Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

The "Killer Years" of Formula One

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 16, 2012 | 09:57 AM
  #31  
civicson234's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Default

^ this is true.... I can remeber watching videos of Jacky Iyx(sp?) walking across the start grid at Le Mans, while all the other drivers ran to their cars, back in the le mans start days. He calmly walked to his car, sat down, belted himself in, and then took off. Tons of cars were flying by him fighting for the lead. You would have the other drivers moving at racing pace, and not putting their seat belts on until they hit the Mulsanne. In the end, Jacky won the race, even after his so-called slow start. This instance led to the eventual discontinuation of the Le Mans start. And back then, the seat belt(if you could call it that) was nothing more than a belt buckle and a leather strap, in cars that were topping 150+ on the Mulsanne. I dont think manufacturers considered racecar saftey until after something catastrophic happenend. Another example i can think of was the death of Dale Earnhardt. Hans devices were worn by only a few drivers, but after his accident, they became mandatory. And im sure you could find more examples, dealing with fire suits becoming mandatory, helmets, harnesses, roll cages, and so on.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2012 | 09:18 AM
  #32  
SlowTeg's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,742
Likes: 211
Default

Originally Posted by 2wheelsmoker
For the sake of performance and victory, the team owners were pushing everything to the cutting edge and increased safety was just a burden to slow you down. The drivers knew the risks signing up and the teams knew the risks when trying to build a competitive car. As with most things, the equilibrium broke down when the death rate become absurd with the escalation of technology and drivers no longer accepted the risks involved. I'm glad they made those changes but I really don't see any way the progression towards more safety could have happened any sooner.


This is the natural progression for everything in life. You can see it in many other aspects as well. When something gets too far out of balance, it usually swings the other way like a pendulum (in this case, f1 safety). Same goes for many types of regulation/laws. When things get bad enough, people will invoke a change. It sounds like the drivers essentially formed a union and forced track owners to make things safer. Unfortunately, I don't see how things would've happened any other way either. It's human nature to push things to the point of breaking until something is done.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
windhund116
Car and Bike Talk
5
Nov 29, 2018 10:34 AM
Billj747
S2000 Racing and Competition
17
Nov 27, 2014 05:53 PM
imagin3
Car and Bike Talk
0
Jun 8, 2009 05:12 PM
webdiva
S2000 Racing and Competition
22
Jun 5, 2005 07:18 AM
loki
Car and Bike Talk
1
Jun 13, 2004 10:52 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:13 PM.