Car and Bike Talk Discussions and comparisons of cars and motorcycles of all makes and models.

Massive conversion for my CTS-V!

Thread Tools
 
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 08:46 PM
  #11  
kevinS2OOO's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 4
Default

Wow what's up with S2000 owners buying supercars now

And I am still driving an S2000 and a 93 Accord.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 05:39 AM
  #12  
flexer's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 4
Default

Originally Posted by kevinS2OOO
Wow what's up with S2000 owners buying supercars now

And I am still driving an S2000 and a 93 Accord.

We are growing up.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 06:16 AM
  #13  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Congrats, I've considered a Turbo to replace my CTS-V as a daily, but I'm still enjoying the V too much. Just put on my 3rd set of tires in 31k miles, some Michelin Super Sports, and the V is comfy when you want it to be and very fast and fun when you are in the mood. The Turbo has a lot of pluses going for it, but it doesn't seem the comfort/performance envelope is quite as wide as the V. It may have a little more performance (and much better traction), but it won't be as comfy in the day to day grind. Of course, you may not care because you're driving a Porsche 911 twin turbo.

Enjoy!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 06:43 AM
  #14  
JonBoy's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 19,734
Likes: 247
Default

Beauty! What year?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 07:08 AM
  #15  
d1rtyc4r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 944
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by EastS2k
woah nice conversion, how much did it cost you?
68! Never thought they would dip into this price range.

Originally Posted by rnye
That is a beautiful Turbo! One day.. Definitely a bucket lister.
Thanks.

Originally Posted by hellaSleepy
Very nice, congrats! Was the CTS-V just too boring for you?
Not so much boring, but didn't have a certain effect on me like the Porsche does. I always found myself thinking about my old 996tt and how it would be cool to get in another TT sometime.

Originally Posted by Marioshi
Horrifying resemblance to a vw bug in that first exterior shot (I know family ties)
That's hilarious, it does look like one there *shudder*

Originally Posted by kevinS2OOO
And I am still driving an S2000 and a 93 Accord.
I have a 1992 Honda Accord, manual tranny too. It's awesome - I can park it anywhere, it does great in the snow, installing a sound system was insanely easy when you don't give a shit about appearance, ha. I even threw an intake on it from a leftover intake I had on my old STi, it was pretty crazy how much louder and aggressive the motor sounds in that car now.

Originally Posted by QUIKAG
Congrats, I've considered a Turbo to replace my CTS-V as a daily, but I'm still enjoying the V too much. Just put on my 3rd set of tires in 31k miles, some Michelin Super Sports, and the V is comfy when you want it to be and very fast and fun when you are in the mood. The Turbo has a lot of pluses going for it, but it doesn't seem the comfort/performance envelope is quite as wide as the V. It may have a little more performance (and much better traction), but it won't be as comfy in the day to day grind. Of course, you may not care because you're driving a Porsche 911 twin turbo.
Enjoy!
I think if you drove the 997tt just once you'll be convinced. For me, I am actually excited to see 15mpg! I think I averaged 9-10 in my V.

Originally Posted by JonBoy
Beauty! What year?
2007. I almost got a 2010, but the salesman informed me the engines are completely different in that year. I had no idea that when they did the facelifts they changed the engine in the TTs.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 08:47 AM
  #16  
TommyDeVito's Avatar
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,363
Likes: 496
Default

Awesome, congrats!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 09:10 AM
  #17  
EastS2k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 11
From: SW Florida
Default

you actually made a really good call on the 07 vs 10.

I believe in 07 they still had the metzger engine, which is a full race engine block that they use in the race cars even today; granted it's less efficient - but it's pretty much bulletproof from what I've read in a porsche book, pretty sure it's good for like 700whp on stock internals

the new higher displacement TT engine are less robust and more efficient
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 12:28 PM
  #18  
kap's Avatar
kap
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 251
Likes: 3
Default

I was like "That's not a Cad... oh... LOL"

Reply
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 02:58 PM
  #19  
QUIKAG's Avatar
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 9,510
Likes: 478
From: Dallas
Default

Originally Posted by EastS2k
you actually made a really good call on the 07 vs 10.

I believe in 07 they still had the metzger engine, which is a full race engine block that they use in the race cars even today; granted it's less efficient - but it's pretty much bulletproof from what I've read in a porsche book, pretty sure it's good for like 700whp on stock internals

the new higher displacement TT engine are less robust and more efficient
The above is accurate except for the spelling. It's Mezger. . I'd take an 07-09 Turbo over the '10 as they went to a less robust engine in '10.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2014 | 10:20 AM
  #20  
Slithr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 0
From: Plano
Default

Beautiful car. Enjoy. Everyone that I know that has one, loves it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:49 AM.