Next S2000!?
What's wrong with IMA (integrated motor assist, right?) and AWD?
Added weight, added complexity, added cost, driver necessarily more removed from feeling the response at the road (steered front wheels being driven).
It would be a "new S2000" about like a front-engined rwd V10 Honda uber-Corvette would be a "new NSX".
I'd MUCH MUCH rather see a lighter-weight and simpler 10k rpm 1.6 liter S1600 with a manual steering rack
For the S, I'm all for improved efficiency, but do it by making it lighterweight and simpler, not by making it more complex and heavier (which hybridization and awd would do).
Added weight, added complexity, added cost, driver necessarily more removed from feeling the response at the road (steered front wheels being driven).
It would be a "new S2000" about like a front-engined rwd V10 Honda uber-Corvette would be a "new NSX".
I'd MUCH MUCH rather see a lighter-weight and simpler 10k rpm 1.6 liter S1600 with a manual steering rack

For the S, I'm all for improved efficiency, but do it by making it lighterweight and simpler, not by making it more complex and heavier (which hybridization and awd would do).
Trending Topics
Originally Posted by hondaBeater,May 27 2009, 06:36 AM
What's wrong with IMA and AWD. More MPG and less 'crashed my s2k' stories. It is good news to me. Atleast its a sport car from honda.










