Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Lease question: $0 down vs $x down

Thread Tools
 
Old May 11, 2012 | 04:33 PM
  #41  
Anrosphynx's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, California
Default

Originally Posted by s.hasan546
Originally Posted by Anrosphynx' timestamp='1336767295' post='21690661

As another poster just said, typically leases are ways for people that cannot afford a car, to get into a car that they would not be able to finance and purchase. Power to people that do that, but in my opinion, these people would have been better off purchasing a slightly used car and driving it for a longer period of time. Status and perception make people do stupid things though.
when you use words like "typically" you make it seems like its the norm that a majority of people who lease can't afford their car. i think its the other way around. I think most people can afford the car easily. They just choose the better "financial" decision within their criteria. Most of the time leasing a car has stricter credit standards (bmw) than financing. BMW does a majority of their sales (60%) i believe in leases. So your telling me all these people can't afford their cars? BMWFS has taken some hits on overvalued residuals but they have a pretty good track record against defaults.

and if you think investments mean .1 in a checking or 1 percent in a CD you need some help with your investments.

Every investment that can make you some money will have some risk associated with it. But their are conservative funds out there that will net you 3-5%. New car loans can be had for damn near 1.5%. Rates will never be this low. In todays market, financing is the way to go for the financially savvy.
You think it is the majority of people that can't afford to lease? 1) You realize that 80 percent of people that buy a car, either finance it or pay cash right? Leasing rates are below 20 percent. So you are wrong there. 2) yes, alot (not all) people that lease a car can't afford to buy them. While credit standards may be more strict for leases, leases require little to no money down, allowing people to afford "more car" than they could by purchasing. 3) leasing usually hurts residual values. That is why Chrysler stopped leasing entirely a couple years ago, and thats why you can pick up a used BMW or Mercedes for dirt cheap 2-3 years after new. BMW has horrible residual values. 4) many automakers will finance a purchase at 0 percent or very low interest rates, so if its easier to purchase than lease, why don't these same people that can afford their cars, not just use the free money to buy the product?

As to investments, i have already made it clear that i am happy with my investments. I don't need to get on a public forum and pronounce that i am getting 9 percent interest like you feel the need to do. Hell, i wouldn't tell my closest friends what investments i have and what i am making on them.

My point is that the average American does not realize a rate of return of 9 percent on their money, whether by investments or just savings. And i think you need to look at bank rates, because that IS where most Americans put their money (outside of 401k, ect.)
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 04:39 PM
  #42  
turbo_pwr's Avatar
Former Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 13,831
Likes: 2
From: Paradise Valley, AZ miss NYC
Default

This thread makes me laugh with the amount of assumptions and generalizations that people have about others finances.

To actually answer the original question in this thread.

The only real difference is lowering your monthly payment. Some people don't want to put money down, some do and want a lower payment. In the end you pay basically the same rate.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 04:46 PM
  #43  
deepbluejh's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,724
Likes: 5
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Originally Posted by s.hasan546
Originally Posted by randycsvt' timestamp='1336765750' post='21690575
t's best to just buy a car cash, but if you have to finance it shouldn't take more than two years to pay it off.
That doesn't apply to everyones situation. 2 of my cars are financed and 1 is leased right now. I can afford to pay them off in cash but WHY would i? Im paying 1.54% for 60 months on 1 car loan and 2.9% for 60 months on another. I make roughly 9% on my money right now. Why would i pay it upfront when rates are so cheap?


To answer your question, YOU wouldn't. 9% ROI is very difficult right now and most forms of investment are MUCH lower. Also, much car loans are much higher than 1.54%.

At 2% ROI and a 4.5% car loan, it obviously makes sense to pay cash if you can.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 04:47 PM
  #44  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,171
Likes: 119
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Anrosphynx
Originally Posted by s.hasan546' timestamp='1336774109' post='21690990
[quote name='Anrosphynx' timestamp='1336767295' post='21690661']

As another poster just said, typically leases are ways for people that cannot afford a car, to get into a car that they would not be able to finance and purchase. Power to people that do that, but in my opinion, these people would have been better off purchasing a slightly used car and driving it for a longer period of time. Status and perception make people do stupid things though.
when you use words like "typically" you make it seems like its the norm that a majority of people who lease can't afford their car. i think its the other way around. I think most people can afford the car easily. They just choose the better "financial" decision within their criteria. Most of the time leasing a car has stricter credit standards (bmw) than financing. BMW does a majority of their sales (60%) i believe in leases. So your telling me all these people can't afford their cars? BMWFS has taken some hits on overvalued residuals but they have a pretty good track record against defaults.

and if you think investments mean .1 in a checking or 1 percent in a CD you need some help with your investments.

Every investment that can make you some money will have some risk associated with it. But their are conservative funds out there that will net you 3-5%. New car loans can be had for damn near 1.5%. Rates will never be this low. In todays market, financing is the way to go for the financially savvy.
You think it is the majority of people that can't afford to lease? 1) You realize that 80 percent of people that buy a car, either finance it or pay cash right? Leasing rates are below 20 percent. So you are wrong there. 2) yes, alot (not all) people that lease a car can't afford to buy them. While credit standards may be more strict for leases, leases require little to no money down, allowing people to afford "more car" than they could by purchasing. 3) leasing usually hurts residual values. That is why Chrysler stopped leasing entirely a couple years ago, and thats why you can pick up a used BMW or Mercedes for dirt cheap 2-3 years after new. BMW has horrible residual values. 4) many automakers will finance a purchase at 0 percent or very low interest rates, so if its easier to purchase than lease, why don't these same people that can afford their cars, not just use the free money to buy the product?

As to investments, i have already made it clear that i am happy with my investments. I don't need to get on a public forum and pronounce that i am getting 9 percent interest like you feel the need to do. Hell, i wouldn't tell my closest friends what investments i have and what i am making on them.

My point is that the average American does not realize a rate of return of 9 percent on their money, whether by investments or just savings. And i think you need to look at bank rates, because that IS where most Americans put their money (outside of 401k, ect.)
[/quote]

Ok keep believing all of that
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 04:49 PM
  #45  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,171
Likes: 119
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by deepbluejh
Originally Posted by s.hasan546' timestamp='1336766575' post='21690635
[quote name='randycsvt' timestamp='1336765750' post='21690575']t's best to just buy a car cash, but if you have to finance it shouldn't take more than two years to pay it off.
That doesn't apply to everyones situation. 2 of my cars are financed and 1 is leased right now. I can afford to pay them off in cash but WHY would i? Im paying 1.54% for 60 months on 1 car loan and 2.9% for 60 months on another. I make roughly 9% on my money right now. Why would i pay it upfront when rates are so cheap?


To answer your question, YOU wouldn't. 9% ROI is very difficult right now and most forms of investment are MUCH lower. Also, much car loans are much higher than 1.54%.

At 2% ROI and a 4.5% car loan, it obviously makes sense to pay cash if you can.
[/quote]

1.54% isn't way off. If you have good credit, which you should since we're all financially responsible here :roll eyes:, Penfed has rates @ 1.99% up to 60 months. many local credit unions are financing @ 2.5% or under for 60 months.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 05:26 PM
  #46  
dombey's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale
Default

Wtf is this thread about, again??
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 06:30 PM
  #47  
JERO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Tampa
Default

I've personally had 3 cars (for myself) in 21 years.

1987 Nissan Pulsar SE. Purchased in 1990 for $8200, traded it in on car #2 for $2,000.
1998 Acura Integra GSR. Purchased brand new in 1999 for $19,900, sold it in 2008 for $8,800.
2003 S2000. Bought in 2008, going on 9 years old now currently in it for ~$3,000.

So in 21 years my total depreciation is right about $21,000... or barely over $80/mo.

Of course I've probably had a few grand in repair costs, plus sales tax and minimal loan interest, etc... but this gives you a general idea of how owning a car doesn't have to cost insane money.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 07:43 PM
  #48  
ElTianti's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
From: Rome, GA
Default

I've never owned a car for less than 7 years (I owned my s2000 for 11 years) and I usually pay them off in 2 or 3 years. Prior to getting my Boss 302, I went 5 years without a car payment. That was pretty nice.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 08:17 PM
  #49  
randycsvt's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by s.hasan546
That doesn't apply to everyones situation. 2 of my cars are financed and 1 is leased right now. I can afford to pay them off in cash but WHY would i? Im paying 1.54% for 60 months on 1 car loan and 2.9% for 60 months on another.
This is the one scenario where I do think financing is a great idea. My main point is to build wealth. Most Americans who finance cars are just paying interest on their desire to keep up with the Jones'.

If your desire is to switch cars in three years or less, I would say that buying new or leasing aren't the cheapest option. .This of course all boils down to personal priorities and values, but I would rather buy a car that is a few year old and keep it for as long as I can. I buy every car at a good enough price that I can get out of it in two years and break even. My S2000 is worth about what I paid for it two years ago and I have put 50k miles on it since i bought it. I plan on keeping it for another year or two, but I could sell now and be out with little more than what I have spent on maintenance.

The hardest part of all of this is being able to make the short term sacrifices (driving the S2000 longer instead of selling
it for a new car) in order to acheive the long term gain of more money in the future.
Reply
Old May 11, 2012 | 11:15 PM
  #50  
s.hasan546's Avatar
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 6,171
Likes: 119
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by JERO
I've personally had 3 cars (for myself) in 21 years.

1987 Nissan Pulsar SE. Purchased in 1990 for $8200, traded it in on car #2 for $2,000.
1998 Acura Integra GSR. Purchased brand new in 1999 for $19,900, sold it in 2008 for $8,800.
2003 S2000. Bought in 2008, going on 9 years old now currently in it for ~$3,000.

So in 21 years my total depreciation is right about $21,000... or barely over $80/mo.

Of course I've probably had a few grand in repair costs, plus sales tax and minimal loan interest, etc... but this gives you a general idea of how owning a car doesn't have to cost insane money.
yes but like you said you only had 3 cars in 21 years. There are many people who want to, and can afford to, switch cars every 3-5 years. If you want to switch every 3ish years, leasing is the best deal depending on how many miles you drive.

Certain cars make sense to buy. Certain cars make sense to lease. & Remember the s2k is an exception! not the rule! Used s2k values have slightly appreciated in the past 2 years! thats not normal guys and not indicative of majority of the auto market.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ProV1
Car and Bike Talk
6
Mar 29, 2010 07:29 AM
mvf4s
Car and Bike Talk
9
Nov 11, 2004 03:09 PM
Toecutter
S2000 Talk
6
Dec 15, 2003 10:47 AM
philipf22
Car and Bike Talk
0
Jun 24, 2003 03:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:26 AM.