My brother actually took the time to add up the points and the S actually comes in second.

 

you guys are killing me here.

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by S1999+1
[B]Ok, so he's a little behind.

 

[...go further back :cavemanspeak:...]

"If you reach down...there...you can play with it!"

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by PedalFaster
Having said that, I usually take a good look at the performance-oriented ratings while ignoring foo-foo stuff like styling and build quality.

 

I only wish the C5 convertible had been included. I'd like to see where they put it on fun to drive, fit and finish, transmission, style etc... next to the S2000. Sure we might have lost to it (but it's more $$), but it would be nice to see where we stand.

 

Also the S was the only car in the test under 3000 lbs well under (at 2835 lbs) compaired to the sedan like bulk of the Z (3453 lbs) and the tt (3485 lbs).

 

[QUOTE]Originally posted by rai
[B]
You mean like "Features and Amenities" Honda get's a "3" while audi and bmw get "10", Z get's "9" and Boxster get's "7"

I mean what's that about?

 

score 1 for us.