guys are in for a rude awakening yourselves when you realize that your jobs just got outsourced. This is a global economy, kids, and American companies are going to bear the brunt of bad news because we've all be wallowing in economic success for so long. Our standard of living is vastly higher than the majority of countries in the world. When the foreign competition can make a product for pennies on the dollar and dump it via export on our shores and undercut anything we can make domestically, we're all up shit creek.

It wasn't a big deal for GM to throw money out the window in the past because they had so much of it. Now, it's a global economy and the foreign makes are kicking a** and taking names.

Chris, your comments about domestic lovers being oblivious to the fact that GM/Ford are going to have to make major changes to the way they compensate their labor is short-sighted. While, some Detroit boys are going to be storming mad when their $100hr salary/benefits package is slashed, it's reality and it's going to happen. They're going to have to deal with it.

My dad got fu.cked in the ass by Delta airlines where he was a pilot for 17 years, but luckily he bailed and got something before they went into bankruptcy. Trust me, I see both sides of this coin, Chris. It's a shitty deal all around, but it's reality.

All I hope for the rest of you is that you have a job that is unique and skilled enough that someone from Asia, Africa, or South America can't take it away.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:40 AM.